Literature DB >> 25062611

Evaluation of Bacillus subtilis R0179 on gastrointestinal viability and general wellness: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in healthy adults.

A Hanifi1, T Culpepper2, V Mai2, A Anand2, A L Ford1, M Ukhanova2, M Christman3, T A Tompkins4, W J Dahl1.   

Abstract

A probiotic formulation of Enterococcus faecium R0026 and Bacillus subtilis R0179 has been evaluated in previous clinical trials. However, B. subtilis R0179 has not been evaluated as a single probiotic strain or in combination with other strains at doses higher than 0.1×109 cfu. To establish oral dose-response tolerance and gastrointestinal (GI) viability of B. subtilis R0179, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in healthy adults (n=81; 18-50 years old) was conducted. Participants received B. subtilis R0179 at 0.1, 1.0 or 10×109 cfu/capsule/day or placebo for four weeks. General wellness was assessed using a daily questionnaire evaluating GI, cephalic, ear-nose-throat, behavioural, emetic, and epidermal symptoms. GI symptoms were further evaluated using a weekly gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS). GI transit viability of B. subtilis R0179 was assessed by plating and microbiota analysis by 16S rRNA at baseline, week 4 of the intervention and washout. General wellness and GI function were not affected by oral consumption of B. subtilis R0179 at any dose. Daily questionnaire syndrome scores were not different from baseline and did not exceed a clinically significant score of 1. GSRS syndrome scores were not different from baseline and ranged from 1.1±0.1 to 1.9±0.2. Faecal viable counts of B. subtilis R0179 demonstrated a dose response: the placebo group (1.1±0.1 log10 cfu/g) differed from 0.1×109 (4.6±0.1 log10 cfu/g), 1×109 (5.6±0.1 log10 cfu/g) and 10×109 (6.4±0.1 log10 cfu/g) (P<0.0001). No significant changes in phyla were observed, but sequence reads binned to multiple operational taxonomic units matching closest to Ruminococci increased during probiotic supplementation. B. subtilis R0179 survives passage through the human GI tract and is well tolerated by healthy adults at intakes from 0.1 to 10×109 cfu/day. The trial has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov under NCT01802151.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GSRS; gastrointestinal symptoms; microbiota; probiotic; viability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25062611     DOI: 10.3920/BM2014.0031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Benef Microbes        ISSN: 1876-2883            Impact factor:   4.205


  13 in total

1.  Preclinical Safety Assessment of Bacillus subtilis BS50 for Probiotic and Food Applications.

Authors:  Laura M Brutscher; Claudia Borgmeier; Sean M Garvey; Jessica L Spears
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-17

2.  The effect of probiotic supplementation on performance, inflammatory markers and gastro-intestinal symptoms in elite road cyclists.

Authors:  Chen Schreiber; Snait Tamir; Ron Golan; Ayelet Weinstein; Yitzhak Weinstein
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 3.  Alterations in fecal microbiota composition by probiotic supplementation in healthy adults: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Nadja B Kristensen; Thomas Bryrup; Kristine H Allin; Trine Nielsen; Tue H Hansen; Oluf Pedersen
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 11.117

4.  Effect of oral administration of Bacillus coagulans B37 and Bacillus pumilus B9 strains on fecal coliforms, Lactobacillus and Bacillus spp. in rat animal model.

Authors:  Lopamudra Haldar; D N Gandhi
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-07-26

5.  Lactobacillus johnsonii N6.2 Modulates the Host Immune Responses: A Double-Blind, Randomized Trial in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Guillermo E Marcial; Amanda L Ford; Michael J Haller; Salvador A Gezan; Natalie A Harrison; Dan Cai; Julie L Meyer; Daniel J Perry; Mark A Atkinson; Clive H Wasserfall; Timothy Garrett; Claudio F Gonzalez; Todd M Brusko; Wendy J Dahl; Graciela L Lorca
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Bacillus subtilis biofilm extends Caenorhabditis elegans longevity through downregulation of the insulin-like signalling pathway.

Authors:  Verónica Donato; Facundo Rodríguez Ayala; Sebastián Cogliati; Carlos Bauman; Juan Gabriel Costa; Cecilia Leñini; Roberto Grau
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Adults with Prader-Willi syndrome exhibit a unique microbiota profile.

Authors:  Wendy J Dahl; Jérémie Auger; Zainab Alyousif; Jennifer L Miller; Thomas A Tompkins
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2021-02-06

8.  Examining the Gastrointestinal and Immunomodulatory Effects of the Novel Probiotic Bacillus subtilis DE111.

Authors:  Kimberley E Freedman; Jessica L Hill; Yuren Wei; Allegra R Vazquez; Diana S Grubb; Roxanne E Trotter; Scott D Wrigley; Sarah A Johnson; Michelle T Foster; Tiffany L Weir
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Safety Assessment of Bacillus subtilis MB40 for Use in Foods and Dietary Supplements.

Authors:  Jessica L Spears; Richard Kramer; Andrey I Nikiforov; Marisa O Rihner; Elizabeth A Lambert
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Lyophilized B. subtilis ZB183 Spores: 90-Day Repeat Dose Oral (Gavage) Toxicity Study in Wistar Rats.

Authors:  B Appala Naidu; Kamala Kannan; D P Santhosh Kumar; John W K Oliver; Zachary D Abbott
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.