Gregory S Lewis1, Dominic Mischler2, Hwabok Wee3, J Spence Reid3, Peter Varga2. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA. greglewis@psu.edu. 2. AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland. 3. Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fracture fixation aims to provide stability and promote healing, but remains challenging in unstable and osteoporotic fractures with increased risk of construct failure and nonunion. The first part of this article reviews the clinical motivation behind finite element analysis of fracture fixation, its strengths and weaknesses, how models are developed and validated, and how outputs are typically interpreted. The second part reviews recent modeling studies of the femur and proximal humerus, areas with particular relevance to fragility fractures. RECENT FINDINGS: There is some consensus in the literature around how certain modeling aspects are pragmatically formulated, including bone and implant geometries, meshing, material properties, interactions, and loads and boundary conditions. Studies most often focus on predicted implant stress, bone strain surrounding screws, or interfragmentary displacements. However, most models are not rigorously validated. With refined modeling methods, improved validation efforts, and large-scale systematic analyses, finite element analysis is poised to advance the understanding of fracture fixation failure, enable optimization of implant designs, and improve surgical guidance.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Fracture fixation aims to provide stability and promote healing, but remains challenging in unstable and osteoporotic fractures with increased risk of construct failure and nonunion. The first part of this article reviews the clinical motivation behind finite element analysis of fracture fixation, its strengths and weaknesses, how models are developed and validated, and how outputs are typically interpreted. The second part reviews recent modeling studies of the femur and proximal humerus, areas with particular relevance to fragility fractures. RECENT FINDINGS: There is some consensus in the literature around how certain modeling aspects are pragmatically formulated, including bone and implant geometries, meshing, material properties, interactions, and loads and boundary conditions. Studies most often focus on predicted implant stress, bone strain surrounding screws, or interfragmentary displacements. However, most models are not rigorously validated. With refined modeling methods, improved validation efforts, and large-scale systematic analyses, finite element analysis is poised to advance the understanding of fracture fixation failure, enable optimization of implant designs, and improve surgical guidance.
Authors: Maxim Van den Abbeele; Jean-Marc Valiadis; Lucas V P C Lima; Pascal Khalifé; Philippe Rouch; Wafa Skalli Journal: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin Date: 2017-12-10 Impact factor: 1.763
Authors: Joshua C Arnone; Brett D Crist; Carol V Ward; A Sherif El-Gizawy; Troy Pashuck; Gregory J Della Rocca Journal: Injury Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Petra Klein; Hanna Schell; Florian Streitparth; Markus Heller; Jean-Pierre Kassi; Frank Kandziora; Hermann Bragulla; Norbert P Haas; Georg N Duda Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Dominic Mischler; Jana Felicitas Schader; Jan Dauwe; Lara Tenisch; Boyko Gueorguiev; Markus Windolf; Peter Varga Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2022-06-23