Aynollah Naderi1, Mohammad Hossein Rezvani1, Hans Degens2. 1. School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Shahrood University of Technology, Semnan, Iran. 2. Department of Life Sciences, Research Centre for Musculoskeletal Science & Sports Medicine, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom and Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Foam rolling (FR) is considered an effective postexercise modality for reducing delayed-onset muscle soreness and enhancing recovery of muscle function. However, the effects of FR on muscle and joint proprioception have not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of FR on muscle and joint proprioception after an intense exercise protocol. DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. SETTING: University-based laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 80 healthy, physically active male students were randomly assigned to either the FR (n = 40; age = 22.8 ± 3.3 years, height = 176.4 ± 5.3 cm, mass = 74.2 ± 6.4 kg) or passive-recovery (PR; n = 40; age = 23.0 ± 3.2 years, height = 178.1 ± 5.5 cm, mass = 74.6 ± 6.2 kg) group. INTERVENTION(S): Participants in both groups performed 4 sets of 25 repetitions of voluntary maximal eccentric contractions at 60°/s from 20° to 100° of knee flexion to induce exercise-induced muscle damage. The exercise was followed by either PR or 2 minutes of FR immediately (1 hour) and 24, 48, and 72 hours postexercise. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Muscle soreness, pressure-pain threshold, quadriceps-muscle strength, joint position sense, isometric force sense, and threshold to detect passive movement at baseline and immediately, 24, 48, and 72 hours postexercise after FR. RESULTS: Foam rolling resulted in decreased muscle pain, increased pressure-pain threshold, improved joint position sense, attenuated force loss, and reduced threshold to detect passive movement compared with PR at 24 and 48 hours postexercise. CONCLUSIONS: Foam rolling postexercise diminished delayed-onset muscle soreness and improved recovery of muscle strength and joint proprioception. These results suggested that FR enhanced recovery from exercise-induced damage.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Foam rolling (FR) is considered an effective postexercise modality for reducing delayed-onset muscle soreness and enhancing recovery of muscle function. However, the effects of FR on muscle and joint proprioception have not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of FR on muscle and joint proprioception after an intense exercise protocol. DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. SETTING: University-based laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 80 healthy, physically active male students were randomly assigned to either the FR (n = 40; age = 22.8 ± 3.3 years, height = 176.4 ± 5.3 cm, mass = 74.2 ± 6.4 kg) or passive-recovery (PR; n = 40; age = 23.0 ± 3.2 years, height = 178.1 ± 5.5 cm, mass = 74.6 ± 6.2 kg) group. INTERVENTION(S): Participants in both groups performed 4 sets of 25 repetitions of voluntary maximal eccentric contractions at 60°/s from 20° to 100° of knee flexion to induce exercise-induced muscle damage. The exercise was followed by either PR or 2 minutes of FR immediately (1 hour) and 24, 48, and 72 hours postexercise. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Muscle soreness, pressure-pain threshold, quadriceps-muscle strength, joint position sense, isometric force sense, and threshold to detect passive movement at baseline and immediately, 24, 48, and 72 hours postexercise after FR. RESULTS: Foam rolling resulted in decreased muscle pain, increased pressure-pain threshold, improved joint position sense, attenuated force loss, and reduced threshold to detect passive movement compared with PR at 24 and 48 hours postexercise. CONCLUSIONS: Foam rolling postexercise diminished delayed-onset muscle soreness and improved recovery of muscle strength and joint proprioception. These results suggested that FR enhanced recovery from exercise-induced damage.
Entities:
Keywords:
athletic performance; manual medicine; pain therapy; sports medicine
Authors: Gregory E P Pearcey; David J Bradbury-Squires; Jon-Erik Kawamoto; Eric J Drinkwater; David G Behm; Duane C Button Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Masatoshi Nakamura; Kazuki Kasahara; Riku Yoshida; Kaoru Yahata; Shigeru Sato; Yuta Murakami; Kodai Aizawa; Andreas Konrad Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alvaro Lopez-Samanes; Juan Del Coso; Jose Luis Hernández-Davó; Diego Moreno-Pérez; Daniel Romero-Rodriguez; Marc Madruga-Parera; Alejandro Muñoz; Victor Moreno-Pérez Journal: Biol Sport Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 4.606