Literature DB >> 27506571

Early aseptic loosening of cementless monoblock acetabular components.

Simo S A Miettinen1, Tatu J Mäkinen2, Inari Laaksonen3, Keijo Mäkelä3, Heini Huhtala4, Jukka Kettunen1, Ville Remes5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Early aseptic loosening of cementless monoblock acetabular components is a rare complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for early aseptic loosening of the cementless monoblock acetabular components.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis consisted of 4,043 cementless hip devices (3,209 THAs and 834 HRAs). We identified 41 patients with early aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. A control group of 123 patients without acetabular component loosening was randomly selected. The demographic data and risk factors for loosening of the acetabular component were evaluated. The mean follow-up time was 4.6 years (range, 1.7-7.8). The end-point was acetabular revision.
RESULTS: The incidence of early acetabular component loosening was 1.0 %. Mean time to revision was 1.2 years (SD 1.6, range 0.0-5.4). There was significantly more Dorr type A and C acetabular morphology in patients with early loosening (P = 0.014). The loosened components were implanted to more vertical (P < 0.001) and less anteverted (P = 0.001) position than those of the control group. Presence of acetabular dysplasia or acetabular component type did not associate to early loosening.
CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular morphology (Dorr type A and C) and component positioning vertically and less anteverted were more common in patients with early aseptic loosening of cementless acetabular components. Suboptimal cup position most likely reflects challenges to obtain sufficient stability during surgery. We hypothesize that errors in surgical technique are the main reason for early loosening of monoblock acetabular components.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular morphology; Aseptic loosening; Case–control study; Cup positioning; Hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27506571     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3254-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  26 in total

1.  Long-term results with the Atlas IIIp elastic cementless acetabular component in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Paul Yuh Feng Lee; Madhu Rachala; Kar Ho Teoh; David John Woodnutt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Is the acetabular cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty on a two dimension or three dimension model accurate?

Authors:  Benjamin Craiovan; Tobias Renkawitz; Markus Weber; Joachim Grifka; Lutz Nolte; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Failure rate of cemented and uncemented total hip replacements: register study of combined Nordic database of four nations.

Authors:  Keijo T Mäkelä; Markus Matilainen; Pekka Pulkkinen; Anne M Fenstad; Leif Havelin; Lars Engesaeter; Ove Furnes; Alma B Pedersen; Søren Overgaard; Johan Kärrholm; Henrik Malchau; Göran Garellick; Jonas Ranstam; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-01-13

4.  Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  J F Crowe; V J Mani; C S Ranawat
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

6.  Radiographic anatomic structure of the arthritic acetabulum and its influence on total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  L D Dorr; C O Bechtol; R G Watkins; Z Wan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure.

Authors:  David Fabi; Brett Levine; Wayne Paprosky; Craig Della Valle; Scott Sporer; Gregg Klein; Harlan Levine; Mark Hartzband
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Callum W McBryde; Kanthan Theivendran; Andrew M C Thomas; Ronan B C Treacy; Paul B Pynsent
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Hip resurfacing in patients under thirty years old: an attractive option for young and active patients.

Authors:  Nicolas Krantz; Bruno Miletic; Henri Migaud; Julien Girard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Rachel Nichols; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  4 in total

1.  Incidence and risk factors of in-hospital prosthesis-related complications following total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective Nationwide Inpatient Sample database study.

Authors:  Qinfeng Yang; Jian Wang; Yichuan Xu; Yuhang Chen; Qiang Lian; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Management of Paprosky type three B acetabular defects by custom-made components: early results.

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Matteo Giachino; Paolo Bedino; Danilo Mellano; Raimondo Piana; Alessandro Massè
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A retrospective study on the relationship between altered native acetabular angle and vertical implant malpositioning.

Authors:  Jorge Rojas; Maria Bautista; Guillermo Bonilla; Omar Amado; Elina Huerfano; Daniel Monsalvo; Adolfo Llinás; José Navas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Laser Resonance Frequency Analysis: A Novel Measurement Approach to Evaluate Acetabular Cup Stability During Surgery.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kikuchi; Katsuhiro Mikami; Daisuke Nakashima; Toshiyuki Kitamura; Noboru Hasegawa; Masaharu Nishikino; Arihiko Kanaji; Masaya Nakamura; Takeo Nagura
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.