Literature DB >> 24388005

Time course of pseudoneglect in scene viewing.

Antje Nuthmann1, Ellen Matthias2.   

Abstract

When we view the visual world, our eyes move from one location to another about three times each second. When looking at pictures of natural scenes, neurologically intact individuals show a leftward bias in the direction of their first eye movement. The present study investigates the time course of this pseudoneglect and how it depends on task-related control. Eye movements were recorded from 72 participants, each viewing 135 scenes under three different viewing instructions (memorization, esthetic preference judgment, object-in-scene search). In the memorization and preference tasks, pseudoneglect had a maximum extent of about 1° and lasted for about 1500 msec, or 5 fixations. The effect was somewhat reduced in the preference task, which gave subjects free reign to fixate anywhere they wanted to. During scene search, a task that is guided primarily by top-down control, observers also showed a distinct pseudoneglect. Strikingly, a leftward bias was present even when the search object was located in the right hemispace. Search performance was not affected by the observed spatial asymmetries. The effects likely arise from a right-hemisphere dominance for visuo-spatial attention.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Eye movements; Hemispheric asymmetry; Pseudoneglect; Scene perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24388005     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  18 in total

1.  Asymmetries in attention as revealed by fixations and saccades.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Representational pseudoneglect for detecting changes to Rey-Osterrieth figures.

Authors:  Ellie Aniulis; Owen Churches; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Eye Tracking Studies Exploring Cognitive and Affective Processes among Alcohol Drinkers: a Systematic Review and Perspectives.

Authors:  Pierre Maurage; Zoé Bollen; Nicolas Masson; Fabien D'Hondt
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Attentional biases in children of depressed mothers: An event-related potential (ERP) study.

Authors:  Brandon E Gibb; Seth D Pollak; Greg Hajcak; Max Owens
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2016-09-29

5.  Behavioural asymmetries on the greyscales task: The influence of native reading direction.

Authors:  Trista E Friedrich; Lorin J Elias
Journal:  Cult Brain       Date:  2014-10-12

6.  Ocular drift along the mental number line.

Authors:  Andriy Myachykov; Rob Ellis; Angelo Cangelosi; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-02

7.  Fixation durations in scene viewing: Modeling the effects of local image features, oculomotor parameters, and task.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

8.  The Influence of Co-action on a Simple Attention Task: A Shift Back to the Status Quo.

Authors:  Jill A Dosso; Kevin H Roberts; Alessandra DiGiacomo; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-04

9.  Accuracy of Outcome Anticipation, But Not Gaze Behavior, Differs Against Left- and Right-Handed Penalties in Team-Handball Goalkeeping.

Authors:  Florian Loffing; Florian Sölter; Norbert Hagemann; Bernd Strauss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-01

10.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Occipital Place Area Biases Gaze During Scene Viewing.

Authors:  George L Malcolm; Edward H Silson; Jennifer R Henry; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.