Literature DB >> 21958149

Fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli in intestinal flora of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy--should we reassess our practices for antibiotic prophylaxis?

D Steensels1, K Slabbaert, L De Wever, P Vermeersch, H Van Poppel, J Verhaegen.   

Abstract

Although the estimate of the incidence of sepsis following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB) is low, fluoroquinolone-resistant infections after prostate biopsy are being increasingly noted. This study was aimed at determining the prevalence of faecal carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli strains before TRUSPB and at evaluating potential predisposing risk factors. The incidence of sepsis after prostate biopsy was determined, and our routine practice for antibiotic prophylaxis for TRUSPB was evaluated. A prospective study was conducted in 342 consecutive patients undergoing prostate biopsy between December 2009 and July 2010. Before TRUSPB, a rectal swab was cultured. The correlation between the presence of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains and plausible risk factors was investigated by the use of a questionnaire. Of the 236 patients included, 22.0% (52/236) harboured ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli strains. The use of fluoroquinolones in the 6 months before biopsy was associated with an increased risk of faecal carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli strains (p <0.01). Faecal carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli strains was an important risk factor for infectious complications after TRUSPB (p <0.01). In conclusion, a significant number of patients have faecal carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli strains (22.0%) before TRUSPB. The use of fluoroquinolones in the previous 6 months before biopsy is a risk factor for faecal carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli strains and for infectious complications after TRUSPB. Hence, the universal administration of fluoroquinolones should be reconsidered.
© 2011 The Authors. Clinical Microbiology and Infection © 2011 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958149     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03638.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  50 in total

Review 1.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Infective complications in patients after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and the role of ciprofloxacin resistant Escherichia coli colonization in rectal flora.

Authors:  Mustafa Bilal Hamarat; Fatih Tarhan; Rahim Horuz; Gülfem Akengin Öcal; Mehmet Kutlu Demirkol; Alper Kafkaslı; Özgür Yazıcı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

Review 3.  Prevention and treatment of biopsy-related complications.

Authors:  Ramgopal Satyanarayana; Dipen Parekh
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  [Infection and sepsis prevention in prostate biopsy].

Authors:  F M E Wagenlehner; A Pilatz; P Waliszewski; T Dansranjavin; W Weidner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Transperineal gold marker implantation for image-guided external beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer : A single institution, prospective study.

Authors:  Kliton Jorgo; Péter Ágoston; Tibor Major; Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy; Csaba Polgár
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Performance Validation of Selective Screening Agars for Guiding Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Sofie C M Tops; Marlie Bruens; Sacha van Mook-Vermulst; Diane Lamers-Jansen; Tobias Engel; Ger van den Brink; Rob van Duuren; Heiman F L Wertheim; Eva Kolwijck
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Screening rectal culture to identify fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms before transrectal prostate biopsy: do the culture results between office visit and biopsy correlate?

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Kristen K Nakamura; Rachel Meuleners; Surendra B Kolla; Atreya Dash; Ellena M Peterson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy are associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications.

Authors:  Ji Won Ryu; Seung Il Jung; Ji Hoon Ahn; Eu Chang Hwang; Ho Song Yu; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park; Jin Woong Kim
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  Reducing the risk of infection for transrectal prostate biopsy with povidone-iodine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chunxiao Pu; Yunjin Bai; Haichao Yuan; Jinhong Li; Yin Tang; Jia Wang; Qiang Wei; Ping Han
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Comparison of broth enhancement to direct plating for screening of rectal cultures for ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Kristen K Nakamura; Ellena M Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.