Literature DB >> 34370717

Virtual Simulation for Interactive Visualization of 3D Fracture Fixation Biomechanics.

Gregory S Lewis1, Hwabok Wee, Jared Vicory, April D Armstrong, J Spence Reid.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the surgical fixation of fractures, proper biomechanical stability is key in preventing clinical complications including poor fracture healing, residual deformity, loss of fixation, or implant failure. Stability is largely influenced by treatment decisions made by the surgeon. The interplay of surgeon-controlled variables and their effect on the three-dimensional (3D) biomechanics of a fracture fixation construct are often not intuitive, and current training methods do not facilitate a deep understanding of these interactions.
METHODS: A simulation software interface, FracSim, was developed. FracSim is built on a large precomputed library of finite element simulations. The software allows a surgeon to make adjustments to a virtual fracture fixation construct/weight-bearing plan and immediately visualize how these changes affect 3D biomechanics, including implant stress and fracture gap strain, important for clinical success. Twenty-one orthopaedic residents completed an instructor-led educational session with FracSim focused on bridge plating. Subjects completed pretests and posttests of knowledge of biomechanical concepts and a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Subjects scored a mean of 5.6/10 on the pretest of biomechanical knowledge. Senior residents scored better than junior residents (P = 0.04). After the educational session with FracSim, residents improved their test scores to a mean of 8.0/10, with a significant improvement (P < 0.001). Questionnaire scores indicated that subjects believed that FracSim had realistic implants, constructs, and motions and that training with FracSim was purposeful, desirable, efficient, fun, and useful for enhancing the understanding of fracture fixation biomechanics. DISCUSSION: This new type of simulation software enables interactive visualization of 3D fracture fixation biomechanics. Limitations of this study include lack of a control group undergoing traditional education and lack of a delayed posttest to assess retention. FracSim may provide an effective and engaging way to promote a deeper understanding of biomechanical concepts in the orthopaedic learner.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34370717      PMCID: PMC8692361          DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  27 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology.

Authors:  Stephan M Perren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-11

2.  Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model.

Authors:  Peter Augat; Johannes Burger; Sandra Schorlemmer; Thomas Henke; Manfred Peraus; Lutz Claes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Timely fracture-healing requires optimization of axial fixation stability.

Authors:  Devakara R Epari; Jean-Pierre Kassi; Hanna Schell; Georg N Duda
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing.

Authors:  L E Claes; C A Heigele
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Fatigue failure of plated osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures is predicted by the strain around the proximal screws.

Authors:  Peter Varga; Leonard Grünwald; Jason A Inzana; Markus Windolf
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-07-04

6.  Exploring Canadian surgeons' decisions about postoperative weight bearing for their hip fracture patients.

Authors:  Leslie Carlin; Kathryn Sibley; Richard Jenkinson; Pia Kontos; Rhona McGlasson; Hans J Kreder; Susan Jaglal
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Working length of locking plates determines interfragmentary movement in distal femur fractures under physiological loading.

Authors:  Sven Märdian; Klaus-Dieter Schaser; Georg N Duda; Mark Heyland
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  The course of bone healing is influenced by the initial shear fixation stability.

Authors:  H Schell; D R Epari; J P Kassi; H Bragulla; H J Bail; G N Duda
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 9.  Locking plates for distal femur fractures: is there a problem with fracture healing?

Authors:  Christopher E Henderson; Lori L Kuhl; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; J L Marsh
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 10.  Advancing Simulation-Based Orthopaedic Surgical Skills Training: An Analysis of the Challenges to Implementation.

Authors:  Kivanc Atesok; Shepard Hurwitz; Donald D Anderson; Richard Satava; Geb W Thomas; Ted Tufescu; Michael J Heffernan; Efstathios Papavassiliou; Steven Theiss; J Lawrence Marsh
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2019-09-02
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Dominic Mischler; Hwabok Wee; J Spence Reid; Peter Varga
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.163

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.