OBJECTIVE: Twenty to fifty percent of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancers express mutations within the ER ligand-binding domain. While most studies focused on the constitutive ER signaling activity commonly engendered by these mutations selected during estrogen deprivation therapy, our study was aimed at investigating distinctive phenotypes conferred by different mutations within this class. METHODS: We examined the two most prevalent mutations, D538G and Y537S, employing corroborative genome-edited and lentiviral-transduced ER+ T47D cell models. We used a luciferase-based reporter and endogenous phospho-ER immunoblot analysis to characterize the estrogen response of ER mutants and determined their resistance to known ER antagonists. RESULTS: Consistent with their selection during estrogen deprivation therapy, these mutants conferred constitutive ER activity. While Y537S mutants showed no estrogen dependence, D538G mutants demonstrated an enhanced estrogen-dependent response. Both mutations conferred resistance to ER antagonists that was overcome at higher doses acting specifically through their ER target. CONCLUSIONS: These observations provide a tenable hypothesis for how D538G ESR1-expressing clones can contribute to shorter progression-free survival observed in the exemestane arm of the BOLERO-2 study. Thus, in those patients with dominant D538G-expressing clones, longitudinal analysis for this mutation in circulating free DNA may prove beneficial for informing more optimal therapeutic regimens.
OBJECTIVE: Twenty to fifty percent of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancers express mutations within the ER ligand-binding domain. While most studies focused on the constitutive ER signaling activity commonly engendered by these mutations selected during estrogen deprivation therapy, our study was aimed at investigating distinctive phenotypes conferred by different mutations within this class. METHODS: We examined the two most prevalent mutations, D538G and Y537S, employing corroborative genome-edited and lentiviral-transduced ER+ T47D cell models. We used a luciferase-based reporter and endogenous phospho-ER immunoblot analysis to characterize the estrogen response of ER mutants and determined their resistance to known ER antagonists. RESULTS: Consistent with their selection during estrogen deprivation therapy, these mutants conferred constitutive ER activity. While Y537S mutants showed no estrogen dependence, D538G mutants demonstrated an enhanced estrogen-dependent response. Both mutations conferred resistance to ER antagonists that was overcome at higher doses acting specifically through their ER target. CONCLUSIONS: These observations provide a tenable hypothesis for how D538GESR1-expressing clones can contribute to shorter progression-free survival observed in the exemestane arm of the BOLERO-2 study. Thus, in those patients with dominant D538G-expressing clones, longitudinal analysis for this mutation in circulating free DNA may prove beneficial for informing more optimal therapeutic regimens.
Authors: Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Gaia Schiavon; Britta Weigelt; Charlotte Ng; Sarah Hrebien; Rosalind J Cutts; Maggie Cheang; Peter Osin; Ashutosh Nerurkar; Iwanka Kozarewa; Javier Armisen Garrido; Mitch Dowsett; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Ian E Smith; Nicholas C Turner Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: J Legler; C E van den Brink; A Brouwer; A J Murk; P T van der Saag; A D Vethaak; B van der Burg Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Ping Fan; Philipp Y Maximov; Ramona F Curpan; Balkees Abderrahman; V Craig Jordan Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 4.102
Authors: Amanda M Clark; Sarah E Wheeler; Donald P Taylor; Venkateswaran C Pillai; Carissa L Young; Rachelle Prantil-Baun; Transon Nguyen; Donna B Stolz; Jeffrey T Borenstein; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Raman Venkataramanan; Linda G Griffith; Alan Wells Journal: Exp Biol Med (Maywood) Date: 2014-05-12
Authors: Peilu Wang; Amir Bahreini; Rekha Gyanchandani; Peter C Lucas; Ryan J Hartmaier; Rebecca J Watters; Amruth R Jonnalagadda; Humberto E Trejo Bittar; Aaron Berg; Ronald L Hamilton; Brenda F Kurland; Kurt R Weiss; Aju Mathew; Jose Pablo Leone; Nancy E Davidson; Marina N Nikiforova; Adam M Brufsky; Tadeu F Ambros; Andrew M Stern; Shannon L Puhalla; Adrian V Lee; Steffi Oesterreich Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: S Kato; H Endoh; Y Masuhiro; T Kitamoto; S Uchiyama; H Sasaki; S Masushige; Y Gotoh; E Nishida; H Kawashima; D Metzger; P Chambon Journal: Science Date: 1995-12-01 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jill M Spoerke; Steven Gendreau; Kimberly Walter; Jiaheng Qiu; Timothy R Wilson; Heidi Savage; Junko Aimi; Mika K Derynck; Meng Chen; Iris T Chan; Lukas C Amler; Garret M Hampton; Stephen Johnston; Ian Krop; Peter Schmid; Mark R Lackner Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Weiyi Toy; Yang Shen; Helen Won; Bradley Green; Rita A Sakr; Marie Will; Zhiqiang Li; Kinisha Gala; Sean Fanning; Tari A King; Clifford Hudis; David Chen; Tetiana Taran; Gabriel Hortobagyi; Geoffrey Greene; Michael Berger; José Baselga; Sarat Chandarlapaty Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2013-11-03 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: José Manuel Calderón-Montaño; Estefanía Burgos-Morón; Manuel Luis Orta; Dolores Maldonado-Navas; Irene García-Domínguez; Miguel López-Lázaro Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Zheqi Li; Yang Wu; Megan E Yates; Nilgun Tasdemir; Amir Bahreini; Jian Chen; Kevin M Levine; Nolan M Priedigkeit; Azadeh Nasrazadani; Simak Ali; Laki Buluwela; Spencer Arnesen; Jason Gertz; Jennifer K Richer; Benjamin Troness; Dorraya El-Ashry; Qiang Zhang; Lorenzo Gerratana; Youbin Zhang; Massimo Cristofanilli; Maritza A Montanez; Prithu Sundd; Callen T Wallace; Simon C Watkins; Caterina Fumagalli; Elena Guerini-Rocco; Li Zhu; George C Tseng; Nikhil Wagle; Jason S Carroll; Paul Jank; Carsten Denkert; Maria M Karsten; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Ben H Park; Peter C Lucas; Jennifer M Atkinson; Adrian V Lee; Steffi Oesterreich Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Suet Kee Loo; Megan E Yates; Sichun Yang; Steffi Oesterreich; Adrian V Lee; Xiao-Song Wang Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Albert Gough; Alejandro Soto-Gutierrez; Lawrence Vernetti; Mo R Ebrahimkhani; Andrew M Stern; D Lansing Taylor Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 73.082
Authors: Mark T Miedel; Dillon C Gavlock; Shanhang Jia; Albert Gough; D Lansing Taylor; Andrew M Stern Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Sarah A Jeffreys; Branka Powter; Bavanthi Balakrishnar; Kelly Mok; Patsy Soon; André Franken; Hans Neubauer; Paul de Souza; Therese M Becker Journal: Cells Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 6.600