| Literature DB >> 27536040 |
Lopamudra Haldar1, D N Gandhi2.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the effect of oral administration of two Bacillus strains on fecal coliforms, Lactobacillus and Bacillus spp. in rat animal model.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus coagulans; Bacillus pumilus; acid salt tolerance; antibacterial activity; bile salt tolerance; probiotics
Year: 2016 PMID: 27536040 PMCID: PMC4983130 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.766-772
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Figure-1Trend in mean±standard error of mean fecal coliform count (colony-forming units/g fecal sample) in different groups of rat. Rats were fed with cholesterol-enriched diet from 0 up to 35th day cholesterol-enriched diet. The diets were supplemented with control - water (•); T1 - Skim milk (○); T2 - non-fermented skim milk with B37 isolate (×); T3- non-fermented skim milk with B9 isolate from 15th day up to 35th day (▴). ⋆⋆indicates fecal coliform count among different groups differ significantly (p<0.01).
Figure-2Trend in mean±standard error of mean fecal lactic acid bacteria (LAB) count (colony-forming units/g fecal sample) in different groups of rat. Rats were fed with cholesterol-enriched diet from 0 up to 35th day cholesterol-enriched diet. The diets were supplemented with control - water (•); T1 - skim milk (○); T2 - non-fermented skim milk with B37 isolate (×); T3 - non-fermented skim milk with B9 isolate from 15th up to 35th day (▴). Fecal LAB count among different groups differ significantly (p<0.05). ⋆Indicates fecal lactobacilli count among different groups differ significantly (p<0.05).
Figure-3Trend in mean±standard error of mean fecal Bacillus count (colony-forming units/g fecal sample) in different groups of the rat. Rats were fed with cholesterol-enriched diet from 0 up to 35th day cholesterol-enriched diet. The diets were supplemented with control - water (•); T1 - skim milk (○); T2 - non-fermented skim milk with B37 isolate (×); T3 - non-fermented skim milk with B9 isolate from 15th day up to 35th day (▴). ⋆⋆indicates fecal Bacillus count among different groups differ significantly (p<0.01).
In vitro acid tolerance of the selected Bacillus isolates.
| Isolate | Bacterial count (cfu/ml) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At pH 6.4 | At pH 1.0 | At pH 2.0 | At pH 3.0 | |||||||||||||
| 0 h | 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | 0 h | 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | 0 h | 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | 0 h | 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | |
| 8.64 | 8.11 | 8.34 | 8.49 | 3.69 | 2.23 | - | - | 6.18 | 5.85 | 5.28 | 5.36 | 6.81 | 6.73 | 6.53 | 6.11 | |
| 8.86 | 8.79 | 8.18 | 7.96 | 6.32 | 5.67 | 3.51 | 2.11 | 7.86 | 6.36 | 6.23 | 5.85 | 7.96 | 7.59 | 7.18 | 6.87 | |
cfu=Colony-forming units
In vitro bile tolerance of the selected Bacillus isolates.
| Isolate | Bacterial count (cfu/ml) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 0.0% bile | At 1.0% bile | At 2.0% bile | ||||||||||
| 0 h | 1 h | 3 h | 12 h | 0 h | 1 h | 3 h | 12 h | 0 h | 1 h | 3 h | 12 h | |
| 8.15 | 7.60 | 8.15 | 7.95 | 7.46 | 6.11 | 6.86 | 6.81 | 6.28 | 5.62 | 5.48 | 5.53 | |
| 8.75 | 8.15 | 7.99 | 7.85 | 6.43 | 5.95 | 5.64 | 6.28 | 5.70 | 5.36 | 4.59 | 4.87 | |
cfu=Colony-forming units