Literature DB >> 23670699

Long-term utility outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery.

Luke Rudmik1, Jess Mace, Zachary M Soler, Timothy L Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To define long-term health-state utility outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, cohort study.
METHODS: The short-form (SF)-12 survey was issued to the 168 patients who were enrolled in an initial study evaluating short-term utility outcomes following ESS. SF-12 responses were converted into SF-6D utility scores using the University of Sheffield algorithm. The primary outcome was mean overall long-term utility level following ESS. Secondary outcomes evaluated annual utility level following ESS and utility outcomes for different subgroups of patients with CRS.
RESULTS: A total of 83 patients provided long-term health-state utility outcomes. The mean overall long-term utility level was 0.80 at a mean follow-up of 5.2 years after ESS. Compared to the baseline (0.67) and short-term follow-up (0.75) utility levels in this group, there was a significant improvement at the long-term period (P = .002). A total of 54% (45/83) of patients achieved long-term postoperative utility scores higher than the United States norm of 0.81. There was a significant improvement in utility scores for all subsequent years after ESS compared to preoperative responses (all P < .028). All subgroups of CRS received significant long-term utility improvements (all P < .001), and those undergoing revision ESS demonstrated continued improvement past the short-term postoperative period.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that patients with refractory CRS achieve stable mean long-term utility levels following ESS and often return to a health state comparable to US population norms.
© 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Utility; chronic rhinosinusitis; endoscopic sinus surgery; quality of life; sinusitis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23670699      PMCID: PMC3877194          DOI: 10.1002/lary.24135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  17 in total

Review 1.  The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies.

Authors:  W J Furlong; D H Feeny; G W Torrance; R D Barr
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12.

Authors:  John E Brazier; Jennifer Roberts
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Report of nationally representative values for the noninstitutionalized US adult population for 7 health-related quality-of-life scores.

Authors:  Janel Hanmer; William F Lawrence; John P Anderson; Robert M Kaplan; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  J E Siegel; M C Weinstein; L B Russell; M R Gold
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996 Oct 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  What we talk about when we talk about health care costs.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Generalizability of valuations on health states collected with the EuroQolc-questionnaire.

Authors:  M L Essink-Bot; M E Stouthard; G J Bonsel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D.

Authors:  Stephen J Walters; John E Brazier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications.

Authors:  John Horsman; William Furlong; David Feeny; George Torrance
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Surgical versus medical interventions in CRS and nasal polyps: comparative evidence between medical and surgical efficacy.

Authors:  Osama Dessouky; Claire Hopkins
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

3.  Efficacy of ESS in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyposis: a Danish cohort study.

Authors:  Henrik Lind; G Joergensen; B Lange; F Svendstrup; A D Kjeldsen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Long-term outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery in the management of adult chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Timothy L Smith; Rodney J Schlosser; Jess C Mace; Jeremiah A Alt; Daniel M Beswick; Adam S DeConde; Kara Y Detwiller; Jose L Mattos; Zachary M Soler
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.858

5.  Health utility outcomes in patients undergoing medical management for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective multiinstitutional study.

Authors:  Lauren J Luk; Toby O Steele; Jess C Mace; Zachary M Soler; Luke Rudmik; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.858

6.  Economic evaluation of endoscopic sinus surgery versus continued medical therapy for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Luke Rudmik; Zachary M Soler; Jess C Mace; Rodney J Schlosser; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 7.  Economics of Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Luke Rudmik
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.806

8.  Health utility values for patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery: a nested case control study.

Authors:  Toby O Steele; Jess C Mace; Raj Dedhia; Luke Rudmik; Timothy L Smith; Jeremiah A Alt
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.858

9.  Measurement and comparison of health utility assessments in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Elisabeth H Ference; Vanessa Stubbs; Alcina K Lidder; Rakesh K Chandra; David Conley; Pedro C Avila; Annemarie G Hirsch; Jin-Young Min; Stephanie Shintani Smith; Robert C Kern; Bruce K Tan
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.858

10.  Evaluating Surgeon-Specific Performance for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Authors:  Luke Rudmik; Yuan Xu; Jeremiah A Alt; Adam Deconde; Timothy L Smith; Rodney J Schlosser; Hude Quan; Zachary M Soler
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.