Graham E Quinn1, Gui-shuang Ying2, Ebenezer Daniel2, P Lloyd Hildebrand3, Anna Ells4, Agnieshka Baumritter1, Alex R Kemper5, Eleanor B Schron6, Kelly Wade7. 1. Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City. 4. University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 5. Program on Pediatric Health Services Research, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 6. Division of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 7. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The present strategy to identify infants needing treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requires repeated examinations of at-risk infants by physicians. However, less than 10% ultimately require treatment. Retinal imaging by nonphysicians with remote image interpretation by nonphysicians may provide a more efficient strategy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of a telemedicine system to identify infants who have sufficiently severe ROP to require evaluation by an ophthalmologist. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An observational study of premature infants starting at 32 weeks' postmenstrual age was conducted. This study involved 1257 infants with birth weight less than 1251 g in neonatal intensive care units in 13 North American centers enrolled from May 25, 2011, through October 31, 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Infants underwent regularly scheduled diagnostic examinations by an ophthalmologist and digital imaging by nonphysician staff using a wide-field digital camera. Ophthalmologists documented findings consistent with referral-warranted (RW) ROP (ie, zone I ROP, stage 3 ROP or worse, or plus disease). A standard 6-image set per eye was sent to a central server and graded by 2 trained, masked, nonphysician readers. A reading supervisor adjudicated disagreements. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The validity of grading retinal image sets was based on the sensitivity and specificity for detecting RW-ROP compared with the criterion standard diagnostic examination. RESULTS: A total of 1257 infants (mean birth weight, 864 g; mean gestational age, 27 weeks) underwent a median of 3 sessions of examinations and imaging. Diagnostic examination identified characteristics of RW-ROP in 18.2% of eyes (19.4% of infants). Remote grading of images of an eye at a single session had sensitivity of 81.9% (95% CI, 77.4-85.6) and specificity of 90.1% (95% CI, 87.9-91.8). When both eyes were considered for the presence of RW-ROP, as would routinely be done in a screening, the sensitivity was 90.0% (95% CI, 85.4-93.5), with specificity of 87.0% (95% CI, 84.0-89.5), negative predictive value of 97.3%, and positive predictive value of 62.5% at the observed RW-ROP rate of 19.4%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: When compared with the criterion standard diagnostic examination, these results provide strong support for the validity of remote evaluation by trained nonphysician readers of digital retinal images taken by trained nonphysician imagers from infants at risk for RW-ROP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01264276.
IMPORTANCE: The present strategy to identify infants needing treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requires repeated examinations of at-risk infants by physicians. However, less than 10% ultimately require treatment. Retinal imaging by nonphysicians with remote image interpretation by nonphysicians may provide a more efficient strategy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of a telemedicine system to identify infants who have sufficiently severe ROP to require evaluation by an ophthalmologist. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An observational study of premature infants starting at 32 weeks' postmenstrual age was conducted. This study involved 1257 infants with birth weight less than 1251 g in neonatal intensive care units in 13 North American centers enrolled from May 25, 2011, through October 31, 2013. INTERVENTIONS:Infants underwent regularly scheduled diagnostic examinations by an ophthalmologist and digital imaging by nonphysician staff using a wide-field digital camera. Ophthalmologists documented findings consistent with referral-warranted (RW) ROP (ie, zone I ROP, stage 3 ROP or worse, or plus disease). A standard 6-image set per eye was sent to a central server and graded by 2 trained, masked, nonphysician readers. A reading supervisor adjudicated disagreements. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The validity of grading retinal image sets was based on the sensitivity and specificity for detecting RW-ROP compared with the criterion standard diagnostic examination. RESULTS: A total of 1257 infants (mean birth weight, 864 g; mean gestational age, 27 weeks) underwent a median of 3 sessions of examinations and imaging. Diagnostic examination identified characteristics of RW-ROP in 18.2% of eyes (19.4% of infants). Remote grading of images of an eye at a single session had sensitivity of 81.9% (95% CI, 77.4-85.6) and specificity of 90.1% (95% CI, 87.9-91.8). When both eyes were considered for the presence of RW-ROP, as would routinely be done in a screening, the sensitivity was 90.0% (95% CI, 85.4-93.5), with specificity of 87.0% (95% CI, 84.0-89.5), negative predictive value of 97.3%, and positive predictive value of 62.5% at the observed RW-ROP rate of 19.4%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: When compared with the criterion standard diagnostic examination, these results provide strong support for the validity of remote evaluation by trained nonphysician readers of digital retinal images taken by trained nonphysician imagers from infants at risk for RW-ROP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01264276.
Authors: Chatarina Löfqvist; Ingrid Hansen-Pupp; Eva Andersson; Kristina Holm; Lois E H Smith; David Ley; Ann Hellström Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2009-05
Authors: Hilal Biten; Travis K Redd; Chace Moleta; J Peter Campbell; Susan Ostmo; Karyn Jonas; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Kelly C Wade; Maxwell Pistilli; Agnieshka Baumritter; Karen Karp; Alice Gong; Alex R Kemper; Gui-Shuang Ying; Graham Quinn Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: J Peter Campbell; Esra Ataer-Cansizoglu; Veronica Bolon-Canedo; Alican Bozkurt; Deniz Erdogmus; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Samir N Patel; James D Reynolds; Jason Horowitz; Kelly Hutcheson; Michael Shapiro; Michael X Repka; Phillip Ferrone; Kimberly Drenser; Maria Ana Martinez-Castellanos; Susan Ostmo; Karyn Jonas; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Nikolas N Raufi; Caleb K Morris; Sharon F Freedman; David K Wallace; S Grace Prakalapakorn Journal: J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 1.402
Authors: Kelly C Wade; Gui-Shuang Ying; Agnieshka Baumritter; Alice Gong; Alex R Kemper; Graham E Quinn Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 7.389