Literature DB >> 27553936

Stiffness of benign and malignant prostate tissue measured by shear-wave elastography: a preliminary study.

Olivier Rouvière1,2,3,4, Christelle Melodelima5,6, Au Hoang Dinh7, Flavie Bratan8,9,10,7, Gaele Pagnoux8, Thomas Sanzalone8,9,10, Sébastien Crouzet9,10,7,11, Marc Colombel9,10,11, Florence Mège-Lechevallier12, Rémi Souchon7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure benign and malignant prostate tissue stiffness using shear-wave elastography (SWE).
METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients underwent transrectal SWE in the axial and sagittal planes before prostatectomy. After reviewing prostatectomy specimens, two radiologists measured stiffness in regions corresponding to cancers, lateral and median benign peripheral zone (PZ) and benign transition zone (TZ).
RESULTS: Cancers were stiffer than benign PZ and TZ. All tissue classes were stiffer on sagittal than on axial imaging, in TZ than in PZ, and in median PZ than in lateral PZ. At multivariate analysis, the nature of tissue (benign or malignant; P < 0.00001), the imaging plane (axial or sagittal; P < 0.00001) and the location within the prostate (TZ, median PZ or lateral PZ; P = 0.0065) significantly and independently influenced tissue stiffness. On axial images, the thresholds maximising the Youden index in TZ, lateral PZ and median PZ were respectively 62 kPa, 33 kPa and 49 kPa. On sagittal images, the thresholds were 76 kPa, 50 kPa and 72 kPa, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: SWE can distinguish prostate malignant and benign tissues. Tissue stiffness is influenced by the imaging plane and the location within the gland. KEY POINTS: • Prostate cancers were stiffer than the benign peripheral zone • All tissue classes were stiffer on sagittal than on axial imaging • All tissue classes were stiffer in the transition zone than in the peripheral zone • All tissue classes were stiffer in the median than in the lateral peripheral zone • Taking into account imaging plane and zonal anatomy can improve cancer detection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elasticity imaging techniques; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Shear waves; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27553936     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4534-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate.

Authors:  P Gibbs; D J Tozer; G P Liney; L W Turnbull
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of the human prostate.

Authors:  Shantanu Sinha; Usha Sinha
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling.

Authors:  Hemamali Samaratunga; Rodolfo Montironi; Lawrence True; Jonathan I Epstein; David F Griffiths; Peter A Humphrey; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas M Wheeler; John R Srigley; Brett Delahunt; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by supersonic shear imaging.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Gennisson; Thomas Deffieux; Emilie Macé; Gabriel Montaldo; Mathias Fink; Mickaël Tanter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Effects of precompression on elasticity imaging of the breast: development of a clinically useful semiquantitative method of precompression assessment.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Zheng Zhang
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Prediction of Significant Prostate Cancer at Prostate Biopsy and Per Core Detection Rate of Targeted and Systematic Biopsies Using Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography.

Authors:  Katharina Boehm; Lars Budäus; Pierre Tennstedt; Burkhard Beyer; Jonas Schiffmann; Alessandro Larcher; Kathrin Simonis; Markus Graefen; Dirk Beyersdorff; Georg Salomon
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Richard Memo; Carl R Schaub
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.657

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivo G Schoots; Monique J Roobol; Daan Nieboer; Chris H Bangma; Ewout W Steyerberg; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study.

Authors:  Flavie Bratan; Emilie Niaf; Christelle Melodelima; Anne Laure Chesnais; Rémi Souchon; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Marc Colombel; Olivier Rouvière
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Sang Youn Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Seung Hyup Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  21 in total

1.  Shear-wave elastography can evaluate annulus fibrosus alteration in adolescent scoliosis.

Authors:  Tristan Langlais; Claudio Vergari; Raphael Pietton; Jean Dubousset; Wafa Skalli; Raphael Vialle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Machine learning for medical ultrasound: status, methods, and future opportunities.

Authors:  Laura J Brattain; Brian A Telfer; Manish Dhyani; Joseph R Grajo; Anthony E Samir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-04

3.  Computer simulations suggest that prostate enlargement due to benign prostatic hyperplasia mechanically impedes prostate cancer growth.

Authors:  Guillermo Lorenzo; Thomas J R Hughes; Pablo Dominguez-Frojan; Alessandro Reali; Hector Gomez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Advanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Correas; Ethan J Halpern; Richard G Barr; Sangeet Ghai; Jochen Walz; Sylvain Bodard; Charles Dariane; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Prostate zones and cancer: lost in transition?

Authors:  Amin Ali; Alexander Du Feu; Pedro Oliveira; Ananya Choudhury; Robert G Bristow; Esther Baena
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Physical traits of cancer.

Authors:  Hadi T Nia; Lance L Munn; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  New and Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Other Abdominal Organs.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Ying Deng; Danielle Jondal; David M Woodrum; Yu Shi; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10

Review 8.  Principles of ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Arinc Ozturk; Joseph R Grajo; Manish Dhyani; Brian W Anthony; Anthony E Samir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-04

9.  Stiffness of prostate gland measured by transrectal real-time shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Yonghao Ji; Litao Ruan; Wei Ren; Guoliang Dun; Jianxue Liu; Yaoren Zhang; Qinyun Wan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  The challenge of prostate biopsy guidance in the era of mpMRI detected lesion: ultrasound-guided versus in-bore biopsy.

Authors:  Auke Jager; Joan C Vilanova; Massimo Michi; Hessel Wijkstra; Jorg R Oddens
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.