Literature DB >> 36091632

Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Intraoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Pier Paolo Mattogno1, Valerio M Caccavella1, Martina Giordano1, Quintino G D'Alessandris1, Sabrina Chiloiro2, Leonardo Tariciotti3,4, Alessandro Olivi1, Liverana Lauretti1.   

Abstract

Purpose  Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) for pituitary adenomas can be complicated by the occurrence of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage (IOL). IOL significantly affects the course of surgery predisposing to the development of postoperative CSF leakage, a major source of morbidity and mortality in the postoperative period. The authors trained and internally validated the Random Forest (RF) prediction model to preoperatively identify patients at high risk for IOL. A locally interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) algorithm is employed to elucidate the main drivers behind each machine learning (ML) model prediction. Methods  The data of 210 patients who underwent TSS were collected; first, risk factors for IOL were identified via conventional statistical methods (multivariable logistic regression). Then, the authors trained, optimized, and audited a RF prediction model. Results  IOL reported in 45 patients (21.5%). The recursive feature selection algorithm identified the following variables as the most significant determinants of IOL: Knosp's grade, sellar Hardy's grade, suprasellar Hardy's grade, tumor diameter (on X, Y, and Z axes), intercarotid distance, and secreting status (nonfunctioning and growth hormone [GH] secreting). Leveraging the predictive values of these variables, the RF prediction model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78; 0.86), significantly outperforming the multivariable logistic regression model (AUC = 0.63). Conclusion  A RF model that reliably identifies patients at risk for IOL was successfully trained and internally validated. ML-based prediction models can predict events that were previously judged nearly unpredictable; their deployment in clinical practice may result in improved patient care and reduced postoperative morbidity and healthcare costs. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebrospinal fluid leak; machine learning; pituitary adenoma; pituitary surgery; random forest; transsphenoidal surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 36091632      PMCID: PMC9462964          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  32 in total

1.  Neural network-based identification of patients at high risk for intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks in endoscopic pituitary surgery.

Authors:  Victor E Staartjes; Costanza M Zattra; Kevin Akeret; Nicolai Maldaner; Giovanni Muscas; Christiaan Hendrik Bas van Niftrik; Jorn Fierstra; Luca Regli; Carlo Serra
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Risk Factors for Intraoperative and Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Sellar Surgery.

Authors:  Priyesh N Patel; Alicia M Stafford; James R Patrinely; Derek K Smith; Justin H Turner; Paul T Russell; Kyle D Weaver; Lola B Chambless; Rakesh K Chandra
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Microsurgical versus endoscopic transsphenoidal resection for acromegaly: a systematic review of outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Ching-Jen Chen; Natasha Ironside; I Jonathan Pomeraniec; Srinivas Chivukula; Thomas J Buell; Dale Ding; Davis G Taylor; Robert F Dallapiazza; Cheng-Chia Lee; Marvin Bergsneider
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  The 3F (Fat, Flap, and Flash) Technique For Skull Base Reconstruction After Endoscopic Endonasal Suprasellar Approach.

Authors:  Luigi M Cavallo; Domenico Solari; Teresa Somma; Paolo Cappabianca
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Pituitary hormonal loss and recovery after transsphenoidal adenoma removal.

Authors:  Nasrin Fatemi; Joshua R Dusick; Carlos Mattozo; David L McArthur; Pejman Cohan; John Boscardin; Christina Wang; Ronald S Swerdloff; Daniel F Kelly
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Identification and repair of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks in endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: surgical experience in a series of 1002 patients.

Authors:  Ben A Strickland; Joshua Lucas; Brianna Harris; Edwin Kulubya; Joshua Bakhsheshian; Charles Liu; Bozena Wrobel; John D Carmichael; Martin Weiss; Gabriel Zada
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Relationship between pituitary adenoma texture and collagen content revealed by comparative study of MRI and pathology analysis.

Authors:  Liangfeng Wei; Shun-An Lin; Kaichun Fan; Deyong Xiao; Jingfang Hong; Shousen Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

8.  Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Johannes B Reitsma; Douglas G Altman; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea following transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: experience in a Chinese centre.

Authors:  C Zhang; X Ding; Y Lu; L Hu; G Hu
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Comparison between Random Forests, Artificial Neural Networks and Gradient Boosted Machines Methods of On-Line Vis-NIR Spectroscopy Measurements of Soil Total Nitrogen and Total Carbon.

Authors:  Said Nawar; Abdul M Mouazen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.