Literature DB >> 27516839

Indications for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Congenital Craniofacial Reconstruction.

Mark Fisher1, Miguel Medina2, Branko Bojovic3, Edward Ahn4, Amir H Dorafshar5.   

Abstract

The complex three-dimensional relationships in congenital craniofacial reconstruction uniquely lend themselves to the ability to accurately plan and model the result provided by computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM). The goal of this study was to illustrate indications where CAD/CAM would be helpful in the treatment of congenital craniofacial anomalies reconstruction and to discuss the application of this technology and its outcomes. A retrospective review was performed of all congenital craniofacial cases performed by the senior author between 2010 and 2014. Cases where CAD/CAM was used were identified, and illustrative cases to demonstrate the benefits of CAD/CAM were selected. Preoperative appearance, computerized plan, intraoperative course, and final outcome were analyzed. Preoperative planning enabled efficient execution of the operative plan with predictable results. Risk factors which made these patients good candidates for CAD/CAM were identified and compiled. Several indications, including multisuture and revisional craniosynostosis, facial bipartition, four-wall box osteotomy, reduction cranioplasty, and distraction osteogenesis could benefit most from this technology. We illustrate the use of CAD/CAM for these applications and describe the decision-making process both before and during surgery. We explore why we believe that CAD/CAM is indicated in these scenarios as well as the disadvantages and risks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD/CAM; computer; congenital; craniofacial; craniosynostosis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27516839      PMCID: PMC4980136          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1584391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  16 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of computer programs in predicting orthognathic surgery soft tissue response.

Authors:  Neelambar R Kaipatur; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction.

Authors:  J G McCarthy; J Schreiber; N Karp; C H Thorne; B H Grayson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Pediatric craniofacial osteosynthesis and distraction using an ultrasonic-assisted pinned resorbable system: a prospective report with a minimum 30 months' follow-up.

Authors:  Eric Arnaud; Dominique Renier
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Computer-aided planning and evaluation of facial and orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  C Cutting; B Grayson; F Bookstein; L Fellingham; J G McCarthy
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Outcome analysis for correction of single suture craniosynostosis using resorbable fixation.

Authors:  A Losken; J K Williams; F D Burstein; S R Cohen; R Hudgins; W Boydston; A Reisner; C Simms
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Bioresorbable fixation for congenital pediatric craniofacial surgery: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  S N Kurpad; J A Goldstein; A R Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.162

7.  Outcomes and complications based on experience with resorbable plates in pediatric craniosynostosis patients.

Authors:  Nawaiz Ahmad; James Lyles; Jayesh Panchal; Jordan Deschamps-Braly
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Resorbable PLLA-PGA plate and screw fixation in pediatric craniofacial surgery: clinical experience in 1883 patients.

Authors:  Barry L Eppley; Louis Morales; Robert Wood; Jay Pensler; Jeff Goldstein; Robert J Havlik; Mutaz Habal; Albert Losken; J Kerwin Williams; Fernando Burstein; Arlene A Rozzelle; A Michael Sadove
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Computer-assisted versus conventional free fibula flap technique for craniofacial reconstruction: an outcomes comparison.

Authors:  Mitchel Seruya; Mark Fisher; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Ultrasound aided pin fixation of biodegradable osteosynthetic materials in cranioplasty for infants with craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Uwe Eckelt; Matthias Nitsche; Annett Müller; Eckart Pilling; Thomas Pinzer; Dietmar Roesner
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.078

View more
  9 in total

1.  Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Marc Anton Fuessinger; Steffen Schwarz; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Marc Christian Metzger; Edward Ellis; Florian Probst; Wiebke Semper-Hogg; Mathieu Gass; Stefan Schlager
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Use of computer-assisted design and manufacturing to localize dural venous sinuses during reconstructive surgery for craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Rajiv R Iyer; Adela Wu; Alexandra Macmillan; Leila Musavi; Regina Cho; Joseph Lopez; George I Jallo; Amir H Dorafshar; Edward S Ahn
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  The Use of Virtual Surgical Planning in Total Facial Skeletal Reconstruction of Treacher Collins Syndrome: A Case Report.

Authors:  Yifan Guo; Joseph Lopez; Robin Yang; Alexandra Macmillan; Amir H Dorafshar
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-07-21

4.  Assessment of a Novel Standardized Training System for Mandibular Contour Surgeries.

Authors:  Jia Qiao; Jia Xu; Xi Fu; Feng Niu; Lai Gui; Sabine Girod; Chung-Kwan Yen; Jianfeng Liu; Ying Chen; Jeffrey W Kwong; Cai Wang; Huijun Zhang; Shixing Xu; Hamzah Alkofahi; Xiaoyan Mao
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

5.  Skeletal Deformity in Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Perceptions of the General Public.

Authors:  Emilie Robertson; Peter Kwan; Gorman Louie; Pierre Boulanger; Daniel Aalto
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-03-25

6.  Applications of Computer Technology in Complex Craniofacial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristopher M Day; Kyle S Gabrick; Larry A Sargent
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-03-06

7.  Virtual Surgical Planning Decreases Operative Time for Isolated Single Suture and Multi-suture Craniosynostosis Repair.

Authors:  Tom W Andrew; Joseph Baylan; Paul A Mittermiller; Homan Cheng; Dana N Johns; Michael S B Edwards; Sam H Cheshier; Gerald A Grant; H Peter Lorenz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-12-17

8.  Evaluation of the application value of a three-dimensional digital model of the knee in clinical practice.

Authors:  Ajimu Keremu; Nuersimanguli Mijiti; Sirejiding Mijiti; Aikebaier Tuxun; Abulikemu Abudurexiti
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  On-site CAD templates reduce surgery time for complex craniostenosis repair in infants: a new method.

Authors:  Markus Lehner; D Wendling-Keim; M Kunz; S Deininger; S Zundel; A Peraud; G Mast
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 1.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.