Literature DB >> 16500664

A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Yannis Papaharilaou1, John A Ekaterinaris, Eirini Manousaki, Asterios N Katsamouris.   

Abstract

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a localized dilatation of the aortic wall. The lack of an accurate AAA rupture risk index remains an important problem in the clinical management of the disease. To accurately estimate AAA rupture risk, detailed information on patient-specific wall stress distribution and aortic wall tissue yield stress is required. A complete fluid structure interaction (FSI) study is currently impractical and thus of limited clinical value. On the other hand, isolated static structural stress analysis based on a uniform wall loading is a widely used approach for AAA rupture risk estimation that, however, neglects the flow-induced wall stress variation. The aim of this study was to assess the merit of a decoupled fluid structure analysis of AAA wall stress. Anatomically correct, patient specific AAA wall models were created by 3D reconstruction of computed tomography images. Flow simulations were carried out with inflow and outflow boundary conditions obtained from patient extracted data. Static structural stress analysis was performed applying both a uniform pressure wall loading and a flow induced non-uniform pressure distribution obtained during early systolic deceleration. For the structural analysis, a hyperelastic arterial wall model and an elastic intraluminal thrombus model were assumed. The results of this study demonstrate that although the isolated static structural stress analysis approach captures the gross features of the stress distribution it underestimates the magnitude of the peak wall stress by as much as 12.5% compared to the proposed decoupled fluid structure approach. Furthermore, the decoupled approach provides potentially useful information on the nature of the aneurysmal sac flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16500664     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  21 in total

1.  Fluid-structure interaction modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the impact of patient-specific inflow conditions and fluid/solid coupling.

Authors:  Santanu Chandra; Samarth S Raut; Anirban Jana; Robert W Biederman; Mark Doyle; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  In vivo three-dimensional MR wall shear stress estimation in ascending aortic dilatation.

Authors:  Erik T Bieging; Alex Frydrychowicz; Andrew Wentland; Benjamin R Landgraf; Kevin M Johnson; Oliver Wieben; Christopher J François
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  A Methodology for the Derivation of Unloaded Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Geometry With Experimental Validation.

Authors:  Santanu Chandra; Vimalatharmaiyah Gnanaruban; Fabian Riveros; Jose F Rodriguez; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Progression of abdominal aortic aneurysm towards rupture: refining clinical risk assessment using a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction method.

Authors:  Michalis Xenos; Nicos Labropoulos; Suraj Rambhia; Yared Alemu; Shmuel Einav; Apostolos Tassiopoulos; Natzi Sakalihasan; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  The effect of angulation in abdominal aortic aneurysms: fluid-structure interaction simulations of idealized geometries.

Authors:  Michalis Xenos; Yared Alemu; Dan Zamfir; Shmuel Einav; John J Ricotta; Nicos Labropoulos; Apostolos Tassiopoulos; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Identification of rupture locations in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms using experimental and computational techniques.

Authors:  Barry J Doyle; Aidan J Cloonan; Michael T Walsh; David A Vorp; Timothy M McGloughlin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Towards patient-specific risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  M Breeuwer; S de Putter; U Kose; L Speelman; K Visser; F Gerritsen; R Hoogeveen; R Krams; H van den Bosch; J Buth; T Gunther; B Wolters; E van Dam; F van de Vosse
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 8.  The role of geometric and biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment.

Authors:  Samarth S Raut; Santanu Chandra; Judy Shum; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Interaction of expanding abdominal aortic aneurysm with surrounding tissue: Retrospective CT image studies.

Authors:  Sebastian T Kwon; William Burek; Alexander C Dupay; Mehdi Farsad; Seungik Baek; Eun-Ah Park; Whal Lee
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2015-08

10.  Hemodynamic impact of abdominal aortic aneurysm stent-graft implantation-induced stenosis.

Authors:  Nicolas Aristokleous; Nikolaos G Kontopodis; Konstantinos Tzirakis; Christos V Ioannou; Yannis Papaharilaou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.