Nyssa Fox Farrell1, Todd T Kingdom1, Anne E Getz1, Kevin O Lillehei2, A Samy Youssef3, Vijay R Ramakrishnan4. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 4. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. Electronic address: vijay.ramakrishnan@ucdenver.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Medpor porous polyethylene implant is reported to be safe and effective for sellar reconstruction after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). However, we have observed several cases of delayed chronic sphenoid sinusitis related to the implant. The purpose of this study is to describe the presentation and management of implant-related sphenoid sinusitis after sellar reconstruction. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent endonasal TSS with Medpor sellar reconstruction between December 2008 and January 2013 at a tertiary care institution. Patient demographics, initial surgical management, sinonasal symptoms, postoperative imaging, sinusitis management, and resulting outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: From 2008-2013, 139 patients underwent sellar reconstruction using Medpor. Five patients (3.6%) presented between 8 and 60 months after surgery with chronic sphenoid sinusitis that required surgical management. All 5 patients presented as outpatients for management of headaches and nasal drainage, 4 patients experienced chronic nasal congestion, and 3 patients noted recurrent sinusitis. At the time of revision surgery, all 5 patients were found to have mucosal inflammation and edema surrounding the implant, and 4 of the 5 had an exposed or partially extruded implant that was removed. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of the sellar floor may be performed after TSS to prevent postoperative complications. Although porous polyethylene implants have previously been described as safe and effective for this purpose, surgeons should be aware of the risk of subsequent implant extrusion and chronic sphenoid sinusitis that can occur in a delayed manner.
OBJECTIVE: The Medpor porous polyethylene implant is reported to be safe and effective for sellar reconstruction after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). However, we have observed several cases of delayed chronic sphenoid sinusitis related to the implant. The purpose of this study is to describe the presentation and management of implant-related sphenoid sinusitis after sellar reconstruction. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent endonasal TSS with Medpor sellar reconstruction between December 2008 and January 2013 at a tertiary care institution. Patient demographics, initial surgical management, sinonasal symptoms, postoperative imaging, sinusitis management, and resulting outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: From 2008-2013, 139 patients underwent sellar reconstruction using Medpor. Five patients (3.6%) presented between 8 and 60 months after surgery with chronic sphenoid sinusitis that required surgical management. All 5 patients presented as outpatients for management of headaches and nasal drainage, 4 patients experienced chronic nasal congestion, and 3 patients noted recurrent sinusitis. At the time of revision surgery, all 5 patients were found to have mucosal inflammation and edema surrounding the implant, and 4 of the 5 had an exposed or partially extruded implant that was removed. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of the sellar floor may be performed after TSS to prevent postoperative complications. Although porous polyethylene implants have previously been described as safe and effective for this purpose, surgeons should be aware of the risk of subsequent implant extrusion and chronic sphenoid sinusitis that can occur in a delayed manner.
Authors: James K Liu; Oren N Gottfried; Chad D Cole; William R Dougherty; William T Couldwell Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: D Locatelli; M Vitali; V M Custodi; P Scagnelli; P Castelnuovo; F R Canevari Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Leah M Feazel; Sarah A Gitomer; Diana Ir; Charles E Robertson; Daniel N Frank Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Danyal Z Khan; Ahmad M S Ali; Chan Hee Koh; Neil L Dorward; Joan Grieve; Hugo Layard Horsfall; William Muirhead; Thomas Santarius; Wouter R Van Furth; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Hani J Marcus Journal: Pituitary Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.107