Literature DB >> 27552303

Factors impacting cerebrospinal fluid leak rates in endoscopic sellar surgery.

Tom T Karnezis1, Andrew B Baker2, Zachary M Soler2, Sarah K Wise3, Shruthi K Rereddy3, Zara M Patel3, Nelson M Oyesiku4, John M DelGaudio3, Constantinos G Hadjipanayis3, Bradford A Woodworth5, Kristen O Riley6, John Lee7, Michael D Cusimano8, Satish Govindaraj9, Alkis Psaltis10, Peter John Wormald10, Steve Santoreneos11, Raj Sindwani12, Samuel Trosman12, Janalee K Stokken13, Troy D Woodard12, Pablo F Recinos12, W Alexander Vandergrift14, Rodney J Schlosser2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing transnasal endoscopic sellar surgery, an analysis of risk factors and predictors of intraoperative and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (CSF) would provide important prognostic information.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing endoscopic sellar surgery for pituitary adenomas or craniopharyngiomas between 2002 and 2014 at 7 international centers was performed. Demographic, comorbidity, and tumor characteristics were evaluated to determine the associations between intraoperative and postoperative CSF leaks. Correlations between reconstructive and CSF diversion techniques were associated with postoperative CSF leak rates. Odds ratios (OR) were identified using a multivariate logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Data were collected on 1108 pituitary adenomas and 53 craniopharyngiomas. Overall, 30.1% of patients had an intraoperative leak and 5.9% had a postoperative leak. Preoperative factors associated with increased intraoperative leaks were mild liver disease, craniopharyngioma, and extension into the anterior cranial fossa. In patients with intraoperative CSF leaks, postoperative leaks occurred in 10.3%, with a higher postoperative leak rate in craniopharyngiomas (20.8% vs 5.1% in pituitary adenomas). Once an intraoperative leak occurred, craniopharyngioma (OR = 4.255, p = 0.010) and higher body mass index (BMI) predicted postoperative leak (OR = 1.055, p = 0.010). In patients with an intraoperative leak, the use of septal flaps reduced the occurrence of postoperative leak (OR = 0.431, p = 0.027). Rigid reconstruction and CSF diversion techniques did not impact postoperative leak rates.
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative CSF leaks can occur during endoscopic sellar surgery, especially in larger tumors or craniopharyngiomas. Once an intraoperative leak occurs, risk factors for postoperative leaks include craniopharyngiomas and higher BMI. Use of septal flaps decreases this risk.
© 2016 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  craniopharyngioma; intraoperative leak; pituitary tumor; postoperative leak; skull base reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27552303     DOI: 10.1002/alr.21783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  17 in total

1.  Development of Chronic Sphenoid Sinusitis After Sellar Reconstruction with Medpor Porous Polyethylene Implant.

Authors:  Nyssa Fox Farrell; Todd T Kingdom; Anne E Getz; Kevin O Lillehei; A Samy Youssef; Vijay R Ramakrishnan
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Predictive Factors, 30-Day Clinical Outcomes, and Costs Associated with Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak in Pituitary Adenoma Resection.

Authors:  Adish Parikh; Arjun Adapa; Stephen E Sullivan; Erin L McKean
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-18

3.  Calcified Prolactinoma of the Pituitary Gland: Illustrative Case Reports Highlighting Medical versus Surgical Intervention.

Authors:  Sherwin Tavakol; Asma Hasan; Michelle A Wedemeyer; Joshua Bakhsheshian; Chia-Shang J Liu; Mark S Shiroishi; Anna Mathew; John D Carmichael; Gabriel Zada
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-05

4.  Characteristics and overall survival in pediatric versus adult craniopharyngioma: a population-based study.

Authors:  Brandon M Lehrich; Khodayar Goshtasbi; Frank P K Hsu; Edward C Kuan
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Heterogeneity in Outcome Reporting in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina Dorismond; Griffin D Santarelli; Brian D Thorp; Adam J Kimple; Charles S Ebert; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-07

6.  Sinonasal Packing is Not a Requisite for Successful Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Repair.

Authors:  Karam Asmaro; Frederick Yoo; Abdulkader Yassin-Kassab; Michael Bazydlo; Adam M Robin; Jack P Rock; John R Craig
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-12-17

7.  Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Intraoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mattogno; Valerio M Caccavella; Martina Giordano; Quintino G D'Alessandris; Sabrina Chiloiro; Leonardo Tariciotti; Alessandro Olivi; Liverana Lauretti
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2022-01-16

8.  Transsphenoidal Surgery of Giant Pituitary Adenoma: Results and Experience of 239 Cases in A Single Center.

Authors:  Yike Chen; Xiaohui Xu; Jing Cao; Yuanqing Jie; Linkai Wang; Feng Cai; Sheng Chen; Wei Yan; Yuan Hong; Jianmin Zhang; Qun Wu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.055

9.  Transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: comparison of two sellar reconstruction techniques and their effect on postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage.

Authors:  Patrick Schuss; Alexis Hadjiathanasiou; Dietrich Klingmüller; Ági Güresir; Hartmut Vatter; Erdem Güresir
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 10.  Preoperative risk factors for postoperative complications in endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel J Lobatto; Friso de Vries; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Alberto M Pereira; Wilco C Peul; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Nienke R Biermasz; Wouter R van Furth
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.