Literature DB >> 22644686

Effects of precompression on elasticity imaging of the breast: development of a clinically useful semiquantitative method of precompression assessment.

Richard G Barr1, Zheng Zhang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Elastography of the breast is a new technique for characterization of breast lesions. The reproducibility of elastographic techniques has been questioned. Precompression is known to effect elastographic results. This study determined the effect of precompression on clinical images and proposes a method to semiquantify the amount of precompression applied.
METHODS: Ten patients with different breast tissue types were evaluated with shear wave and strain elastography with varying amounts of precompression. The changes in the shear wave speed and images were documented. A semiquantitative method for determining the amount of precompression applied is presented. The reproducibility of the technique was determine by repeated measurements by 3 sonographers.
RESULTS: Precompression substantially changes the elastographic results of patient images on both strain and shear wave elastography. Fat can have the same elasticity as cancer with clinically possible amounts of precompression. The proposed method for determining the amount of precompression applied has variability of less than 10%, which is within the error of the technique and would not affect clinical results. Four zones of precompression are identified, which are useful for explaining the effects of precompression on both strain and shear wave imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: Precompression is a substantial factor in obtaining accurate results with elastography. A proposed simple, easily applied technique can be used to semiquantify the amount of precompression applied. Precompression should be minimized in obtaining breast clinical images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22644686     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.6.895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  52 in total

1.  The diagnosis value of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography for thyroid malignancy without highly suspicious features on conventional ultrasound.

Authors:  Bo-Ji Liu; Feng Lu; Hui-Xiong Xu; Le-Hang Guo; Dan-Dan Li; Xiao-Wan Bo; Xiao-Long Li; Yi-Feng Zhang; Jun-Mei Xu; Xiao-Hong Xu; Shen Qu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Hye Mi Gweon; Eun Ju Son; Kyung Hwa Han; Jeong-Ah Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Breast tissue stiffness estimation for surgical guidance using gravity-induced excitation.

Authors:  Rebekah H Griesenauer; Jared A Weis; Lori R Arlinghaus; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Characterization of transverse isotropy in compressed tissue-mimicking phantoms.

Authors:  Matthew W Urban; Manuela Lopera; Sara Aristizabal; Carolina Amador; Ivan Nenadic; Randall R Kinnick; Alexander D Weston; Bo Qiang; Xiaoming Zhang; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Comb-push ultrasound shear elastography (CUSE) for evaluation of thyroid nodules: preliminary in vivo results.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehrmohammadi; Pengfei Song; Duane D Meixner; Robert T Fazzio; Shigao Chen; James F Greenleaf; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 6.  JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: breast.

Authors:  Kazutaka Nakashima; Tsuyoshi Shiina; Masaru Sakurai; Katsutoshi Enokido; Tokiko Endo; Hiroko Tsunoda; Etsuo Takada; Takeshi Umemoto; Ei Ueno
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 7.  JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: basics and terminology.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Shiina
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 1.314

8.  Ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of nipple retraction.

Authors:  Duzgun Yildirim; Mutlu Sahin; Onur Tutar; Huseyin Kayadibi; Ahmet Kaur; Ali Kagan Coskun; Terman Gumus
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 1.314

9.  Comparison of strain and shear-wave ultrasounic elastography in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Shuo Zhang; Jing Li; Jianyi Li; Ye Kang; Weidong Ren
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Modeling Uncertainty of Strain Ratio Measurements in Ultrasound Breast Strain Elastography: A Factorial Experiment.

Authors:  David Rosen; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.