Literature DB >> 27491396

Risk Score for Predicting Treatment-Requiring Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) in the Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-Phase ROP Study.

Gui-Shuang Ying1, Deborah VanderVeen2, Ebenezer Daniel3, Graham E Quinn4, Agnieshka Baumritter4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a risk score for predicting treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity (TR-ROP) in the Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-Phase Retinopathy of Prematurity (e-ROP) study.
DESIGN: Second analyses of an observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Infants with birth weight (BW) <1251 g who had ≥1 imaging session by 34 weeks of postmenstrual age (PMA) and ≥1 subsequent retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) examination for determining TR-ROP by study-certified ophthalmologists.
METHODS: Nonphysician trained readers evaluated wide-field retinal image sets for characteristics of ROP, pre-plus/plus disease, and retinal hemorrhage. Risk score points for predicting TR-ROP were derived from the regression coefficients of significant predictors in a multivariate logistic regression model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: TR-ROP.
RESULTS: Eighty-five of 771 infants (11.0%) developed TR-ROP. In a multivariate model, significant predictors for TR-ROP were gestational age (GA) (odds ratio [OR], 5.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-18.9 for ≤25 vs. ≥28 weeks), need for respiratory support (OR, 7.0; 95% CI, 1.3-37.1 for high-frequency oscillatory ventilation vs. no respiratory support), slow weight gain (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-4.6 for weight gain ≤12 g/day vs. >15 g/day), and image findings at the first image session including number of quadrants with pre-plus (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.5-9.7 for 4 pre-plus quadrants vs. no pre-plus), stage and zone of ROP (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 2.1-11.8 for stage 1-2 zone I, OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 2.1-16.6 for stage 3 zone I vs. no ROP), and presence of blot hemorrhage (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4-6.7). Image findings predicted TR-ROP better than GA (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.82 vs. 0.75, P = 0.03). The risk of TR-ROP steadily increased with higher risk score and predicted TR-ROP well (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.92). Risk score ≥3 points for predicting TR-ROP had a sensitivity of 98.8%, specificity of 40.1%, and positive and negative predictive values of 17.0% and 99.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Image characteristics at 34 PMA weeks or earlier independently predict TR-ROP. If externally validated in other infants, risk score, calculated from image findings, GA, weight gain, and respiratory support, enables early identification of infants in need of increased surveillance for TR-ROP.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27491396      PMCID: PMC5035617          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  25 in total

Review 1.  The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity revisited.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07

2.  Telemedical retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: accuracy, reliability, and image quality.

Authors:  Michael F Chiang; Lu Wang; Mihai Busuioc; Yunling E Du; Patrick Chan; Steven A Kane; Thomas C Lee; David J Weissgold; Audina M Berrocal; Osode Coki; John T Flynn; Justin Starren
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11

Review 3.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Safety of Retinopathy of Prematurity Examination and Imaging in Premature Infants.

Authors:  Kelly C Wade; Maxwell Pistilli; Agnieshka Baumritter; Karen Karp; Alice Gong; Alex R Kemper; Gui-Shuang Ying; Graham Quinn
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Risk analysis and an alternative protocol for reduction of screening for retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Michael B Yang; Edward F Donovan
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  The CHOP postnatal weight gain, birth weight, and gestational age retinopathy of prematurity risk model.

Authors:  Gil Binenbaum; Gui-Shuang Ying; Graham E Quinn; Jiayan Huang; Stephan Dreiseitl; Jules Antigua; Negar Foroughi; Soraya Abbasi
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12

7.  Validity of a telemedicine system for the evaluation of acute-phase retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Graham E Quinn; Gui-shuang Ying; Ebenezer Daniel; P Lloyd Hildebrand; Anna Ells; Agnieshka Baumritter; Alex R Kemper; Eleanor B Schron; Kelly Wade
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Wide-field digital retinal imaging versus binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy for retinopathy of prematurity screening: a two-observer prospective, randomised comparison.

Authors:  C Dhaliwal; E Wright; C Graham; N McIntosh; B W Fleck
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Wide-field digital imaging based telemedicine for screening for acute retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Six-year results of a multicentre field study.

Authors:  Birgit Lorenz; Katerina Spasovska; Heike Elflein; Nico Schneider
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  The KIDROP model of combining strategies for providing retinopathy of prematurity screening in underserved areas in India using wide-field imaging, tele-medicine, non-physician graders and smart phone reporting.

Authors:  Anand Vinekar; Clare Gilbert; Mangat Dogra; Mathew Kurian; Gangadharan Shainesh; Bhujang Shetty; Noel Bauer
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Advances in understanding and management of retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Mary Elizabeth Hartnett
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 2.  Retinopathy of prematurity: a review of risk factors and their clinical significance.

Authors:  Sang Jin Kim; Alexander D Port; Ryan Swan; J Peter Campbell; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 6.048

3.  Detection of Potentially Severe Retinopathy of Prematurity by Remote Image Grading.

Authors:  Graham E Quinn; Gui-Shuang Ying; Wei Pan; Agnieshka Baumritter; Ebenezer Daniel
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Efficacy evaluation of intravitreal ranibizumab therapy for three types of retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Qiong Zou; Yan-Qiong Zhu; Feng-Jun Zhang; Qiu-Ping Liu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Progression from preplus to plus disease in the Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-Phase Retinopathy of Prematurity (e-ROP) Study: incidence, timing, and predictors.

Authors:  Qianqian Ellie Cheng; Graham E Quinn; Ebenezer Daniel; Agnieshka Baumritter; Eli Smith; Gui-Shuang Ying
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Risk Factors Associated with Retinopathy of Prematurity in Very and Extremely Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Claudia Ioana Borțea; Florina Stoica; Marioara Boia; Emil Radu Iacob; Mihai Dinu; Roxana Iacob; Daniela Iacob
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Tutorial on Biostatistics: Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis for Correlated Eye Data.

Authors:  Gui-Shuang Ying; Maureen G Maguire; Robert J Glynn; Bernard Rosner
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-12

8.  POTENTIAL UTILITY OF FOVEAL MORPHOLOGY IN PRETERM INFANTS MEASURED USING HAND-HELD OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY SCREENING.

Authors:  Samira Anwar; Mintu Nath; Aarti Patel; Helena Lee; Samantha Brown; Irene Gottlob; Frank A Proudlock
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.975

Review 9.  Translational Research in Retinopathy of Prematurity: From Bedside to Bench and Back Again.

Authors:  Mitsuru Arima; Yuya Fujii; Koh-Hei Sonoda
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Role of cytokines and treatment algorithms in retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  M Elizabeth Hartnett
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.