Literature DB >> 17584385

Effective population sizes and migration rates in fragmented populations of an endangered insect (Coenagrion mercuriale: Odonata).

Phillip C Watts1, Ilik J Saccheri, Stephen J Kemp, David J Thompson.   

Abstract

1. Effective population sizes (N(e)) and migration rates (m) are critical evolutionary parameters that impact on population survival and determine the relative influence of selection and genetic drift. While the parameter m is well-studied in animal populations, N(e) remains challenging to measure and consequently is only rarely estimated, particularly in insect taxa. 2. We used demographic and genetic methods to estimate N(e) and m in a fragmented population of the endangered damselfly Coenagrion mercuriale to better understand the contrast between genetic and field estimates of these parameters and also to identify the spatial scale over which populations may become locally adapted. 3. We found a contrast between demographic- and genetic-based estimates of these parameters, with the former apparently providing overestimates of N(e), owing to substantial underestimation of the variance in reproductive success, and the latter overestimating m, because spatial genetic structure is weak. 4. The overall N(e) of sites within the population network at Beaulieu Heath, the largest C. mercuriale site in the UK, was estimated to vary between approximately 60 and 2700. 5. While N(e) was not correlated with either the total numbers of adults (N) or the area of habitat, this parameter was always less than N, because of substantial variance in reproductive success. The ratio N(e)/N varied between 0.006 and 0.42 and was generally larger in smaller populations, possibly representing some 'genetic compensation'. 6. From a simple genetic model and these data on N(e) and m, it seems that populations of C. mercuriale have the potential to respond to localized spatial variation in selection and this would need to be considered for future genetic management of this endangered species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17584385     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01249.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  7 in total

1.  Making sense of the relationships between Ne, Nb and Nc towards defining conservation thresholds in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

Authors:  A-L Ferchaud; C Perrier; J April; C Hernandez; M Dionne; L Bernatchez
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Developmental plasticity as a cohesive evolutionary process between sympatric alternate-year insect cohorts.

Authors:  P C Watts; D J Thompson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Age structure, changing demography and effective population size in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

Authors:  Friso P Palstra; Michael F O'Connell; Daniel E Ruzzante
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size in an endangered butterfly indicate a possible role for genetic compensation.

Authors:  Emily V Saarinen; James D Austin; Jaret C Daniels
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Conservation genetics of a threatened butterfly: comparison of allozymes, RAPDs and microsatellites.

Authors:  Camille Turlure; Sofie Vandewoestijne; Michel Baguette
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Effective/census population size ratio estimation: a compendium and appraisal.

Authors:  Friso P Palstra; Dylan J Fraser
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Microsatellite development and first population size estimates for the groundwater isopod Proasellus walteri.

Authors:  Cécile Capderrey; Bernard Kaufmann; Pauline Jean; Florian Malard; Lara Konecny-Dupré; Tristan Lefébure; Christophe J Douady
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.