Literature DB >> 24612703

In-vivo analysis of selectively flexible mitral annuloplasty rings using three-dimensional echocardiography.

Khurram Owais1, Han Kim2, Kamal R Khabbaz3, Remco Bergman4, Robina Matyal1, Robert C Gorman5, Joseph H Gorman5, Philip E Hess1, Feroze Mahmood1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Selectively flexible rings, Colvin-Galloway (CG) Future and Carpentier-Edwards (CE) Physio II, are used for annuloplasty during mitral valve repair to facilitate dynamic annular motion while preventing annular dilation. In this study, we assessed the extent and nature of the flexibility of these rings in vivo, which has not been objectively demonstrated.
METHODS: Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography was used intraoperatively to acquire data regarding dynamic motion of mitral annuli and annuloplasty rings in 33 patients undergoing mitral repair (15 CG Future and 18 CE Physio II) and in 15 control patients. Data were analyzed to assess the dynamic changes in annular geometry after implantation of selectively flexible rings.
RESULTS: After annuloplasty, there was an immediate and significant decrease in annular displacement (p < 0.001) and annular displacement velocity (p < 0.01). Dynamic change in multiple variables including anteroposterior diameter (p < 0.001) and annular area (p < 0.001) was also significantly depressed. In comparison with normal mitral valves, partially flexible rings allowed limited dynamic motion: percentage changes in anteroposterior diameter (p < 0.001), anterolateral posteromedial diameter (p < 0.001), and total circumference (p < 0.001) were significantly lower. Compared with each other, the two rings resulted in similar changes in anterior annulus length (p = 0.93), posterior annular length (p = 0.82), and annular area (p = 0.31).
CONCLUSIONS: Mitral annular dynamics were uniformly depressed after implantation of these rings. Selective flexibility could not be demonstrated in vivo using echocardiographic data.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24612703      PMCID: PMC6563339          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  22 in total

Review 1.  Evolving concepts and technologies in mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Paul W M Fedak; Patrick M McCarthy; Robert O Bonow
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Flexible versus nonflexible mitral valve rings for congestive heart failure: differential durability of repair.

Authors:  Martinus T Spoor; Amy Geltz; Steven F Bolling
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  The role of annuloplasty in mitral valve repair.

Authors:  C F Schwartz; I Gulkarov; K Bohmann; S B Colvin; A C Galloway
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.888

4.  Mitral valve repair with the new semirigid partial Colvin-Galloway Future annuloplasty band.

Authors:  Ruediger Lange; Thomas Guenther; Birgit Kiefer; Christian Noebauer; Wolfgang Goetz; Raymonde Busch; Peter Tassani-Prell; Bernhard Voss; Robert Bauernschmitt
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of changes in mitral valve geometry after valve repair.

Authors:  Feroze Mahmood; Balachundhar Subramaniam; Joseph H Gorman; Robert M Levine; Robert C Gorman; Andrew Maslow; Peter J Panzica; Robert M Hagberg; Swaminathan Karthik; Kamal R Khabbaz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Four decades of experience with mitral valve repair: analysis of differential indications, technical evolution, and long-term outcome.

Authors:  Daniel J DiBardino; Andrew W ElBardissi; R Scott McClure; Ozwaldo A Razo-Vasquez; Nicole E Kelly; Lawrence H Cohn
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Mitral valve repair with the Colvin-Galloway Future Band.

Authors:  Roland Fasol; Johann Meinhart; Manfred Deutsch; Thomas Binder
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  In-vivo motion of mitral valve annuloplasty devices.

Authors:  Jerald Redmond; Dean Christiansen; Cathy Bergin; Lenny Leuer; Tim Ryan; Nancy Rakow; Noah Barka; Tina Billstrom; John A St Cyr; Linda M Shecterle; Eugene Grossi
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2008-01

9.  A study of functional anatomy of aortic-mitral valve coupling using 3D matrix transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Federico Veronesi; Cristiana Corsi; Lissa Sugeng; Victor Mor-Avi; Enrico G Caiani; Lynn Weinert; Claudio Lamberti; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Saddle-shaped mitral valve annuloplasty rings experience lower forces compared with flat rings.

Authors:  Morten O Jensen; Henrik Jensen; Morten Smerup; Robert A Levine; Ajit P Yoganathan; Hans Nygaard; J Michael Hasenkam; Sten L Nielsen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  5 in total

1.  Annular dynamics after mitral valve repair with different prosthetic rings: A real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nishi; Koichi Toda; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Masashi Kawamura; Daisuke Yoshioka; Tetsuya Saito; Takayoshi Ueno; Toru Kuratani; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Impact of different annuloplasty rings on geometry of the mitral annulus with fibroelastic deficiency: the significance of aorto-mitral angle.

Authors:  Wenrui Ma; Wei Ye; Jing Zhang; Wei Zhang; Weihua Wu; Ye Kong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Comparison of saddle-shape flexibility and elliptical-shape stability between Cosgrove-Edwards and Memo-3D annuloplasty rings using three-dimensional analysis software.

Authors:  Akira Tsuneto; Kiyoyuki Eishi; Takashi Miura; Kazuyoshi Tanigawa; Seiji Matsukuma; Takako Minami; Yuji Koide; Satoshi Ikeda; Hiroaki Kawano; Koji Maemura
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-04-06

Review 4.  Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography following mitral valve repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raffael Zamper; Agya Prempeh; Ivan Iglesias; Ashraf Fayad
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-03-14

5.  Three-dimensional dynamic morphology of the mitral valve in different forms of mitral valve prolapse - potential implications for annuloplasty ring selection.

Authors:  Astrid Apor; Anikó Ilona Nagy; Attila Kovács; Aristomenis Manouras; Péter Andrássy; Béla Merkely
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.062

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.