Literature DB >> 27826693

Effectiveness of Wyoming's Sage-Grouse Core Areas: Influences on Energy Development and Male Lek Attendance.

R Scott Gamo1, Jeffrey L Beck2.   

Abstract

Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) populations have declined across their range due to human-assisted factors driving large-scale habitat change. In response, the state of Wyoming implemented the Sage-grouse Executive Order protection policy in 2008 as a voluntary regulatory mechanism to minimize anthropogenic disturbance within defined sage-grouse core population areas. Our objectives were to evaluate areas designated as Sage-grouse Executive Order Core Areas on: (1) oil and gas well pad development, and (2) peak male lek attendance in core and non-core sage-grouse populations. We conducted our evaluations at statewide and Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies management zone (MZ I and MZ II) scales. We used Analysis of Covariance modeling to evaluate change in well pad development from 1986-2014 and peak male lek attendance from 958 leks with consistent lek counts within increasing (1996-2006) and decreasing (2006-2013) timeframes for Core and non-core sage-grouse populations. Oil and gas well pad development was restricted in Core Areas. Trends in peak male sage-grouse lek attendance were greater in Core Areas compared to non-core areas at the statewide scale and in MZ II, but not in MZ I, during population increase. Trends in peak male lek attendance did not differ statistically between Core and non-core population areas statewide, in MZ I, or MZ II during population decrease. Our results provide support for the effectiveness of Core Areas in maintaining sage-grouse populations in Wyoming, but also indicate the need for increased conservation actions to improve sage-grouse population response in MZ I.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centrocercus urophasianus; Core area; Greater sage-grouse; Impact assessment; Natural resource policy; Population monitoring; Wyoming Sage-grouse executive order

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27826693     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0789-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  Identifying Greater Sage-Grouse source and sink habitats for conservation planning in an energy development landscape.

Authors:  Christopher P Kirol; Jeffrey L Beck; Snehalata V Huzurbazar; Matthew J Holloran; Scott N Miller
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  Population cycles are highly correlated over long time series and large spatial scales in two unrelated species: greater sage-grouse and cottontail rabbits.

Authors:  Bradley C Fedy; Kevin E Doherty
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Identifying and prioritizing greater sage-grouse nesting and brood-rearing habitat for conservation in human-modified landscapes.

Authors:  Matthew R Dzialak; Chad V Olson; Seth M Harju; Stephen L Webb; James P Mudd; Jeffrey B Winstead; L D Hayden-Wing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Linking occurrence and fitness to persistence: habitat-based approach for endangered greater sage-grouse.

Authors:  Cameron L Aldridge; Mark S Boyce
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Mitigation effectiveness for improving nesting success of greater sage-grouse influenced by energy development.

Authors:  Christopher P Kirol; Andrew L Sutphin; Laura Bond; Mark R Fuller; Thomas L Maechtle
Journal:  Wildlife Biol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.474

6.  Does Wyoming's Core Area Policy Protect Winter Habitats for Greater Sage-Grouse?

Authors:  Kurt T Smith; Jeffrey L Beck; Aaron C Pratt
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Measuring the effectiveness of conservation: a novel framework to quantify the benefits of sage-grouse conservation policy and easements in Wyoming.

Authors:  Holly E Copeland; Amy Pocewicz; David E Naugle; Tim Griffiths; Doug Keinath; Jeffrey Evans; James Platt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Combined effects of energy development and disease on greater sage-grouse.

Authors:  Rebecca L Taylor; Jason D Tack; David E Naugle; L Scott Mills
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Spatial heterogeneity in response of male greater sage-grouse lek attendance to energy development.

Authors:  Andrew J Gregory; Jeffrey L Beck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Probability of lek collapse is lower inside sage-grouse Core Areas: Effectiveness of conservation policy for a landscape species.

Authors:  Emma Suzuki Spence; Jeffrey L Beck; Andrew J Gregory
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Local and population-level responses of Greater sage-grouse to oil and gas development and climatic variation in Wyoming.

Authors:  Rob R Ramey; Joseph L Thorley; Alexander S Ivey
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 3.  Separating Proactive Conservation from Species Listing Decisions.

Authors:  Adrienne I Kovach; Amanda E Cheeseman; Jonathan B Cohen; Chadwick D Rittenhouse; Christopher M Whipps
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.644

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.