Literature DB >> 21212245

Energetic costs of producing muscle work and force in a cyclical human bouncing task.

Jesse C Dean1, Arthur D Kuo.   

Abstract

Muscles expend energy to perform active work during locomotion, but they may also expend significant energy to produce force, for example when tendons perform much of the work passively. The relative contributions of work and force to overall energy expenditure are unknown. We therefore measured the mechanics and energetics of a cyclical bouncing task, designed to control for work and force. We hypothesized that near bouncing resonance, little work would be performed actively by muscle, but the cyclical production of force would cost substantial metabolic energy. Human subjects (n = 9) bounced vertically about the ankles at inversely proportional frequencies (1-4 Hz) and amplitudes (15-4 mm), such that the overall rate of work performed on the body remained approximately constant (0.30 ± 0.06 W/kg), but the forces varied considerably. We used parameter identification to estimate series elasticity of the triceps surae tendon, as well as the work performed actively by muscle and passively by tendon. Net metabolic energy expenditure for bouncing at 1 Hz was 1.15 ± 0.31 W/kg, attributable mainly to active muscle work with an efficiency of 24 ± 3%. But at 3 Hz (near resonance), most of the work was performed passively, so that active muscle work could account for only 40% of the net metabolic rate of 0.76 ± 0.28 W/kg. Near resonance, a cost for cyclical force that increased with both amplitude and frequency of force accounted for at least as much of the total energy expenditure as a cost for work. Series elasticity reduces the need for active work, but energy must still be expended for force production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21212245      PMCID: PMC3075134          DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00505.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  28 in total

1.  A simple model of bipedal walking predicts the preferred speed-step length relationship.

Authors:  A D Kuo
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model.

Authors:  Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Mechanics of human triceps surae muscle in walking, running and jumping.

Authors:  A L Hof; J P Van Zandwijk; M F Bobbert
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  2002-01

4.  Dynamic optimization of human walking.

Authors:  F C Anderson; M G Pandy
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Force platforms as ergometers.

Authors:  G A Cavagna
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 3.531

6.  The role played by elasticity in an exercise involving movements of small amplitude.

Authors:  H Thys; G A Cavagna; R Margaria
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 3.657

7.  Positive and negative work performances and their efficiencies in human locomotion.

Authors:  R Margaria
Journal:  Int Z Angew Physiol       Date:  1968-05-28

8.  In vivo behaviour of human muscle tendon during walking.

Authors:  T Fukunaga; K Kubo; Y Kawakami; S Fukashiro; H Kanehisa; C N Maganaris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  In vivo muscle fibre behaviour during counter-movement exercise in humans reveals a significant role for tendon elasticity.

Authors:  Y Kawakami; T Muraoka; S Ito; H Kanehisa; T Fukunaga
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Speed dependence of averaged EMG profiles in walking.

Authors:  A L Hof; H Elzinga; W Grimmius; J P K Halbertsma
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.840

View more
  17 in total

1.  Unconstrained muscle-tendon workloops indicate resonance tuning as a mechanism for elastic limb behavior during terrestrial locomotion.

Authors:  Benjamin D Robertson; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Interaction between step-to-step variability and metabolic cost of transport during human walking.

Authors:  Chase G Rock; Vivien Marmelat; Jennifer M Yentes; Ka-Chun Siu; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Determinants of preferred ground clearance during swing phase of human walking.

Authors:  Amy R Wu; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  The effects of compression stockings on the energetics and biomechanics during walking.

Authors:  Longfei Cheng; Caihua Xiong
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Gradual mechanics-dependent adaptation of medial gastrocnemius activity during human walking.

Authors:  Molly A Wellinghoff; Alison M Bunchman; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Proprioceptive feedback and preferred patterns of human movement.

Authors:  Jesse C Dean
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.230

7.  Modeling age-related changes in muscle-tendon dynamics during cyclical contractions in the rat gastrocnemius.

Authors:  Nicole Danos; Natalie C Holt; Gregory S Sawicki; Emanuel Azizi
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-08-04

8.  Mechanics and energetics of load carriage during human walking.

Authors:  Tzu-Wei P Huang; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Timing matters: tuning the mechanics of a muscle-tendon unit by adjusting stimulation phase during cyclic contractions.

Authors:  Gregory S Sawicki; Benjamin D Robertson; Emanuel Azizi; Thomas J Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Mechanical work as an indirect measure of subjective costs influencing human movement.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.