Literature DB >> 27554672

Finite Element-Derived Surrogate Models of Locked Plate Fracture Fixation Biomechanics.

Hwabok Wee1, J Spence Reid1, Vernon M Chinchilli2, Gregory S Lewis3.   

Abstract

Internal fixation of bone fractures using plates and screws involves many choices-implant type, material, sizes, and geometric configuration-made by the surgeon. These decisions can be important for providing adequate stability to promote healing and prevent implant mechanical failure. The purpose of this study was to develop mathematical models of the relationships between fracture fixation construct parameters and resulting 3D biomechanics, based on parametric computer simulations. Finite element models of hundreds of different locked plate fixation constructs for midshaft diaphyseal fractures were systematically assembled using custom algorithms, and axial, torsional, and bending loadings were simulated. Multivariate regression was used to fit response surface polynomial equations relating fixation design parameters to outputs including maximum implant stresses, axial and shear strain at the fracture site, and construct stiffness. Surrogate models with as little as three regressors showed good fitting (R 2 = 0.62-0.97). Inner working length was the strongest predictor of maximum plate and screw stresses, and a variety of quadratic and interaction terms influenced resulting biomechanics. The framework presented in this study can be applied to additional types of bone fractures to provide clinicians and implant designers with clinical insight, surgical optimization, and a comprehensive mathematical description of biomechanics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element; Fracture fixation; Locking plate and screw; Response surface

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27554672      PMCID: PMC6358019          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1714-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  25 in total

1.  Mechanical conditions in the internal stabilization of proximal tibial defects.

Authors:  Georg N Duda; Francesco Mandruzzato; Markus Heller; Jean-Pierre Kassi; Cyros Khodadadyan; Norbert P Haas
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Screw position affects dynamic compression plate strain in an in vitro fracture model.

Authors:  T Ellis; C A Bourgeault; R F Kyle
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2001 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 3.  Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology.

Authors:  Stephan M Perren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-11

4.  Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model.

Authors:  Peter Augat; Johannes Burger; Sandra Schorlemmer; Thomas Henke; Manfred Peraus; Lutz Claes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  Locking plates: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Wade R Smith; Bruce H Ziran; Jeff O Anglen; Philip F Stahel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Biomechanics of locked plates and screws.

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Erik N Kubiak; Eric Fulkerson; Frederick J Kummer; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Far cortical locking can reduce stiffness of locked plating constructs while retaining construct strength.

Authors:  Michael Bottlang; Josef Doornink; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Steven M Madey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The initial phase of fracture healing is specifically sensitive to mechanical conditions.

Authors:  Petra Klein; Hanna Schell; Florian Streitparth; Markus Heller; Jean-Pierre Kassi; Frank Kandziora; Hermann Bragulla; Norbert P Haas; Georg N Duda
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?

Authors:  Karl Stoffel; Ulrich Dieter; Gwidon Stachowiak; André Gächter; Markus S Kuster
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 10.  General principles for the clinical use of the LCP.

Authors:  Michael Wagner
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Application of Biomechanics Combined with Human Body Structure in Volleyball Technical Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Spatial Bridge Locking Fixator versus Traditional Locking Plates in Treating AO/OTA 32-A3.2 Fracture: Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Evaluation.

Authors:  Jianwei Hu; Ye Peng; Jiantao Li; Ming Li; Ying Xiong; Jiayu Xiao; Licheng Zhang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Direct electromagnetic coupling to determine diagnostic bone fracture stiffness.

Authors:  Jakob G Wolynski; Milan M Ilić; Kevin M Labus; Branislav M Notaroš; Christian M Puttlitz; Kirk C McGilvray
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-05

4.  Virtual Simulation for Interactive Visualization of 3D Fracture Fixation Biomechanics.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Hwabok Wee; Jared Vicory; April D Armstrong; J Spence Reid
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 5.  Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Dominic Mischler; Hwabok Wee; J Spence Reid; Peter Varga
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.163

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.