Literature DB >> 31253989

On the relative impact of intraluminal thrombus heterogeneity on abdominal aortic aneurysm mechanics.

Joseph Leach1, Evan Kao2, Chengcheng Zhu2, David Saloner2, Michael D Hope2.   

Abstract

Intraluminal thrombus (ILT) is present in the majority of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) of a size warranting consideration for surgical or endovascular intervention. The rupture risk of AAAs is thought to be related to the balance of vessel wall strength and the mechanical stress caused by systemic blood pressure. Previous finite element analyses of AAAs have shown that ILT can reduce and homogenize aneurysm wall stress. These works have largely considered ILT to be homogeneous in mechanical character or have idealized a stiffness distribution through the thrombus thickness. In this work, we use MRI to delineate the heterogeneous composition of ILT in 7 AAAs and perform patient-specific finite element analysis under multiple conditions of ILT layer stiffness disparity. We find that explicit incorporation of ILT heterogeneity in the finite element analysis is unlikely to substantially alter major stress analysis predictions regarding aneurysm rupture risk in comparison to models assuming a homogenous thrombus, provided that the maximal ILT stiffness is the same between models. Our results also show that under a homogeneous ILT assumption, the choice of ILT stiffness from values common in the literature can result in significantly larger variations in stress predictions compared to the effects of thrombus heterogeneity.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31253989      PMCID: PMC6808003          DOI: 10.1115/1.4044143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  46 in total

1.  Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability.

Authors:  M L Raghavan; D A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction.

Authors:  A Maier; M W Gee; C Reeps; J Pongratz; H-H Eckstein; W A Wall
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a surgical emergency with many clinical presentations.

Authors:  A N Assar; C K Zarins
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  On the Impact of Intraluminal Thrombus Mechanical Behavior in AAA Passive Mechanics.

Authors:  Fabián Riveros; Giampaolo Martufi; T Christian Gasser; Jose F Rodriguez-Matas
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Isotropic 3D black blood MRI of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall and intraluminal thrombus.

Authors:  Chengcheng Zhu; Henrik Haraldsson; Farshid Faraji; Christopher Owens; Warren Gasper; Sinyeob Ahn; Jing Liu; Gerhard Laub; Michael D Hope; David Saloner
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Trans-thrombus blood pressure effects in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Clark A Meyer; Carine Guivier-Curien; James E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Predicting the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms by utilizing various geometrical parameters: revisiting the diameter criterion.

Authors:  G Giannoglou; G Giannakoulas; J Soulis; Y Chatzizisis; T Perdikides; N Melas; G Parcharidis; G Louridas
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2006 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  In vivo three-dimensional surface geometry of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  M S Sacks; D A Vorp; M L Raghavan; M P Federle; M W Webster
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Rupture in small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  S C Nicholls; J B Gardner; M H Meissner; H K Johansen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 10.  The role of geometric and biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment.

Authors:  Samarth S Raut; Santanu Chandra; Judy Shum; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.934

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Disturbed flow's impact on cellular changes indicative of vascular aneurysm initiation, expansion, and rupture: A pathological and methodological review.

Authors:  Kevin Sunderland; Jingfeng Jiang; Feng Zhao
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 6.384

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.