Literature DB >> 27503393

Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster.

Jinhai Huang1,2, Giacomo Savini3, Kenneth J Hoffer4, Hao Chen1,2, Weicong Lu1,2, Qingjie Hu1,2, Fangjun Bao1,2, Qinmei Wang1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the precision of the measurements in healthy subjects obtained with a new optical biometer (OA-2000, Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and compare these measurements with those provided by the IOLMaster v5.4 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) using partial coherence interferometry (PCI).
METHODS: Axial length (AL), keratometry (K) over 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm diameters, anterior chamber depth (ACD) (corneal epithelium to lens), lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness and corneal diameter (CD) were measured with SS-OCT by two experienced operators. Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility were assessed. AL, ACD, K and CD were also measured with PCI for agreement analysis using Bland-Altman plots.
RESULTS: Sixty-five eyes of 65 normal subjects were enrolled in the prospective study. The SS-OCT measurements revealed high repeatability and reproducibility with low test-retest repeatability, low within-subject coefficient of variation (CoV) and high intraclass correlation coefficients. Bland-Altman analysis showed narrow 95% limits of agreement for most parameters indicating excellent agreement for AL (-0.05 mm to 0.07 mm), K values both at 2.5 mm (-0.42 D to 0.20 D) and 3.0 mm (-0.42 D to 0.08 D) and ACD (-0.19 mm to 0.22 mm) except for the CD (-1.11 mm to -0.01 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: The repeatability and reproducibility of SS-OCT were excellent for all parameters including AL, K, ACD, LT and CD values. High agreement was shown between SS-OCT and PCI for most biometrical parameters. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior chamber; Cornea; Imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27503393     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  20 in total

1.  Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using three optical biometry measurement devices: the OA-2000, Lenstar-LS900 and IOLMaster-500.

Authors:  Olga Reitblat; Adi Levy; Guy Kleinmann; Ehud I Assia
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Comparison of ocular parameters of two biometric measurement devices in highly myopic eyes.

Authors:  Xiao-Xiao Guo; Ran You; Shan-Shan Li; Xiu-Fen Yang; Lu Zhao; Fan Zhang; Yan-Ling Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Evaluation of the repeatability of optical coherence tomography in patients with age-related cataract associated with dry eye.

Authors:  Fen Yang; Ying Chang; Lu Yang; Zhijie Jia; Jiewei Liu; Yan Wang
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.029

4.  Repeatability of total Keratometry and standard Keratometry by the IOLMaster 700 and comparison to total corneal astigmatism by Scheimpflug imaging.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Leonardo Taroni; Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello; Kenneth J Hoffer
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.456

5.  Precision of a new ocular biometer in children and comparison with IOLMaster.

Authors:  Xinxin Yu; Hao Chen; Giacomo Savini; Qianqian Zheng; Benhao Song; Ruixue Tu; Jinhai Huang; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Changes in the anterior segment after cycloplegia with a biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Tomoaki Higashiyama; Maki Iwasa; Masahito Ohji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry.

Authors:  Rongrong Gao; Hao Chen; Giacomo Savini; Yaxin Miao; Xiaorui Wang; Jing Yang; Weiqi Zhao; Qinmei Wang; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparison of a new biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a conventional biometer using partial coherence interferometry.

Authors:  Tomoaki Higashiyama; Hazuki Mori; Fumi Nakajima; Masahito Ohji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Precision of a new ocular biometer in eyes with cataract using swept source optical coherence tomography combined with Placido-disk corneal topography.

Authors:  Wenwen Wang; Yaxin Miao; Giacomo Savini; Colm McAlinden; Hao Chen; Qingjie Hu; Qinmei Wang; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer.

Authors:  Tommy C Y Chan; Marco C Y Yu; Vivian Chiu; Gilda Lai; Christopher K S Leung; Poemen P M Chan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.