Literature DB >> 3829339

The relationship of mitral annular shape to the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse.

R A Levine, M O Triulzi, P Harrigan, A E Weyman.   

Abstract

The geometric or anatomic diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse, as opposed to the pathologic diagnosis of myxomatous valve disease, is based on the relationship of the mitral leaflets to the surrounding anulus. Current echocardiographic criteria for this diagnosis include leaflet displacement above the annular hinge points in any two-dimensional view; implicit in this equivalent use of intersecting views is the assumption that the mitral anulus is a euclidean plane. Prolapse by these criteria is found in a surprisingly large proportion of the general population. In most of these individuals, however, prolapse is present in the apical four-chamber view and absent in roughly orthogonal long-axis views of the left ventricle. This frequently observed discrepancy between leaflet-annular relationships in intersecting views suggests an underlying geometric property of the mitral apparatus that would produce the appearance of prolapse in one view without actual leaflet distortion. To address this possibility, a model of the mitral valve and anulus was constructed. When the model anulus was given a nonplanar, saddle-shaped configuration, the clinical observations were reproduced: the leaflets appeared to lie above the low points of the anulus in one plane, and below its high points in a perpendicular plane. Therefore, the appearance of mitral valve prolapse can occur without actual leaflet displacement above the most superior points of the mitral anulus if the anulus is nonplanar. To determine whether this pattern is reflected in the human mitral anulus, two-dimensional echocardiographic views of the mitral apparatus were obtained by rotation about the cardiac apex in 20 patients without evident annular or rheumatic valvular disease. In all cases the mitral anulus, as reconstructed from these views, had a nonplanar systolic configuration, with high points located anteriorly and posteriorly. This is consistent with the findings of other groups in animals, and would favor the appearance of prolapse in the four-chamber view and its absence in long-axis views that are oriented anteroposteriorly. This model can therefore explain the frequently observed discrepancy between leaflet-annular relationships in roughly orthogonal views. It challenges the assumption that the mitral anulus is planar as well as the diagnosis of prolapse in many otherwise normal individuals based on that assumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3829339     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.75.4.756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  46 in total

1.  A locus for autosomal dominant mitral valve prolapse on chromosome 11p15.4.

Authors:  Lisa A Freed; James S Acierno; Daisy Dai; Maire Leyne; Jane E Marshall; Francesca Nesta; Robert A Levine; Susan A Slaugenhaupt
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04-21       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Evaluation of mitral valve prolapse using newly developed real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic system with real-time volume rendering.

Authors:  Omer Goktekin; Makoto Matsumura; Ryozo Omoto; Shunei Kyo; Tsuyoshi Mochizuki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Familial clustering of mitral valve prolapse in the community.

Authors:  Francesca N Delling; Jian Rong; Martin G Larson; Birgitta Lehman; Ewa Osypiuk; Plamen Stantchev; Susan A Slaugenhaupt; Emelia J Benjamin; Robert A Levine; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  The extents of mitral leaflet opening and closure are determined by left ventricular systolic function.

Authors:  S Kaul
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Assessment of mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  T Irvine; X K Li; D J Sahn; A Kenny
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Degenerative mitral valve disease with emphasis on mitral valve prolapse.

Authors:  D Pellerin; S Brecker; C Veyrat
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Development of a semi-automated method for mitral valve modeling with medial axis representation using 3D ultrasound.

Authors:  Alison M Pouch; Paul A Yushkevich; Benjamin M Jackson; Arminder S Jassar; Mathieu Vergnat; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Role of Mitral Annulus Diastolic Geometry on Intraventricular Filling Dynamics.

Authors:  Ikechukwu U Okafor; Arvind Santhanakrishnan; Vrishank S Raghav; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 9.  Mitral valve disease--morphology and mechanisms.

Authors:  Robert A Levine; Albert A Hagége; Daniel P Judge; Muralidhar Padala; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Elena Aikawa; Jonathan Beaudoin; Joyce Bischoff; Nabila Bouatia-Naji; Patrick Bruneval; Jonathan T Butcher; Alain Carpentier; Miguel Chaput; Adrian H Chester; Catherine Clusel; Francesca N Delling; Harry C Dietz; Christian Dina; Ronen Durst; Leticia Fernandez-Friera; Mark D Handschumacher; Morten O Jensen; Xavier P Jeunemaitre; Hervé Le Marec; Thierry Le Tourneau; Roger R Markwald; Jean Mérot; Emmanuel Messas; David P Milan; Tui Neri; Russell A Norris; David Peal; Maelle Perrocheau; Vincent Probst; Michael Pucéat; Nadia Rosenthal; Jorge Solis; Jean-Jacques Schott; Ehud Schwammenthal; Susan A Slaugenhaupt; Jae-Kwan Song; Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Marfan syndrome and mitral valve prolapse.

Authors:  Arthur E Weyman; Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.