Ji Won Ryu1, Seung Il Jung2, Ji Hoon Ahn1, Eu Chang Hwang1, Ho Song Yu1, Taek Won Kang1, Dong Deuk Kwon1, Kwangsung Park1, Jin Woong Kim3. 1. Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160 Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 61469, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160 Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 61469, Republic of Korea. drjsi@yahoo.co.kr. 3. Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of povidone-iodine rectal disinfection and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy based on rectal swab culture results. METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2015, we studied differences in infectious complications in men who received povidone-iodine rectal disinfection with targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis and those who received empirical prophylaxis before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Clinical variables including demographics, prior antibiotic, rectal swab culture results, povidone-iodine rectal cleansing, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infectious complications were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups as follows: Group A received no povidone-iodine rectal cleansing but received empirical antimicrobial prophylaxis; group B received povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and empirical antimicrobial prophylaxis; and group C received povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis. RESULTS: Patients were divided into group A (n = 192; 13.2 %), group B (n = 579; 39.9 %), or group C (n = 679; 46.8 %). In groups A and B, all patients received fluoroquinolone antimicrobial prophylaxis. Group C patients received targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis according to antibiotic resistance of rectal flora, and 71.1 % of these received fluoroquinolone antimicrobial prophylaxis. Infectious complication rates were 3.6, 2.9, and 1.3 % in group A, group B, and group C, respectively. Incidences of acute prostatitis and bacteremia were significantly lower in group C (p = 0.041 and p = 0.049, respectively) than in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the era of quinolone resistance, the combination of povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and targeted antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the rate of infectious complications.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of povidone-iodine rectal disinfection and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy based on rectal swab culture results. METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2015, we studied differences in infectious complications in men who received povidone-iodine rectal disinfection with targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis and those who received empirical prophylaxis before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Clinical variables including demographics, prior antibiotic, rectal swab culture results, povidone-iodine rectal cleansing, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infectious complications were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups as follows: Group A received no povidone-iodine rectal cleansing but received empirical antimicrobial prophylaxis; group B received povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and empirical antimicrobial prophylaxis; and group C received povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis. RESULTS:Patients were divided into group A (n = 192; 13.2 %), group B (n = 579; 39.9 %), or group C (n = 679; 46.8 %). In groups A and B, all patients received fluoroquinolone antimicrobial prophylaxis. Group C patients received targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis according to antibiotic resistance of rectal flora, and 71.1 % of these received fluoroquinolone antimicrobial prophylaxis. Infectious complication rates were 3.6, 2.9, and 1.3 % in group A, group B, and group C, respectively. Incidences of acute prostatitis and bacteremia were significantly lower in group C (p = 0.041 and p = 0.049, respectively) than in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the era of quinolone resistance, the combination of povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and targeted antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the rate of infectious complications.
Authors: D Steensels; K Slabbaert; L De Wever; P Vermeersch; H Van Poppel; J Verhaegen Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: J Stuart Wolf; Carol J Bennett; Roger R Dmochowski; Brent K Hollenbeck; Margaret S Pearle; Anthony J Schaeffer Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-02-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Matthew J Roberts; Deborah A Williamson; Paul Hadway; Suhail A R Doi; Robert A Gardiner; David L Paterson Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2014-02-09 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Stacy Loeb; Suzanne van den Heuvel; Xiaoye Zhu; Chris H Bangma; Fritz H Schröder; Monique J Roobol Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-01-05 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Aisha K Taylor; Teresa R Zembower; Robert B Nadler; Marc H Scheetz; John P Cashy; Diana Bowen; Adam B Murphy; Elodi Dielubanza; Anthony J Schaeffer Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Robert K Nam; Refik Saskin; Yuna Lee; Ying Liu; Calvin Law; Laurence H Klotz; D Andrew Loblaw; John Trachtenberg; Aleksandra Stanimirovic; Andrew E Simor; Arun Seth; David R Urbach; Steven A Narod Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Michael A Liss; Alexandra Chang; Rosanne Santos; Amy Nakama-Peeples; Ellena M Peterson; Kathryn Osann; John Billimek; Richard J Szabo; Atreya Dash Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Rosa Park; Justin Gyorfi; Kalyan Dewan; Girish Kirimanjeswara; Joseph Y Clark; Matthew G Kaag; Kathleen Lehman; Jay D Raman Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: George M Viola; Kenneth V Rolston; Charles Butler; Jesse Selber; Gregory Reece; Mark Clemens; Mark Villa; Issam I Raad; Donald Baumann Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2019-07-26