Literature DB >> 27515024

Does Wyoming's Core Area Policy Protect Winter Habitats for Greater Sage-Grouse?

Kurt T Smith1, Jeffrey L Beck2, Aaron C Pratt2.   

Abstract

Conservation reserves established to protect important habitat for wildlife species are used world-wide as a wildlife conservation measure. Effective reserves must adequately protect year-round habitats to maintain wildlife populations. Wyoming's Sage-Grouse Core Area policy was established to protect breeding habitats for greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Protecting only one important seasonal habitat could result in loss or degradation of other important habitats and potential declines in local populations. The purpose of our study was to identify the timing of winter habitat use, the extent which individuals breeding in Core Areas used winter habitats, and develop resource selection functions to assess effectiveness of Core Areas in conserving sage-grouse winter habitats in portions of 5 Core Areas in central and north-central Wyoming during winters 2011-2015. We found that use of winter habitats occured over a longer period than current Core Area winter timing stipulations and a substantial amount of winter habitat outside of Core Areas was used by individuals that bred in Core Areas, particularly in smaller Core Areas. Resource selection functions for each study area indicated that sage-grouse were selecting habitats in response to landscapes dominated by big sagebrush and flatter topography similar to other research on sage-grouse winter habitat selection. The substantial portion of sage-grouse locations and predicted probability of selection during winter outside small Core Areas illustrate that winter requirements for sage-grouse are not adequately met by existing Core Areas. Consequently, further considerations for identifying and managing important winter sage-grouse habitats under Wyoming's Core Area Policy are warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centrocercus urophasianus; Resource selection functions; Sage-grouse; Winter habitat selection; Wyoming sage-grouse core area policy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27515024     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0745-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  8 in total

1.  Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations.

Authors:  W Pan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity?

Authors:  John Fieberg; Jason Matthiopoulos; Mark Hebblewhite; Mark S Boyce; Jacqueline L Frair
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The point process use-availability or presence-only likelihood and comments on analysis.

Authors:  Trent L McDonald
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Factors contributing to process variance in annual survival of female greater sage-grouse in Montana.

Authors:  Brendan J Moynahan; Mark S Lindberg; Jack Ward Thomas
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Identifying Greater Sage-Grouse source and sink habitats for conservation planning in an energy development landscape.

Authors:  Christopher P Kirol; Jeffrey L Beck; Snehalata V Huzurbazar; Matthew J Holloran; Scott N Miller
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Linking occurrence and fitness to persistence: habitat-based approach for endangered greater sage-grouse.

Authors:  Cameron L Aldridge; Mark S Boyce
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Measuring the effectiveness of conservation: a novel framework to quantify the benefits of sage-grouse conservation policy and easements in Wyoming.

Authors:  Holly E Copeland; Amy Pocewicz; David E Naugle; Tim Griffiths; Doug Keinath; Jeffrey Evans; James Platt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Spatial heterogeneity in response of male greater sage-grouse lek attendance to energy development.

Authors:  Andrew J Gregory; Jeffrey L Beck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Wyoming's Sage-Grouse Core Areas: Influences on Energy Development and Male Lek Attendance.

Authors:  R Scott Gamo; Jeffrey L Beck
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Probability of lek collapse is lower inside sage-grouse Core Areas: Effectiveness of conservation policy for a landscape species.

Authors:  Emma Suzuki Spence; Jeffrey L Beck; Andrew J Gregory
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Separating Proactive Conservation from Species Listing Decisions.

Authors:  Adrienne I Kovach; Amanda E Cheeseman; Jonathan B Cohen; Chadwick D Rittenhouse; Christopher M Whipps
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.644

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.