Literature DB >> 26335073

Causes, predictors and consequences of conversion from VATS to open lung lobectomy.

Florian Augustin1, Herbert Thomas Maier2, Annemarie Weissenbacher2, Caecilia Ng2, Paolo Lucciarini2, Dietmar Öfner2, Hanno Ulmer3, Thomas Schmid2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To analyze causes, predictors and consequences of conversions from intended VATS lobectomy to open surgery.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database.
RESULTS: From 2009 until December 2012, 232 patients were scheduled for anatomical VATS resection. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 15 (6.5 %) patients. Reasons for conversion were bleeding in six, oncologic in five and technical in four patients (adhesions after pleuritis or radiotherapy for other tumors: 3; limited space: 1). In a univariable exact logistic regression analysis, conversion rate was significantly higher in patients after induction therapy (p = 0.019). There was also a statistical trend to a higher conversion rate in patients with larger tumor size (<3 vs. ≥3 cm, p = 0.117) and during the first half of our series (p = 0.107). Conversion rate was not influenced by patient age, nodal stage (pN0 vs. pN+), body mass index, the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung function (FEV1) or benign disease. In a multivariable exact logistic regression, induction treatment (p = 0.013) and tumor size (p = 0.04) were independent significant risk factors for conversion. Conversion did not translate into higher overall postoperative complication rate (33.3 vs. 29.5 %), longer chest drain duration (median, 5 vs. 5 days) or in-hospital mortality (0 vs. 1 %). However, length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the conversion group (median 11 vs. 9 days, p = 0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: Induction therapy was an independent risk factor for conversion to thoracotomy in this VATS lobectomy series. Following induction therapy, patients should be carefully selected for a VATS approach. Conversion to thoracotomy did not increase the postoperative rate of complications or mortality, but significantly increased length of hospital stay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conversion; Risk factor; Thoracotomy; VATS

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26335073     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4492-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

Review 1.  Thoracoscopic maneuvers for chest wall resection and reconstruction.

Authors:  Todd L Demmy; Sai Yendamuri; Mark W Hennon; Elisabeth U Dexter; Anthony L Picone; Chukwumere Nwogu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Does Previous Surgical Training Impact the Learning Curve in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Trainees?

Authors:  Andrea Billè; Lawrence Okiror; Karen Harrison-Phipps; Tom Routledge
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Executive Summary: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck; Sandra Zelman Lewis; Rebecca Diekemper; Doreen Addrizzo-Harris; W Michael Alberts
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  T J Kirby; T W Rice
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Intraoperative conversion from video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy to open thoracotomy: a study of causes and implications.

Authors:  Varun Puri; Aalok Patel; Kaustav Majumder; Jennifer M Bell; Traves D Crabtree; A Sasha Krupnick; Daniel Kreisel; Stephen R Broderick; G Alexander Patterson; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases.

Authors:  Robert J McKenna; Ward Houck; Clark Beeman Fuller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Total video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) resection of a left-sided sulcus superior tumor after induction radiochemotherapy: video and review.

Authors:  Martin Reichert; Stefanie Kerber; Anca-Laura Amati; Johannes Bodner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Advantages of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for adult congenital hernia with severe adhesion: report of two cases.

Authors:  Shinji Nakashima; Atsushi Watanabe; Makoto Hashimoto; Taijirou Mishina; Takuro Obama; Tetsuya Higami
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.520

9.  VATS lobectomy has better perioperative outcomes than open lobectomy: CALGB 31001, an ancillary analysis of CALGB 140202 (Alliance).

Authors:  Chukwumere E Nwogu; Jonathan D'Cunha; Herbert Pang; Lin Gu; Xiaofei Wang; William G Richards; Linda J Veit; Todd L Demmy; David J Sugarbaker; Leslie J Kohman; Scott J Swanson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  The N2 paradox: similar outcomes of pre- and postoperatively identified single-zone N2a positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Tsitsias; Anas Boulemden; Keng Ang; Apostolos Nakas; David A Waller
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 4.191

View more
  20 in total

1.  Improving Operating Room Efficiency via Reduction and Standardization of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Instrumentation.

Authors:  Tynan H Friend; Ashley Paula; Jason Klemm; Mark Rosa; Wilton Levine
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Intraoperative complications during VATS lobectomies from conversion to minimally-invasive "trouble-shooting".

Authors:  Paolo Lucciarini; Florian Augustin; Herbert Thomas Maier; Francesco Zaraca; Thomas Schmid
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-02-03

Review 3.  Troubleshooting in thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  Atsushi Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Catastrophes and complicated intraoperative events during robotic lung resection.

Authors:  Brian E Louie
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-04-10

5.  Intraoperative conversion from video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy to thoracotomy for non-small-cell lung cancer: Does it have an impact on long-term survival?

Authors:  Zhi-Zhen Ren; Han-Yu Deng; Weijia Huang; Qinghua Zhou
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

6.  Risk factors and impact of conversion from VATS to open lobectomy: analysis from a national database.

Authors:  Stefano Bongiolatti; Alessandro Gonfiotti; Domenico Viggiano; Sara Borgianni; Leonardo Politi; Roberto Crisci; Carlo Curcio; Luca Voltolini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The evolution of intraoperative conversion in video assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  A Vallance; P Tcherveniakov; C Bogdan; N Chaudhuri; R Milton; E Kefaloyannis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Management of calcified hilar lymph nodes during thoracoscopic lobectomies: avoidance of conversions.

Authors:  Zeyao Li; Yingze Li; Long Wang; Liang Duan; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; Gening Jiang; Chang Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Presence of pleural adhesions can predict conversion to thoracotomy and postoperative surgical complications in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lung cancer lobectomy.

Authors:  Shuang-Jiang Li; Kun Zhou; Yan-Ming Wu; Ming-Ming Wang; Cheng Shen; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Guo-Wei Che; Lun-Xu Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Worse outcomes after conversion of thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Gabryel; Cezary Piwkowski; Mariusz Kasprzyk; Paweł Zieliński; Magdalena Roszak; Wojciech Dyszkiewicz
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.