Literature DB >> 36091635

Sinonasal Packing is Not a Requisite for Successful Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Repair.

Karam Asmaro1, Frederick Yoo2, Abdulkader Yassin-Kassab3, Michael Bazydlo4, Adam M Robin1, Jack P Rock1, John R Craig2.   

Abstract

Background  Numerous methods have been described to repair nasal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Most studies have focused on optimizing CSF leak repair success, leading to closure rates of 90 to 95%. Objective  This study aimed to determine if excellent reconstruction rates could be achieved without using sinonasal packing. Methods  A prospective case series of 73 consecutive patients with various CSF leak etiologies and skull base defects was conducted to evaluate reconstruction success without sinonasal packing. The primary outcome measure was postoperative CSF leak. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative epistaxis requiring intervention in operating room or emergency department, infectious sinusitis, and 22-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) changes. Results  Mean age was 54.5 years and 64% were female. Multilayered reconstructions were performed in 55.3% of cases, with collagen or bone epidural inlay grafts, and nasal mucosal grafts or nasoseptal flaps for onlay layers. Onlay-only reconstructions with mucosal grafts or nasoseptal flaps were performed in 44.7% of cases. Tissue sealants were used in all cases, and lumbar drains were used in 40.8% of cases. There were two initial failures (97.4% initial success), but both resolved with lumbar drains alone (no revision surgeries). There were no instances of postoperative epistaxis requiring intervention in the operating room or emergency department. Infectious sinusitis occurred in 2.7% of patients in the first 3 months postoperatively. SNOT-22 did not change significantly from preoperatively to first postoperative visits, then improved over time. Conclusion  Nasal CSF leaks from various etiologies and defect sites were successfully repaired without using sinonasal packing, and patients experienced minimal sinonasal morbidity. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF rhinorrhea; SNOT-22; endoscopic sinus; endoscopic skull base surgery; quality of life; sinonasal packing; skull base reconstruction; skull base repair; surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 36091635      PMCID: PMC9462960          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  44 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: a systematic review of published evidence.

Authors:  Richard J Harvey; Priscilla Parmar; Raymond Sacks; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Endoscopic reconstruction of large anterior skull base defects using acellular dermal allograft.

Authors:  Ross M Germani; Richard Vivero; Islam R Herzallah; Roy R Casiano
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Endoscopic reconstruction of surgically created skull base defects: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ethan Soudry; Justin H Turner; Jayakar V Nayak; Peter H Hwang
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Effect of lumbar drain placement on recurrence of cerebrospinal rhinorrhea after endoscopic repair.

Authors:  Nadieska Caballero; Vidur Bhalla; James A Stankiewicz; Kevin C Welch
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.858

5.  Factors impacting cerebrospinal fluid leak rates in endoscopic sellar surgery.

Authors:  Tom T Karnezis; Andrew B Baker; Zachary M Soler; Sarah K Wise; Shruthi K Rereddy; Zara M Patel; Nelson M Oyesiku; John M DelGaudio; Constantinos G Hadjipanayis; Bradford A Woodworth; Kristen O Riley; John Lee; Michael D Cusimano; Satish Govindaraj; Alkis Psaltis; Peter John Wormald; Steve Santoreneos; Raj Sindwani; Samuel Trosman; Janalee K Stokken; Troy D Woodard; Pablo F Recinos; W Alexander Vandergrift; Rodney J Schlosser
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.858

6.  Outcomes of endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea without lumbar drains.

Authors:  Austin S Adams; Paul T Russell; James A Duncavage; Rakesh K Chandra; Justin H Turner
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.467

7.  International consensus statement on endoscopic skull-base surgery: executive summary.

Authors:  Eric W Wang; Paul A Gardner; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.858

8.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Michael Wall
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.806

9.  Prospective, double-blind, randomized trial evaluating patient satisfaction, bleeding, and wound healing using biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam (NasoPore) as a middle meatal spacer in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Nael Shoman; Heitham Gheriani; David Flamer; Amin Javer
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-02

10.  Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery.

Authors:  Adam M Zanation; Ricardo L Carrau; Carl H Snyderman; Anand V Germanwala; Paul A Gardner; Daniel M Prevedello; Amin B Kassam
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.467

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.