Literature DB >> 31900627

On-site CAD templates reduce surgery time for complex craniostenosis repair in infants: a new method.

Markus Lehner1,2, D Wendling-Keim3, M Kunz4, S Deininger5,6, S Zundel5, A Peraud4,6, G Mast7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The surgical correction of craniostenosis in children is a time-consuming and taxing procedure. To facilitate this procedure, especially in infants with complex craniostenosis, we refined the computer-aided design and manufacturing technique (CAD/CAM) based on computed tomography (CT)-generated DICOM data. We used cutting guides and molding templates, which allowed the surgeon to reshape and fixate the supraorbital bar extracorporeally on a side table and to control the intracorporal fit without removing the template. METHOD AND PATIENTS: To compare our traditional concept with the possibility of preoperative virtual planning (PVP) technique, the surgical treatment and courses of 16 infants with complex craniostenosis following fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) (age range 8-15 months) were analyzed in two groups (group 1: traditional, control group n = 8, group 2: CAD/CAM planned, n = 8).
RESULTS: While in both groups, the head accurately reshaped postoperatively during the follow-up; the CAD group 2 showed a significantly shorter operating time with a mean of 4 h 25 min compared with group 1 with a mean of 5 h 37 min (p = 0.038). Additionally, the CAD group 2 had a significantly lower volume of blood loss (380 ml vs. 575 ml mean, p = 0.047), lower blood transfusion volume (285 ml vs. 400 ml mean, p = 0.108), lower fresh frozen plasma (FFP) volume (140 ml vs. 275 ml mean, p = 0.019), shorter stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) (3 vs. 5 days mean (p = 0.002), and shorter total length of hospital stay (6 days vs. 8 days mean, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: CAD/CAM cutting guides and templates offer optimizing operative efficiency, precision, and accuracy in craniostenosis surgery in infants. As shown in this single-center observational study, the use of on-site templates significantly accelerates the reconstruction of the bandeau. The virtual 3D planning technique increases surgical precision without discernible detrimental effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAM technique; Children; Fronto-orbital advancement; Pre mature suture synostosis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31900627     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-019-04474-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  39 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment of single-suture craniosynostosis: an argument for quantitative methods to evaluate cosmetic outcomes.

Authors:  Todd C Hankinson; Elizabeth J Fontana; Richard C E Anderson; Neil A Feldstein
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Factors related to blood loss during fronto-orbital advancement.

Authors:  Mitchel Seruya; Albert K Oh; Gary F Rogers; Michael J Boyajian; John S Myseros; Amanda L Yaun; Robert F Keating
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Blood loss estimation during fronto-orbital advancement: implications for blood transfusion practice and hospital length of stay.

Authors:  Mitchel Seruya; Albert K Oh; Gary F Rogers; Kevin D Han; Michael J Boyajian; John S Myseros; Amanda L Yaun; Robert F Keating
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Three-dimensional preoperative virtual planning and template use for surgical correction of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Samir Mardini; Saad Alsubaie; Cenk Cayci; Harvey Chim; Nicholas Wetjen
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Generation of normative pediatric skull models for use in cranial vault remodeling procedures.

Authors:  Nikoo R Saber; John Phillips; Thomas Looi; Zoha Usmani; Jonathan Burge; James Drake; Peter C W Kim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Clinical Evaluation of Standardized Fronto-Orbital Advancement for Correction of Isolated Trigonocephaly.

Authors:  Ali-Farid Safi; Matthias Kreppel; Andrea Grandoch; Martin Kauke; Hans-Joachim Nickenig; Joachim Zöller
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Craniofacial Skeleton With Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging ("Black Bone"): What Is Currently Possible?

Authors:  Karen A Eley; Stephen R Watt-Smith; Stephen J Golding
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Calvarial remodelling surgery: Neurosurgical experience of multidisciplinary craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Abdul Ghaffar; Zahid Hussain; Shahzad Ahmed Qasmi; Shahid Hameed Chaudhry
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.781

9.  Intracranial pressure in craniostenosis.

Authors:  D Renier; C Sainte-Rose; D Marchac; J F Hirsch
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 10.  Papilledema: epidemiology, etiology, and clinical management.

Authors:  Mohammed Rigi; Sumayya J Almarzouqi; Michael L Morgan; Andrew G Lee
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2015-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.