Literature DB >> 497335

Inferences about linkage disequilibrium.

B S Weir.   

Abstract

Existing theory for inferences about linkage disequilibrium is restricted to a measure defined on gametic frequencies. Unless gametic frequencies are directly observable, they are inferred from genotypic frequencies under the assumption of random union of gametes. Primary emphasis in this paper is given to genotypic data, and disequilibrium coefficients are defined for all subsets of two or more of the four genes, two at each of two loci, carried by an individual. Linkage disequilibrium coefficients are defined for genes within and between gametes, and methods of estimating and testing these coefficients are given for gametic data. For genotypic data, when coupling and repulsion double heterozygotes cannot be distinguished. Burrows' composite measure of linkage disequilibrium is discussed. In particular, the estimate for this measure and hypothesis tests based on it are compared to the usual maximum likelihood estimate of gametic linkage disequilibrium, and corresponding likelihood ratio or contingency chi-square tests. General use of the composite measure, whether or not random union of gametes is an appropriate assumption, is recommended. Attention is given to small samples, where the non-normality of gene frequencies will have greatest effect on methods of inference based on normal theory. Even tools such as Fisher's z-transformation for the correlation of gene frequencies are found to perform quite satisfactorily.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 497335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  115 in total

1.  Measuring gametic disequilibrium from multilocus data.

Authors:  K L Ayres; D J Balding
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Spectrum of nonrandom associations between microsatellite loci on human chromosome 11p15.

Authors:  C Zapata; S Rodríguez; G Visedo; F Sacristán
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Modeling linkage disequilibrium between a polymorphic marker locus and a locus affecting complex dichotomous traits in natural populations.

Authors:  Z W Luo; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Widespread genomic divergence during sympatric speciation.

Authors:  Andrew P Michel; Sheina Sim; Thomas H Q Powell; Michael S Taylor; Patrik Nosil; Jeffrey L Feder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Testing for linkage disequilibrium in the New Zealand radiata pine breeding population.

Authors:  S Kumar; C Echt; P L Wilcox; T E Richardson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Independence of VNTR alleles defined as fixed bins.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Independence of VNTR alleles defined as floating bins.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Linkage disequilibrium testing when linkage phase is unknown.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The effect of genotyping errors on the robustness of composite linkage disequilibrium measures.

Authors:  Yu Mei Li; Yang Xiang
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.166

10.  Testing for association between disease and linked marker loci: a log-linear-model analysis.

Authors:  L Tiret; P Amouyel; R Rakotovao; F Cambien; P Ducimetière
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.