Literature DB >> 17575044

Energetic cost of producing cyclic muscle force, rather than work, to swing the human leg.

Jiro Doke1, Arthur D Kuo.   

Abstract

We compared two hypothesized energetic costs for swinging the human leg quickly. The first cost is to perform mechanical work on the leg, and the second is to produce muscle force cyclically at high frequencies. Substantial metabolic energy is expended to perform isolated leg swinging, especially at rates greater than the leg's natural pendular frequency. To determine whether the production of muscle force contributes to this cost, we measured oxygen consumption in human subjects (N=6) performing isolated swinging of the leg at frequencies 0.7-1.1 Hz. Amplitude of swing was varied as a function of frequency so that the rate of positive mechanical work performed on the leg remained fixed. We expected that the cost of producing force would increase, in contrast to the cost of performing work. The results showed that average rate of positive mechanical work performed on the leg remained nearly constant as a function of frequency, at 0.073+/-0.014 W kg(-1). Net metabolic rate, however, increased by 53%, from 0.66 W kg(-1) to 1.01 W kg(-1). Work may be performed on the leg and with a proportional metabolic cost, but it cannot explain the substantial increases observed here. Metabolic energy expenditure appears to increase in proportion with muscle force or torque, and in inverse proportion to duration of force. This energetic cost may be associated with cyclical calcium transport, where rate-limiting of crossbridge attachments may require greater sarcoplasmic calcium concentration at high frequencies of leg swinging to produce the same amplitude of muscle force. It may also be relevant to moving the legs back and forth relative to the body during walking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17575044     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  30 in total

1.  Stance and swing phase costs in human walking.

Authors:  Brian R Umberger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Ankle fixation need not increase the energetic cost of human walking.

Authors:  Matthew T Vanderpool; Steven H Collins; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Mechanical efficiency of limb swing during walking and running in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris).

Authors:  Jonas Rubenson; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-02-19

4.  Biomechanics and energetics of walking on uneven terrain.

Authors:  Alexandra S Voloshina; Arthur D Kuo; Monica A Daley; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Dynamic principles of gait and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Arthur D Kuo; J Maxwell Donelan
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-12-18

6.  Determinants of preferred ground clearance during swing phase of human walking.

Authors:  Amy R Wu; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  USE OF SPATIOTEMPORAL GAIT PARAMETERS TO DETERMINE RETURN TO SPORTS AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION.

Authors:  Gustavo Leporace; Leonardo Metsavaht; Gabriel Zeitoune; Thiago Marinho; Tainá Oliveira; Glauber Ribeiro Pereira; Liszt Palmeira D E Oliveira; Luiz Alberto Batista
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

8.  Elastic coupling of limb joints enables faster bipedal walking.

Authors:  J C Dean; A D Kuo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  The role of series ankle elasticity in bipedal walking.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Tzu-Wei P Huang; Peter G Adamczyk; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Mechanics and energetics of load carriage during human walking.

Authors:  Tzu-Wei P Huang; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.