Annina Wuokko-Landén1, Karin Blomgren2, Anni Suomalainen3, Hannamari Välimaa4,5. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. annina.wuokko@fimnet.fi. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. 3. HUS Medical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. 4. Department of Virology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. 5. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) frequently stems from a dental origin, although odontogenic sinusitis (OS) remains underdiagnosed amongst different professionals. This study aimed to explore how often odontogenic causes are considered when diagnosing CRS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient records from 374 new CRS patients treated at a tertiary-level ear, nose, and throat (ENT) clinic were selected. Entries and radiological reports were assessed exploring how often dentition was mentioned and OS was suspected, how often radiologists reported maxillary teeth, and how commonly typical OS microbial findings and unilateral symptoms occurred. RESULTS: Although 10.1% of the CRS diagnoses were connected to possible dental issues, teeth were not mentioned for 73.8% of patients. Radiological reports were available from 267 computed or cone beam computed tomographies, of which 25.1% did not mention the maxillary teeth. The reported maxillary teeth pathology was not considered in 31/64 (48.4%) cases. Unilateral symptoms associated with apical periodontitis (OR = 2.49, 95% CI 1.27-4.89, p = 0.008). Microbial samples were available from 88 patients, for whom Staphylococcus aureus was the most common finding (17% of samples). CONCLUSIONS: Odontogenic causes are often overlooked when diagnosing CRS. To provide adequate treatment, routine assessment of patient's dental history and status, careful radiograph evaluation, and utilization of microbial findings should be performed. Close cooperation with dentists is mandatory. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dental professionals should be aware of difficulties medical professionals encounter when diagnosing possible OS. Thus, sufficient knowledge of OS pathology is essential to both medical and dental professionals.
OBJECTIVES:Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) frequently stems from a dental origin, although odontogenic sinusitis (OS) remains underdiagnosed amongst different professionals. This study aimed to explore how often odontogenic causes are considered when diagnosing CRS. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patient records from 374 new CRS patients treated at a tertiary-level ear, nose, and throat (ENT) clinic were selected. Entries and radiological reports were assessed exploring how often dentition was mentioned and OS was suspected, how often radiologists reported maxillary teeth, and how commonly typical OS microbial findings and unilateral symptoms occurred. RESULTS: Although 10.1% of the CRS diagnoses were connected to possible dental issues, teeth were not mentioned for 73.8% of patients. Radiological reports were available from 267 computed or cone beam computed tomographies, of which 25.1% did not mention the maxillary teeth. The reported maxillary teeth pathology was not considered in 31/64 (48.4%) cases. Unilateral symptoms associated with apical periodontitis (OR = 2.49, 95% CI 1.27-4.89, p = 0.008). Microbial samples were available from 88 patients, for whom Staphylococcus aureus was the most common finding (17% of samples). CONCLUSIONS: Odontogenic causes are often overlooked when diagnosing CRS. To provide adequate treatment, routine assessment of patient's dental history and status, careful radiograph evaluation, and utilization of microbial findings should be performed. Close cooperation with dentists is mandatory. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dental professionals should be aware of difficulties medical professionals encounter when diagnosing possible OS. Thus, sufficient knowledge of OS pathology is essential to both medical and dental professionals.
Authors: Antti I Alakärppä; Timo J Koskenkorva; Petri T Koivunen; Olli-Pekka Alho Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Jerome R Lechien; Olivier Filleul; Pedro Costa de Araujo; Julien W Hsieh; Gilbert Chantrain; Sven Saussez Journal: Int J Otolaryngol Date: 2014-04-08
Authors: Alberto Maria Saibene; Fabio Collurà; Carlotta Pipolo; Antonio Mario Bulfamante; Paolo Lozza; Alberto Maccari; Flavio Arnone; Filippo Ghelma; Fabiana Allevi; Federico Biglioli; Matteo Chiapasco; Sara Maria Portaleone; Alberto Scotti; Roberto Borloni; Giovanni Felisati Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 2.503