Literature DB >> 23234616

Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Robert K Nam1, Refik Saskin, Yuna Lee, Ying Liu, Calvin Law, Laurence H Klotz, D Andrew Loblaw, John Trachtenberg, Aleksandra Stanimirovic, Andrew E Simor, Arun Seth, David R Urbach, Steven A Narod.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is widely used to confirm the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The technique has been associated with significant morbidity in a small proportion of patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population based study of 75,190 men who underwent a transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in Ontario, Canada, between 1996 and 2005. We used hospital and cancer registry administrative databases to estimate the rates of hospital admission and mortality due to urological complications associated with the procedure.
RESULTS: Of the 75,190 men who underwent transrectal ultrasound biopsy 33,508 (44.6%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 41,682 (55.4%) did not have prostate cancer. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure for men without cancer was 1.9% (781/41,482). The 30-day hospital admission rate increased from 1.0% in 1996 to 4.1% in 2005 (p for trend <0.0001). The majority of hospital admissions (72%) were for infection related reasons. The probability of being admitted to hospital within 30 days of having the procedure increased 4-fold between 1996 and 2005 (OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.0-7.0, p <0.0001). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 0.09% but did not change during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: The hospital admission rates for complications following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy have increased dramatically during the last 10 years primarily due to an increasing rate of infection related complications.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23234616     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  68 in total

Review 1.  Prevention and treatment of biopsy-related complications.

Authors:  Ramgopal Satyanarayana; Dipen Parekh
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  An antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Stephen J Summers; Darshan P Patel; Blake D Hamilton; Angela P Presson; Mark A Fisher; William T Lowrance; Andrew W Southwick
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Prevalence of infections associated with prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Meena Davuluri; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2014

Review 4.  Prostate MRI and transperineal TRUS/MRI fusion biopsy for prostate cancer detection: clinical practice updates.

Authors:  Eugenio Martorana; Giacomo Maria Pirola; Maria Cristina Aisa; Pietro Scialpi; Aldo Di Blasi; Giovanni Saredi; Alfredo D'Andrea; Stefano Signore; Riccardo Grisanti; Michele Scialpi
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-07-01

5.  2018 CUA Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy are associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications.

Authors:  Ji Won Ryu; Seung Il Jung; Ji Hoon Ahn; Eu Chang Hwang; Ho Song Yu; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park; Jin Woong Kim
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Zero hospital admissions for infection after 577 transperineal prostate biopsies using single-dose cephazolin prophylaxis.

Authors:  Lana Pepdjonovic; Guan Hee Tan; Sean Huang; Sarah Mann; Mark Frydenberg; Daniel Moon; Uri Hanegbi; Adam Landau; Ross Snow; Jeremy Grummet
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Increase of prostate biopsy-related bacteremic complications in southern Finland, 2005-2013: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  K Lahdensuo; A Rannikko; V-J Anttila; A Erickson; A Pätäri-Sampo; M Rautio; H Santti; E Tarkka; M Vaara; K Huotari
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Focusing PSA testing on detection of high-risk prostate cancers by incorporating patient preferences into decision making.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Robin J Leach; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Pathologic findings in patients with targeted magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate needle core biopsies.

Authors:  Rachel L Geller; Sherif G Nour; Adeboye O Osunkoya
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.