Literature DB >> 16620328

A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best?

A D Morley1, H R Sharp.   

Abstract

* In patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis, there is a lack of a universally accepted system for the evaluation of outcome. * This makes critical comparison between results less meaningful. * To determine the most suitable sinonasal outcome scoring system for use in our own practice, we reviewed the available literature and known systems in existence. * We analysed 15 known disease-specific sinonasal outcome indices with emphasis on reliability, validity and responsiveness. * We concluded by choosing one quality of life outcome tool for our departmental use, the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22, due to its reliability, validity, responsiveness and ease of use. * It has been validated to distinguish between disease-affected patient groups and those without rhinosinusitis, demonstrate a worse score if the condition gets worse and show an appropriateness of items and scales in the questionnaire. This has been demonstrated in 3128 British patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16620328     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01155.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  56 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Paul W Stratford; Jordi Alonso; Donald L Patrick; Ingrid Riphagen; Dirk L Knol; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Association between computed tomography findings and clinical symptoms in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps.

Authors:  Tomislav Gregurić; Vladimir Trkulja; Tomislav Baudoin; Marko Velimir Grgić; Igor Šmigovec; Livije Kalogjera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a validation of the Czech version of SNOT-22 questionnaire.

Authors:  Petr Schalek; Lukás Otruba; Ales Hahn
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Measuring the world of quality of life].

Authors:  S Maune; U Geisthoff
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  The impact of tracheostomy on the nose.

Authors:  A Tsikoudas; M L Barnes; P White
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Validating the clinical assessment of eustachian tube dysfunction: The Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7).

Authors:  Edward D McCoul; Vijay K Anand; Paul J Christos
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Quality of life following endonasal skull base surgery.

Authors:  Harshita Pant; Amol M Bhatki; Carl H Snyderman; Allan D Vescan; Ricardo L Carrau; Paul Gardner; Daniel Prevedello; Amin B Kassam
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-01

8.  Modifications to the endoscopic approach for anterior skull base lesions improve postoperative sinonasal symptoms.

Authors:  Christopher F Thompson; Jeffrey D Suh; Yuan Liu; Marvin Bergsneider; Marilene B Wang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-10-10

9.  Relationship between nasal septal deformity, symptoms and disease severity in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Tomislav Gregurić; Tomislav Baudoin; Dejan Tomljenović; Marko Grgić; Mario Štefanović; Livije Kalogjera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Assessing nasal symptom control.

Authors:  Nkiruka U Erekosima; Rohit K Katial
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.