Literature DB >> 1728048

Foot trajectory in human gait: a precise and multifactorial motor control task.

D A Winter1.   

Abstract

The trajectory of the heel and toe during the swing phase of human gait were analyzed on young adults. The magnitude and variability of minimum toe clearance and heel-contact velocity were documented on 10 repeat walking trials on 11 subjects. The energetics that controlled step length resulted from a separate study of 55 walking trials conducted on subjects walking at slow, natural, and fast cadences. A sensitivity analysis of the toe clearance and heel-contact velocity measures revealed the individual changes at each joint in the link-segment chain that could be responsible for changes in those measures. Toe clearance was very small (1.29 cm) and had low variability (about 4 mm). Heel-contact velocity was negligible vertically and small (0.87 m/s) horizontally. Six joints in the link-segment chain could, with very small changes (+/- 0.86 degrees - +/- 3.3 degrees), independently account for toe clearance variability. Only one muscle group in the chain (swing-phase hamstring muscles) could be responsible for altering the heel-contact velocity prior to heel contact. Four mechanical power phases in gait (ankle push-off, hip pull-off, knee extensor eccentric power at push-off, and knee flexor eccentric power prior to heel contact) could alter step length and cadence. These analyses demonstrate that the safe trajectory of the foot during swing is a precise endpoint control task that is under the multisegment motor control of both the stance and swing limbs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1728048     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/72.1.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  68 in total

1.  The effects of everyday concurrent tasks on overground minimum toe clearance and gait parameters.

Authors:  Brian W Schulz; John D Lloyd; William E Lee
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Modelling of the toe trajectory during normal gait using circle-fit approximation.

Authors:  Juan Fang; Kenneth J Hunt; Le Xie; Guo-Yuan Yang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Vibrotactile stimulation of fast-adapting cutaneous afferents from the foot modulates proprioception at the ankle joint.

Authors:  Robyn L Mildren; Leah R Bent
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-01-28

4.  Three-dimensional kinematics and dynamics of the foot during walking: a model of central control mechanisms.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Osaki; Mikhail Kunin; Bernard Cohen; Theodore Raphan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Relative contribution of walking velocity and stepping frequency to the neural control of locomotion.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Osaki; Mikhail Kunin; Bernard Cohen; Theodore Raphan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Falls and frailty: lessons from complex systems.

Authors:  Abigail Nowak; Ruth E Hubbard
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Foot trajectory approximation using the pendulum model of walking.

Authors:  Juan Fang; Aleksandra Vuckovic; Sujay Galen; Bernard A Conway; Kenneth J Hunt
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Effect of a robotic restraint gait training versus robotic conventional gait training on gait parameters in stroke patients.

Authors:  Céline Bonnyaud; Raphael Zory; Julien Boudarham; Didier Pradon; Djamel Bensmail; Nicolas Roche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Is There an Optimal Recovery Step Landing Zone Against Slip-Induced Backward Falls During Walking?

Authors:  Shuaijie Wang; Yi-Chung Pai; Tanvi Bhatt
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Minimum toe clearance adaptations to floor surface irregularity and gait speed.

Authors:  Brian W Schulz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.