Literature DB >> 27502339

The evolution of intraoperative conversion in video assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

A Vallance1, P Tcherveniakov1, C Bogdan1, N Chaudhuri1, R Milton1, E Kefaloyannis1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Unplanned conversion to thoracotomy remains a major concern in video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. This study aimed to investigate the development of a VATS lobectomy programme over a five-year period, with a focus on the causes and consequences of unplanned conversions. METHODS A single centre retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent complete anatomical lung resection initiated by VATS between January 2010 and April 2015. RESULTS In total, 1,270 patients underwent a lobectomy in the study period and 684 (53.9%) of these were commenced thoracoscopically. There were 75 cases (10.9%) with unplanned conversion. The proportion of lobectomies started as VATS was significantly higher in the second half of the study period (2010-2012: 277/713 [38.8%], 2013-2015: 407/557 [73.1%], p<0.001). The conversion rate dropped initially from 20.4% (11/54) in 2010 to 9.9% (15/151) in 2013 and then remained consistently under 10% until 2015. Conversions were most commonly secondary to vascular injury (26/75, 34.7%). Patients undergoing unplanned conversion had a longer length of stay than VATS completed patients (9 vs 6 days, p<0.001). There was a higher incidence of respiratory failure (10/75 [14.1%] vs 23/607 [3.8%], p<0.001) and 30-day mortality (7/75 [9.3%] vs 6/607 [1.0%], p=0.003) in patients with unplanned conversion than in those with completed VATS. CONCLUSIONS As our VATS lobectomy programme developed, the unplanned conversion rate dropped initially and then remained constant at approximately 10%. With increasing unit experience, it is both safe and technically possible to complete the majority of lobectomy procedures thoracoscopically.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung neoplasms; Pulmonary surgical procedures; Thoracotomy; Video assisted thoracic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27502339      PMCID: PMC5392817          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  22 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 12,397 patients.

Authors:  T R Scott; K A Zucker; R W Bailey
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1992-09

2.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database.

Authors:  Subroto Paul; Nasser K Altorki; Shubin Sheng; Paul C Lee; David H Harpole; Mark W Onaitis; Brendon M Stiles; Jeffrey L Port; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Executive Summary: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck; Sandra Zelman Lewis; Rebecca Diekemper; Doreen Addrizzo-Harris; W Michael Alberts
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Analysis of Unexpected Conversion to Thoracotomy During Thoracoscopic Lobectomy in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Chun Sung Byun; Sungsoo Lee; Dae Joon Kim; Jin Gu Lee; Chang Young Lee; Inkyung Jung; Kyung Young Chung
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Intraoperative conversion from video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy to open thoracotomy: a study of causes and implications.

Authors:  Varun Puri; Aalok Patel; Kaustav Majumder; Jennifer M Bell; Traves D Crabtree; A Sasha Krupnick; Daniel Kreisel; Stephen R Broderick; G Alexander Patterson; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases.

Authors:  Robert J McKenna; Ward Houck; Clark Beeman Fuller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  A method of assessing reasons for conversion during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Sayf Gazala; Ian Hunt; Azim Valji; Kenneth Stewart; Ericl R Bédard
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-03-09

8.  VATS lobectomy has better perioperative outcomes than open lobectomy: CALGB 31001, an ancillary analysis of CALGB 140202 (Alliance).

Authors:  Chukwumere E Nwogu; Jonathan D'Cunha; Herbert Pang; Lin Gu; Xiaofei Wang; William G Richards; Linda J Veit; Todd L Demmy; David J Sugarbaker; Leslie J Kohman; Scott J Swanson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Raja M Flores; Bernard J Park; Joseph Dycoco; Anna Aronova; Yael Hirth; Nabil P Rizk; Manjit Bains; Robert J Downey; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Causes, predictors and consequences of conversion from VATS to open lung lobectomy.

Authors:  Florian Augustin; Herbert Thomas Maier; Annemarie Weissenbacher; Caecilia Ng; Paolo Lucciarini; Dietmar Öfner; Hanno Ulmer; Thomas Schmid
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  International expert consensus on the management of bleeding during VATS lung surgery.

Authors:  Lunxu Liu; Jiandong Mei; Jie He; Todd L Demmy; Shugeng Gao; Shanqing Li; Jianxing He; Yang Liu; Yunchao Huang; Shidong Xu; Jian Hu; Liang Chen; Yuming Zhu; Qingquan Luo; Weimin Mao; Qunyou Tan; Chun Chen; Xiaofei Li; Zhu Zhang; Gening Jiang; Lin Xu; Lanjun Zhang; Jianhua Fu; Hui Li; Qun Wang; Deruo Liu; Lijie Tan; Qinghua Zhou; Xiangning Fu; Zhongmin Jiang; Haiquan Chen; Wentao Fang; Xun Zhang; Yin Li; Ti Tong; Zhentao Yu; Yongyu Liu; Xiuyi Zhi; Tiansheng Yan; Xingyi Zhang; Qiang Pu; Guowei Che; Yidan Lin; Lin Ma; Raul Embun; Javier Aragón; Serdar Evman; Gregor J Kocher; Luca Bertolaccini; Alessandro Brunelli; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; Joel Dunning; Hui-Ping Liu; Scott J Swanson; Ryabov Andrey Borisovich; Inderpal S Sarkaria; Alan Dart Loon Sihoe; Takeshi Nagayasu; Takuro Miyazaki; Masayuki Chida; Tadasu Kohno; Agasthian Thirugnanam; Harmic J Soukiasian; Mark W Onaitis; Chia-Chuan Liu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

2.  Estimating the risk of conversion from video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery to thoracotomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexandra D Power; Robert E Merritt; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce; Desmond M D'Souza; Peter J Kneuertz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Did conversion to thoracotomy during thoracoscopic lobectomy increase post-operative complications and prejudice survival? Results of best evidence topic analysis.

Authors:  Alfonso Fiorelli; Stefano Forte; Mario Santini; René Horsleben Petersen; Wentao Fang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Worse outcomes after conversion of thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Gabryel; Cezary Piwkowski; Mariusz Kasprzyk; Paweł Zieliński; Magdalena Roszak; Wojciech Dyszkiewicz
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08

5.  A novel guiding tube modified from a Foley catheter for endostapling during robot-assisted pulmonary resection.

Authors:  Fuqiang Wang; Hanlu Zhang; Yu Zheng; Yun Wang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.