IMPORTANCE: Estrogen receptor α (ESR1) mutations found in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) promote ligand-independent receptor activation and resistance to estrogen-deprivation therapy in laboratory models. The prevalence of these mutations and their potential impact on clinical outcomes has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of ESR1 mutations (Y537S and D538G) in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive MBC and determine whether mutation is associated with inferior outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From December 16, 2014, to August 26, 2015, we analyzed cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from baseline plasma samples from participants in the BOLERO-2 double-blind phase 3 study that randomized patients from 189 centers in 24 countries with MBC to exemestane plus placebo or exemestane plus everolimus. The study enrolled postmenopausal women with a diagnosis of MBC and prior exposure to an aromatase inhibitor. Baseline plasma samples were available from 541 of 724 patients (74.7%). We assessed the effect of mutation on overall survival of the population and the effect of mutation on progression-free survival (PFS) by treatment arm. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to treatment with exemestane (25 mg oral daily) together with everolimus (10 mg oral daily) or with placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The 2 most frequent mutations in ESR1 (Y537S and D538G) were analyzed from cfDNA using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and samples scored as wild-type, D538G, Y537S, or double mutant. Cox-proportional hazards model was used to assess PFS in patient subgroups defined by mutations, and the effect of each mutation on overall survival. RESULTS: Of 541 evaluable patients, 156 (28.8%) had ESR1 mutation D538G (21.1%) and/or Y537S (13.3%), and 30 had both. These mutations were associated with shorter overall survival (wild-type, 32.1 months [95% CI, 28.09-36.40 months]; D538G, 25.99 months [95% CI, 19.19-32.36 months]; Y537S, 19.98 months [13.01-29.31 months]; both mutations, 15.15 months [95% CI, 10.87-27.43 months]). The D538G group (hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.02-0.57]) derived a similar PFS benefit as wild type from addition of everolimus to exemestane. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: ESR1 mutations are prevalent in ER-positive aromatase inhibitor-treated MBC. Both Y537S and D538G mutations are associated with more aggressive disease biology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00863655.
IMPORTANCE: Estrogen receptor α (ESR1) mutations found in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) promote ligand-independent receptor activation and resistance to estrogen-deprivation therapy in laboratory models. The prevalence of these mutations and their potential impact on clinical outcomes has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of ESR1 mutations (Y537S and D538G) in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive MBC and determine whether mutation is associated with inferior outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From December 16, 2014, to August 26, 2015, we analyzed cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from baseline plasma samples from participants in the BOLERO-2 double-blind phase 3 study that randomized patients from 189 centers in 24 countries with MBC to exemestane plus placebo or exemestane plus everolimus. The study enrolled postmenopausal women with a diagnosis of MBC and prior exposure to an aromatase inhibitor. Baseline plasma samples were available from 541 of 724 patients (74.7%). We assessed the effect of mutation on overall survival of the population and the effect of mutation on progression-free survival (PFS) by treatment arm. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to treatment with exemestane (25 mg oral daily) together with everolimus (10 mg oral daily) or with placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The 2 most frequent mutations in ESR1 (Y537S and D538G) were analyzed from cfDNA using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and samples scored as wild-type, D538G, Y537S, or double mutant. Cox-proportional hazards model was used to assess PFS in patient subgroups defined by mutations, and the effect of each mutation on overall survival. RESULTS: Of 541 evaluable patients, 156 (28.8%) had ESR1 mutation D538G (21.1%) and/or Y537S (13.3%), and 30 had both. These mutations were associated with shorter overall survival (wild-type, 32.1 months [95% CI, 28.09-36.40 months]; D538G, 25.99 months [95% CI, 19.19-32.36 months]; Y537S, 19.98 months [13.01-29.31 months]; both mutations, 15.15 months [95% CI, 10.87-27.43 months]). The D538G group (hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.02-0.57]) derived a similar PFS benefit as wild type from addition of everolimus to exemestane. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: ESR1 mutations are prevalent in ER-positive aromatase inhibitor-treated MBC. Both Y537S and D538G mutations are associated with more aggressive disease biology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00863655.
Authors: José Baselga; Mario Campone; Martine Piccart; Howard A Burris; Hope S Rugo; Tarek Sahmoud; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Michael Gnant; Kathleen I Pritchard; Fabienne Lebrun; J Thaddeus Beck; Yoshinori Ito; Denise Yardley; Ines Deleu; Alejandra Perez; Thomas Bachelot; Luc Vittori; Zhiying Xu; Pabak Mukhopadhyay; David Lebwohl; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Piccart; G N Hortobagyi; M Campone; K I Pritchard; F Lebrun; Y Ito; S Noguchi; A Perez; H S Rugo; I Deleu; H A Burris; L Provencher; P Neven; M Gnant; M Shtivelband; C Wu; J Fan; W Feng; T Taran; J Baselga Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Lyndsay Harris; Herbert Fritsche; Robert Mennel; Larry Norton; Peter Ravdin; Sheila Taube; Mark R Somerfield; Daniel F Hayes; Robert C Bast Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Geoffrey R Oxnard; Cloud P Paweletz; Yanan Kuang; Stacy L Mach; Allison O'Connell; Melissa M Messineo; Jason J Luke; Mohit Butaney; Paul Kirschmeier; David M Jackman; Pasi A Jänne Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Gaia Schiavon; Sarah Hrebien; Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Rosalind J Cutts; Alex Pearson; Noelia Tarazona; Kerry Fenwick; Iwanka Kozarewa; Elena Lopez-Knowles; Ricardo Ribas; Ashutosh Nerurkar; Peter Osin; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Lesley-Ann Martin; Mitch Dowsett; Ian E Smith; Nicholas C Turner Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Peilu Wang; Amir Bahreini; Rekha Gyanchandani; Peter C Lucas; Ryan J Hartmaier; Rebecca J Watters; Amruth R Jonnalagadda; Humberto E Trejo Bittar; Aaron Berg; Ronald L Hamilton; Brenda F Kurland; Kurt R Weiss; Aju Mathew; Jose Pablo Leone; Nancy E Davidson; Marina N Nikiforova; Adam M Brufsky; Tadeu F Ambros; Andrew M Stern; Shannon L Puhalla; Adrian V Lee; Steffi Oesterreich Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David S Guttery; Karen Page; Allison Hills; Laura Woodley; Stephanie D Marchese; Basma Rghebi; Robert K Hastings; Jinli Luo; J Howard Pringle; Justin Stebbing; R Charles Coombes; Simak Ali; Jacqueline A Shaw Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Timothy M Butler; Katherine Johnson-Camacho; Myron Peto; Nicholas J Wang; Tara A Macey; James E Korkola; Theresa M Koppie; Christopher L Corless; Joe W Gray; Paul T Spellman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Weiyi Toy; Yang Shen; Helen Won; Bradley Green; Rita A Sakr; Marie Will; Zhiqiang Li; Kinisha Gala; Sean Fanning; Tari A King; Clifford Hudis; David Chen; Tetiana Taran; Gabriel Hortobagyi; Geoffrey Greene; Michael Berger; José Baselga; Sarat Chandarlapaty Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2013-11-03 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Shanhang Jia; Mark T Miedel; Marilyn Ngo; Ryan Hessenius; Ning Chen; Peilu Wang; Amir Bahreini; Zheqi Li; Zhijie Ding; Tong Ying Shun; Daniel M Zuckerman; D Lansing Taylor; Shannon L Puhalla; Adrian V Lee; Steffi Oesterreich; Andrew M Stern Journal: Oncology Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Lorenzo Gerratana; Andrew A Davis; Ami N Shah; Chenyu Lin; Carla Corvaja; Massimo Cristofanilli Journal: Curr Treat Options Oncol Date: 2019-06-29
Authors: Rinath Jeselsohn; Johann S Bergholz; Matthew Pun; MacIntosh Cornwell; Weihan Liu; Agostina Nardone; Tengfei Xiao; Wei Li; Xintao Qiu; Gilles Buchwalter; Ariel Feiglin; Kayley Abell-Hart; Teng Fei; Prakash Rao; Henry Long; Nicholas Kwiatkowski; Tinghu Zhang; Nathanael Gray; Diane Melchers; Rene Houtman; X Shirley Liu; Ofir Cohen; Nikhil Wagle; Eric P Winer; Jean Zhao; Myles Brown Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2018-02-12 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Aleix Prat; Jan Christoph Brase; Yuan Cheng; Paolo Nuciforo; Laia Paré; Tomás Pascual; Débora Martínez; Patricia Galván; Maria Vidal; Barbara Adamo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; José Baselga; Eva Ciruelos Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-01-24
Authors: Yuechao Zhao; Mary J Laws; Valeria Sanabria Guillen; Yvonne Ziegler; Jian Min; Abhishek Sharma; Sung Hoon Kim; David Chu; Ben Ho Park; Steffi Oesterreich; Chengjian Mao; David J Shapiro; Kendall W Nettles; John A Katzenellenbogen; Benita S Katzenellenbogen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 12.701