Literature DB >> 25231953

Everolimus plus exemestane for hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer: overall survival results from BOLERO-2†.

M Piccart1, G N Hortobagyi2, M Campone3, K I Pritchard4, F Lebrun5, Y Ito6, S Noguchi7, A Perez8, H S Rugo9, I Deleu10, H A Burris11, L Provencher12, P Neven13, M Gnant14, M Shtivelband15, C Wu16, J Fan16, W Feng16, T Taran16, J Baselga17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The BOLERO-2 study previously demonstrated that adding everolimus (EVE) to exemestane (EXE) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) by more than twofold in patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR(+)), HER2-negative advanced breast cancer that recurred or progressed during/after treatment with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs). The overall survival (OS) analysis is presented here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BOLERO-2 is a phase III, double-blind, randomized international trial comparing EVE 10 mg/day plus EXE 25 mg/day versus placebo (PBO) + EXE 25 mg/day in postmenopausal women with HR(+) advanced breast cancer with prior exposure to NSAIs. The primary end point was PFS by local investigator assessment; OS was a key secondary end point.
RESULTS: At the time of data cutoff (3 October 2013), 410 deaths had occurred and 13 patients remained on treatment. Median OS in patients receiving EVE + EXE was 31.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 28.0-34.6 months] compared with 26.6 months (95% CI 22.6-33.1 months) in patients receiving PBO + EXE (hazard ratio = 0.89; 95% CI 0.73-1.10; log-rank P = 0.14). Poststudy treatments were received by 84% of patients in the EVE + EXE arm versus 90% of patients in the PBO + EXE arm. Types of poststudy therapies were balanced across arms, except for chemotherapy (53% EVE + EXE versus 63% PBO + EXE). No new safety concerns were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: In BOLERO-2, adding EVE to EXE did not confer a statistically significant improvement in the secondary end point OS despite producing a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in the primary end point, PFS (4.6-months prolongation in median PFS; P < 0.0001). Ongoing translational research should further refine the benefit of mTOR inhibition and related pathways in this treatment setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00863655.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  everolimus; exemestane; hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer; overall survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25231953      PMCID: PMC6267855          DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  36 in total

Review 1.  Biological mechanisms and clinical implications of endocrine resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Mario Giuliano; Rachel Schifp; C Kent Osborne; Meghana V Trivedi
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  1st International consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 1).

Authors:  F Cardoso; A Costa; L Norton; D Cameron; T Cufer; L Fallowfield; P Francis; J Gligorov; S Kyriakides; N Lin; O Pagani; E Senkus; C Thomssen; M Aapro; J Bergh; A Di Leo; N El Saghir; P A Ganz; K Gelmon; A Goldhirsch; N Harbeck; N Houssami; C Hudis; B Kaufman; M Leadbeater; M Mayer; A Rodger; H Rugo; V Sacchini; G Sledge; L van't Veer; G Viale; I Krop; E Winer
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Ganitumab with either exemestane or fulvestrant for postmenopausal women with advanced, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  John Fr Robertson; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Hugues Bourgeois; Hagen Kennecke; Richard H de Boer; William Jacot; Jesse McGreivy; Samuel Suzuki; Min Zhu; Ian McCaffery; Elwyn Loh; Jennifer L Gansert; Peter A Kaufman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Rapamycin induces feedback activation of Akt signaling through an IGF-1R-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  X Wan; B Harkavy; N Shen; P Grohar; L J Helman
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Phase II randomized study of neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole compared with placebo plus letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  José Baselga; Vladimir Semiglazov; Peter van Dam; Alexey Manikhas; Meritxell Bellet; José Mayordomo; Mario Campone; Ernst Kubista; Richard Greil; Giulia Bianchi; Jutta Steinseifer; Betty Molloy; Erika Tokaji; Humphrey Gardner; Penny Phillips; Michael Stumm; Heidi A Lane; J Michael Dixon; Walter Jonat; Hope S Rugo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Randomized phase II trial of everolimus in combination with tamoxifen in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer with prior exposure to aromatase inhibitors: a GINECO study.

Authors:  Thomas Bachelot; Céline Bourgier; Claire Cropet; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Gilles Freyer; Sophie Abadie-Lacourtoisie; Jean-Christophe Eymard; Marc Debled; Dominique Spaëth; Eric Legouffe; Djelila Allouache; Claude El Kouri; Eric Pujade-Lauraine
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Final overall survival: fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in the randomized CONFIRM trial.

Authors:  Angelo Di Leo; Guy Jerusalem; Lubos Petruzelka; Roberto Torres; Igor N Bondarenko; Rustem Khasanov; Didier Verhoeven; José L Pedrini; Iya Smirnova; Mikhail R Lichinitser; Kelly Pendergrass; Luca Malorni; Sally Garnett; Yuri Rukazenkov; Miguel Martin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Incidence and time course of everolimus-related adverse events in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: insights from BOLERO-2.

Authors:  H S Rugo; K I Pritchard; M Gnant; S Noguchi; M Piccart; G Hortobagyi; J Baselga; A Perez; M Geberth; T Csoszi; E Chouinard; V Srimuninnimit; P Puttawibul; J Eakle; W Feng; H Bauly; M El-Hashimy; T Taran; H A Burris
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Activating ESR1 mutations in hormone-resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Dan R Robinson; Yi-Mi Wu; Pankaj Vats; Fengyun Su; Robert J Lonigro; Xuhong Cao; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Rui Wang; Yu Ning; Lynda Hodges; Amy Gursky; Javed Siddiqui; Scott A Tomlins; Sameek Roychowdhury; Kenneth J Pienta; Scott Y Kim; J Scott Roberts; James M Rae; Catherine H Van Poznak; Daniel F Hayes; Rashmi Chugh; Lakshmi P Kunju; Moshe Talpaz; Anne F Schott; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-11-03       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 10.  Mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer: focus on signaling pathways, miRNAs and genetically based resistance.

Authors:  Rocío García-Becerra; Nancy Santos; Lorenza Díaz; Javier Camacho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  175 in total

Review 1.  Metastatic breast cancer: The Odyssey of personalization.

Authors:  A Sonnenblick; N Pondé; M Piccart
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  Management of locally advanced breast cancer-perspectives and future directions.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Elzbieta Senkus; Maria J Cardoso; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Established Concepts and Emerging Strategies.

Authors:  Tessa G Steenbruggen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Carolien H Smorenburg; Gabe S Sonke
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Cost-Effectiveness of Second-Line Endocrine Therapies in Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-positive and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Verin Lertjanyakun; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Susumu Kunisawa; Yuichi Imanaka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Mechanisms of aromatase inhibitor resistance.

Authors:  Cynthia X Ma; Tomás Reinert; Izabela Chmielewska; Matthew J Ellis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  The Growing Role of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Treating Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ami N Shah; Massimo Cristofanilli
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-01

Review 7.  The therapeutic potential of mTOR inhibitors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Linda S Steelman; Alberto M Martelli; Lucio Cocco; Massimo Libra; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Stephen L Abrams; James A McCubrey
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Optimizing the use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.

Authors:  Laila S Agrawal; Ingrid A Mayer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Systemic treatment approaches in her2-negative advanced breast cancer-guidance on the guidelines.

Authors:  A A Joy; M Ghosh; R Fernandes; M J Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)†.

Authors:  F Cardoso; E Senkus; A Costa; E Papadopoulos; M Aapro; F André; N Harbeck; B Aguilar Lopez; C H Barrios; J Bergh; L Biganzoli; C B Boers-Doets; M J Cardoso; L A Carey; J Cortés; G Curigliano; V Diéras; N S El Saghir; A Eniu; L Fallowfield; P A Francis; K Gelmon; S R D Johnston; B Kaufman; S Koppikar; I E Krop; M Mayer; G Nakigudde; B V Offersen; S Ohno; O Pagani; S Paluch-Shimon; F Penault-Llorca; A Prat; H S Rugo; G W Sledge; D Spence; C Thomssen; D A Vorobiof; B Xu; L Norton; E P Winer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.