Literature DB >> 27554663

Quality of life before and after sinonasal surgery: a population-based matched cohort study.

Antti I Alakärppä1,2,3, Timo J Koskenkorva4,5,6, Petri T Koivunen4,5,6, Olli-Pekka Alho4,5,6.   

Abstract

A population-based matched cohort study was conducted to explore how the quality of life (QoL) changes in patients with septal deviation or recurrent/chronic rhinosinusitis after septoplasty (SP) and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). We also compared the QoL of the surgical cohort with that of a concurrently collected healthy cohort. We collected data on QoL in a population-based surgical cohort of 160 patients residing in one health care district (population 405,000) in Northern Finland, and in a control cohort comprised of 206 age- and sex-matched randomly selected subjects residing in Finland (population 5,470,000). QoL was assessed at entry and 12 months later with the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and the RAND-36 generic instruments. Seventy-six SP and 84 ESS patients and 206 controls were enrolled. At entry, the mean SNOT-22 scores of the SP and ESS groups were similar (34.9 and 35.1, respectively) and both were significantly worse than the control group (17.7). At 12 months, the mean SNOT-22 score had improved after SP [change 15.7, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 11.4-19.9] and ESS (change 18.0, 95 % CI 12.4-20.9) and almost reached that of the control group, which remained unchanged. The benefit was similar regardless of the surgical indication. At 12 months, mean RAND-36 scores had improved in most domains in both patient groups and remained unchanged in the controls. After appropriate surgical criteria, both SP and ESS are effective in enhancing QoL on the population level, and postoperative QoL almost reaches the level of the control population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohort studies; Nasal septum; Nasal surgical procedures; Paranasal sinuses; Quality of life; Sinusitis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27554663     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4272-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  30 in total

1.  Acute sinusitis: Finnish clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Karin Blomgren; Olli-Pekka Alho; Liisa Ertama; Pentti Huovinen; Matti Korppi; Marjukka Mäkelä; Matti Penttilä; Anne Pitkäranta; Seppo Savolainen; Helena Varonen; Jouko Suonpää
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  2005

Review 2.  A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best?

Authors:  A D Morley; H R Sharp
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  Clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with nasal polyposis after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Vojko Djukic; Zoran Dudvarski; Nenad Arsovic; Milovan Dimitrijevic; Ljiljana Janosevic
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaires in rhinitis and rhinosinusitis: review and evaluation.

Authors:  Dirk A E Dietz de Loos; Christine L Segboer; Artur Gevorgyan; Wytske J Fokkens
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.806

5.  A multi-centre study on quality of life and absenteeism in patients with CRS referred for endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  P Sahlstrand-Johnson; B Ohlsson; C Von Buchwald; M Jannert; Marianne Ahlner-Elmqvist
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006.

Authors:  Karen A Cullen; Margaret J Hall; Aleksandr Golosinskiy
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2009-01-28

7.  Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Chad J Gwaltney; Alan L Shields; Saul Shiffman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  Long-term utility outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Luke Rudmik; Jess Mace; Zachary M Soler; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Long-Term Outcomes in Sinus Surgery: A New Tool for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Aaron K Remenschneider; Laura D'Amico; Jamie R Litvack; Stacey T Gray; Eric H Holbrook; Richard Gliklich; Ralph Metson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Quality of life comparison in common rhinologic surgeries.

Authors:  Mohsen Naraghi; Behrooz Amirzargar; Alipasha Meysamie
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2012-06-21
View more
  4 in total

1.  Predictive factors of a beneficial quality of life outcome in patients undergoing primary sinonasal surgery: a population-based prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Antti I Alakärppä; Timo J Koskenkorva; Petri T Koivunen; Olli-Pekka Alho
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A prediction modeling based on SNOT-22 score for endoscopic nasal septoplasty: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Xue-Ran Kang; Bin Chen; Yi-Sheng Chen; Bin Yi; Xiaojun Yan; Chenyan Jiang; Shulun Wang; Lixing Lu; Runjie Shi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Prognostic factors for outcome after septoplasty in 888 patients from the Swedish National Septoplasty Register.

Authors:  Lars Pedersen; L Schiöler; S Finjan; Å Davidsson; O Sunnergren; K Holmberg; C Ahlström Emanuelsson; J Hellgren
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Odontogenic causes complicating the chronic rhinosinusitis diagnosis.

Authors:  Annina Wuokko-Landén; Karin Blomgren; Anni Suomalainen; Hannamari Välimaa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.