Literature DB >> 17489256

Linking occurrence and fitness to persistence: habitat-based approach for endangered greater sage-grouse.

Cameron L Aldridge1, Mark S Boyce.   

Abstract

Detailed empirical models predicting both species occurrence and fitness across a landscape are necessary to understand processes related to population persistence. Failure to consider both occurrence and fitness may result in incorrect assessments of habitat importance leading to inappropriate management strategies. We took a two-stage approach to identifying critical nesting and brood-rearing habitat for the endangered Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in Alberta at a landscape scale. First, we used logistic regression to develop spatial models predicting the relative probability of use (occurrence) for Sage-Grouse nests and broods. Secondly, we used Cox proportional hazards survival models to identify the most risky habitats across the landscape. We combined these two approaches to identify Sage-Grouse habitats that pose minimal risk of failure (source habitats) and attractive sink habitats that pose increased risk (ecological traps). Our models showed that Sage-Grouse select for heterogeneous patches of moderate sagebrush cover (quadratic relationship) and avoid anthropogenic edge habitat for nesting. Nests were more successful in heterogeneous habitats, but nest success was independent of anthropogenic features. Similarly, broods selected heterogeneous high-productivity habitats with sagebrush while avoiding human developments, cultivated cropland, and high densities of oil wells. Chick mortalities tended to occur in proximity to oil and gas developments and along riparian habitats. For nests and broods, respectively, approximately 10% and 5% of the study area was considered source habitat, whereas 19% and 15% of habitat was attractive sink habitat. Limited source habitats appear to be the main reason for poor nest success (39%) and low chick survival (12%). Our habitat models identify areas of protection priority and areas that require immediate management attention to enhance recruitment to secure the viability of this population. This novel approach to habitat-based population viability modeling has merit for many species of concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17489256     DOI: 10.1890/05-1871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  33 in total

Review 1.  The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use-availability designs.

Authors:  Hawthorne L Beyer; Daniel T Haydon; Juan M Morales; Jacqueline L Frair; Mark Hebblewhite; Michael Mitchell; Jason Matthiopoulos
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Multi-scale habitat selection affects offspring survival in a precocial species.

Authors:  P M Bloom; R G Clark; D W Howerter; L M Armstrong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Predicting population change from models based on habitat availability and utilization.

Authors:  Jason Matthiopoulos; Christopher Field; Ross MacLeod
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Effectiveness of Wyoming's Sage-Grouse Core Areas: Influences on Energy Development and Male Lek Attendance.

Authors:  R Scott Gamo; Jeffrey L Beck
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Use of Fish Telemetry in Rehabilitation Planning, Management, and Monitoring in Areas of Concern in the Laurentian Great Lakes.

Authors:  J L Brooks; C Boston; S Doka; D Gorsky; K Gustavson; D Hondorp; D Isermann; J D Midwood; T C Pratt; A M Rous; J L Withers; C C Krueger; S J Cooke
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Balancing energy development and conservation: a method utilizing species distribution models.

Authors:  Catherine S Jarnevich; Murray K Laubhan
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Identifying and prioritizing greater sage-grouse nesting and brood-rearing habitat for conservation in human-modified landscapes.

Authors:  Matthew R Dzialak; Chad V Olson; Seth M Harju; Stephen L Webb; James P Mudd; Jeffrey B Winstead; L D Hayden-Wing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A currency for offsetting energy development impacts: horse-trading sage-grouse on the open market.

Authors:  Kevin E Doherty; David E Naugle; Jeffrey S Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mitigation effectiveness for improving nesting success of greater sage-grouse influenced by energy development.

Authors:  Christopher P Kirol; Andrew L Sutphin; Laura Bond; Mark R Fuller; Thomas L Maechtle
Journal:  Wildlife Biol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.474

10.  Mapping oil and gas development potential in the US Intermountain West and estimating impacts to species.

Authors:  Holly E Copeland; Kevin E Doherty; David E Naugle; Amy Pocewicz; Joseph M Kiesecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.