| Literature DB >> 27528216 |
Astrid Apor1, Anikó Ilona Nagy2, Attila Kovács1, Aristomenis Manouras3, Péter Andrássy4, Béla Merkely1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography has increased our understanding of the distinct pathomechanisms underlying functional, ischaemic or degenerative mitral regurgitation. However, potential differences in dynamic morphology between the subtypes of degenerative mitral prolapse have scarcely been investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Annuloplasty ring; Mitral valve dynamics; Myxomatous; Real-time three dimensional transesophageal echocardiography
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27528216 PMCID: PMC4986382 DOI: 10.1186/s12947-016-0073-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Fig. 1Static 3D model of the mitral valve in Barlow disease (a) and FED (b) produced by the Qlab software. Multiplanar reconstruction of the 3D data set, in the right lower corner color-coded, surface rendered model of the valve. Prolapsing scallops are color coded in red
Patient characteristics
| Barlow ( | FED ( | Control ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 51 ± 14a | 62 ± 12 | 57 ± 16 |
| Woman (n, %) | 10 (37 %) | 13 (41 %) | 7 (39 %) |
| BSA (m2) | 1.90 ± 0.19 | 1.95 ± 0.23 | 1.87 ± 0.24 |
| Hypertension | 13 (48 %)a | 26 (82 %)b | 10 (57 %) |
| Diabetes | 3 (11 %)b | 3 (9 %)b | 0 |
| EF (%) | 66.2 ± 5.8 | 67.1 ± 6.1 | 65.4 ± 5.3 |
| LV EDV (ml) | 133.1 ± 49.9 | 128.2 ± 40.8 | 105.5 ± 29.4 |
| LV ESV (ml) | 44 ± 18.4 | 43.9 ± 12.7 | 37.5 ± 16.5 |
| LAVi (ml/m2) | 52.7 ± 13.7b | 57.7 ± 29.5b | 36.9 ± 8.6 |
| PAPs (mm Hg) | 38 ± 8a,b | 47 ± 16b | 29 ± 5 |
| MR (n, %) | |||
| None | 0b | 0b | 6 (33 %) |
| Mild | 0b | 0b | 11 (61 %) |
| Moderate | 11 (41 %)a,b | 2 (6 %) | 1 (6 %) |
| Severe | 16 (59 %)a,b | 30 (94 %)b | 0 |
| Flail | 10 (37)a,b | 26 (81 %)b | 0 |
| Cleft | 6 (22 %)a,b | 12 (38 %)b | 0 |
BSA indicates body surface area, EF ejection fraction, LV EDV left ventricular end diastolic volume, LV ESV left ventricular end systolic volume, LAVi left atrial volume indexed to BSA, PAPs systolic pulmonary artery pressure, MR mitral regurgitation
aindicates significant difference between the Barlow and FED groups
bindicates significant difference compared to control
Static annular and valvular geometric parameters
| Barlow ( | FED ( | Control ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annular parameters | |||
| Antero-posterior diameter (mm) | 37.3 ± 6a,b | 34.4 ± 3.4b | 30.9 ± 3.5 |
| Transverse diameter (mm) | 46.6 ± 5.0a,b | 43 ± 4.1b | 37.7 ± 4.0 |
| 3D mitral annular area (cm2) | 15 ± 2.8a,b | 13.3 ± 2.4b | 10.6 ± 2.3 |
| Ellipticity index (%) | 126 ± 13 | 125 ± 10 | 117 ± 29 |
| Non-planar angle of leaflets (°) | 151.6 ± 16.4a,b | 151.7 ± 12.7b | 147.2 ± 12.4 |
| Annular height (mm) | 4.2 ± 1.5 | 3.7 ± 1.4 | 4.0 ± 1.0 |
| AHCWR | 13.1 ± 4.1b | 13.9 ± 5.6 | 15.7 ± 3.7 |
| Valvular parameters | |||
| 3D total leaflet area (cm2) | 18.5 ± 4.9a,b | 14.3 ± 2.9b | 11.3 ± 2.7 |
| Prolapse height (mm) | 7.5 ± 2.8a,b | 5.8 ± 2.6b | 0.8 ± 0.6 |
| Prolapse volume (ml) | 3.8 ± 2.9a,b | 1.2 ± 1.3b | 0.0 ± 0.1 |
Data are based on measurements on an end-systolic frame. Values are presented as mean ± SD
aindicates significant difference between the Barlow and FED groups
bindicates significant difference compared to control
Fig. 2Dynamic behavior of the mitral annulus in systole. AP diameter, transverse diameter and 3D area changes of the mitral annulus are displayed over time. Continuous parameters are normalized for their end systolic value. Bold lines indicate mean values, dotted lines indicate SD
Fig. 3Dynamic model of the mitral valve in Barlow disease (a) and FED (b) produced by the TomTec software. The graph represents the 3D annular area over time