Literature DB >> 27475216

Release from masking for small spatial separations: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan1, Kasey M Jakien1, Frederick J Gallun1.   

Abstract

Spatially separating target and masking speech can result in substantial spatial release from masking (SRM) for normal-hearing listeners. In this study, SRM was examined at eight spatial configurations of azimuth angle: maskers co-located with the target (0°) or symmetrically separated by 2°, 4°, 6°, 8°, 10°, 15°, or 30°. Results revealed that different listening groups (young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and older hearing-impaired) required different minimum amounts of spatial separation between target and maskers to achieve SRM. The results also indicated that aging was the contributing factor predicting SRM at smaller separations, whereas hearing loss was the contributing factor at larger separations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27475216      PMCID: PMC5392088          DOI: 10.1121/1.4954386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.

Authors:  R S Bolia; W T Nelson; M A Ericson; B D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.

Authors:  Tanya L Arbogast; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The influence of spatial separation on divided listening.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Frederick J Gallun; Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task.

Authors:  Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptually relevant parameters for virtual listening simulation of small room acoustics.

Authors:  Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Release from masking due to spatial separation of sources in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; T L Rohtla; P S Deliwala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Sharon Cameron; Harvey Dillon; Louise Hickson; Mark Seeto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Independent impacts of age and hearing loss on spatial release in a complex auditory environment.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Anna C Diedesch; Sean D Kampel; Kasey M Jakien
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  22 in total

1.  The role of early and late reflections on spatial release from masking: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan; Meghan Stansell; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of envelope modulations on binaural processing.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Stephen Fong; Olga Stakhovskaya
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Xing Wang; Ning-Yu Wang; Xin Fu; Tian Gan; John J Galvin; Shelby Willis; Kevin Xu; Mathew Thomas; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Spatial Release From Masking in Adults With Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Effects of Distracter Azimuth and Microphone Location.

Authors:  Timothy J Davis; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  Enhancing Auditory Selective Attention Using a Visually Guided Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Comparing Spatial Release From Masking Using Traditional Methods and Portable Automated Rapid Testing iPad App.

Authors:  Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan; Allison Holtz; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Can visual capture of sound separate auditory streams?

Authors:  Chiara Valzolgher; Elena Giovanelli; Roberta Sorio; Giuseppe Rabini; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The search for correlates of age-related cochlear synaptopathy: Measures of temporal envelope processing and spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Chhayakanta Patro; Heather A Kreft; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.