Literature DB >> 27473435

Determinants of preferred ground clearance during swing phase of human walking.

Amy R Wu1, Arthur D Kuo2.   

Abstract

During each step of human walking, the swing foot passes close to the ground with a small but (usually) non-zero clearance. The foot can occasionally scuff against the ground, with some risk of stumbling or tripping. The risk might be mitigated simply by lifting the foot higher, but presumably at increased effort, of unknown amount. Perhaps the normally preferred ground clearance is a trade-off between competing costs, one for lifting the foot higher and one for scuffing it. We tested this by measuring the metabolic energy cost of lifting and scuffing the foot, treating these apparently dissimilar behaviors as part of a single continuum, where scuffing is a form of negative foot lift. We measured young, healthy adults (N=9) lifting or scuffing the foot by various amounts mid-swing during treadmill walking, and observed substantial costs, each well capable of doubling the net metabolic rate for normal walking (gross cost minus that for standing). In relative terms, the cost for scuffing increased over twice as steeply as that for lifting. That relative difference means that the expected value of cost, which takes into account movement variability, occurs at a non-zero mean clearance, approximately matching the preferred clearance we observed. Energy cost alone is only a lower bound on the overall disadvantages of inadvertent ground contact, but it is sufficient to show how human behavior may be determined not only by the separate costs of different trade-offs but also by movement variability, which can influence the average cost actually experienced in practice.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Energetic cost; Foot–ground clearance; Locomotion; Metabolic power

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27473435      PMCID: PMC5091653          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.137356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  22 in total

1.  Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model.

Authors:  Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  A systematic review of the effect of ageing and falls history on minimum foot clearance characteristics during level walking.

Authors:  R S Barrett; P M Mills; R K Begg
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  The effects of everyday concurrent tasks on overground minimum toe clearance and gait parameters.

Authors:  Brian W Schulz; John D Lloyd; William E Lee
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Foot trajectory in human gait: a precise and multifactorial motor control task.

Authors:  D A Winter
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1992-01

5.  Ageing effects on knee and ankle joint angles at key events and phases of the gait cycle.

Authors:  R K Begg; W A Sparrow
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

6.  Energetic cost of producing cyclic muscle force, rather than work, to swing the human leg.

Authors:  Jiro Doke; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man.

Authors:  J M Brockway
Journal:  Hum Nutr Clin Nutr       Date:  1987-11

8.  Energetic costs of producing muscle work and force in a cyclical human bouncing task.

Authors:  Jesse C Dean; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-01-06

9.  Elastic coupling of limb joints enables faster bipedal walking.

Authors:  J C Dean; A D Kuo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  The effects of walking speed on minimum toe clearance and on the temporal relationship between minimum clearance and peak swing-foot velocity in unilateral trans-tibial amputees.

Authors:  Alan R De Asha; John G Buckley
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  4 in total

1.  Humans optimally anticipate and compensate for an uneven step during walking.

Authors:  Osman Darici; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Optimal regulation of bipedal walking speed despite an unexpected bump in the road.

Authors:  Osman Darici; Hakan Temeltas; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A simple model of mechanical effects to estimate metabolic cost of human walking.

Authors:  Salman Faraji; Amy R Wu; Auke J Ijspeert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Does posture explain the kinematic differences in a grounded running gait between male and female Svalbard rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta hyperborea) moving on snow?

Authors:  Andres Marmol-Guijarro; Robert Nudds; Lars Folkow; John Lees; Jonathan Codd
Journal:  Polar Biol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.310

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.