Literature DB >> 27538124

A Methodology for the Derivation of Unloaded Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Geometry With Experimental Validation.

Santanu Chandra, Vimalatharmaiyah Gnanaruban, Fabian Riveros, Jose F Rodriguez, Ender A Finol.   

Abstract

In this work, we present a novel method for the derivation of the unloaded geometry of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) from a pressurized geometry in turn obtained by 3D reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) images. The approach was experimentally validated with an aneurysm phantom loaded with gauge pressures of 80, 120, and 140 mm Hg. The unloaded phantom geometries estimated from these pressurized states were compared to the actual unloaded phantom geometry, resulting in mean nodal surface distances of up to 3.9% of the maximum aneurysm diameter. An in-silico verification was also performed using a patient-specific AAA mesh, resulting in maximum nodal surface distances of 8 μm after running the algorithm for eight iterations. The methodology was then applied to 12 patient-specific AAA for which their corresponding unloaded geometries were generated in 5-8 iterations. The wall mechanics resulting from finite element analysis of the pressurized (CT image-based) and unloaded geometries were compared to quantify the relative importance of using an unloaded geometry for AAA biomechanics. The pressurized AAA models underestimate peak wall stress (quantified by the first principal stress component) on average by 15% compared to the unloaded AAA models. The validation and application of the method, readily compatible with any finite element solver, underscores the importance of generating the unloaded AAA volume mesh prior to using wall stress as a biomechanical marker for rupture risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27538124      PMCID: PMC5013432          DOI: 10.1115/1.4034425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  36 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry.

Authors:  Judy Shum; Giampaolo Martufi; Elena Di Martino; Christopher B Washington; Joseph Grisafi; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue.

Authors:  Elena S Di Martino; Ajay Bohra; Jonathan P Vande Geest; Navyash Gupta; Michel S Makaroun; David A Vorp
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Fluid-structure interaction modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the impact of patient-specific inflow conditions and fluid/solid coupling.

Authors:  Santanu Chandra; Samarth S Raut; Anirban Jana; Robert W Biederman; Mark Doyle; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Yannis Papaharilaou; John A Ekaterinaris; Eirini Manousaki; Asterios N Katsamouris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: the role of clinical examination and opportunistic detection.

Authors:  C D Karkos; U Mukhopadhyay; I Papakostas; J Ghosh; G J Thomson; R Hughes
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  Cardiovascular disease and mortality in older adults with small abdominal aortic aneurysms detected by ultrasonography: the cardiovascular health study.

Authors:  A B Newman; A M Arnold; G L Burke; D H O'Leary; T A Manolio
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Prestressing in finite deformation abdominal aortic aneurysm simulation.

Authors:  M W Gee; C Reeps; H H Eckstein; W A Wall
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy.

Authors:  José F Rodríguez; Cristina Ruiz; Manuel Doblaré; Gerhard A Holzapfel
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Intraluminal thrombus and risk of rupture in patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysm - FSI modelling.

Authors:  Danny Bluestein; Kris Dumont; Matthieu De Beule; John Ricotta; Paul Impellizzeri; Benedict Verhegghe; Pascal Verdonck
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.763

10.  Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models.

Authors:  James H Leung; Andrew R Wright; Nick Cheshire; Jeremy Crane; Simon A Thom; Alun D Hughes; Yun Xu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  2 in total

1.  On the relative impact of intraluminal thrombus heterogeneity on abdominal aortic aneurysm mechanics.

Authors:  Joseph Leach; Evan Kao; Chengcheng Zhu; David Saloner; Michael D Hope
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  4D Flow MRI Estimation of Boundary Conditions for Patient Specific Cardiovascular Simulation.

Authors:  Ryan Pewowaruk; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.934

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.