Literature DB >> 27460843

Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center.

Antonio Pellegrino1, Gianluca Raffaello Damiani2,3, Giorgio Fachechi1, Silvia Corso1, Cecilia Pirovano1, Claudia Trio1, Mario Villa1, Daniela Turoli1, Aly Youssef4.   

Abstract

Despite the rapid uptake of robotic surgery, the effectiveness of robotically assisted hysterectomy (RAH) remains uncertain, due to the costs widely variable. Observed the different related costs of robotic procedures, in different countries, we performed a detailed economic analysis of the cost of RAH compared with total laparoscopic (TLH) and open hysterectomy (OH). The three surgical routes were matched according to age, BMI, and comorbidities. Hysterectomy costs were collected prospectively from September 2014 to September 2015. Direct costs were determined by examining the overall medical pathway for each type of intervention. Surgical procedure cost for RAH was €3598 compared with €912 for TLH and €1094 for OH. The cost of the robot-specific supplies was €2705 per intervention. When considering overall medical surgical care, the patient treatment average cost of a RAH was €4695 with a hospital stay (HS) of 2 days (range 2-4) compared with €2053 for TLH and €2846 for OH. The main driver of additional costs is disposable instruments of the robot, which is not compensated by the hospital room costs and by an experienced team staff. Implementation of strategies to reduce the cost of robotic instrumentation is due. No significant cost difference among the three procedures was observed; however, despite the optimal operative time, the experienced, surgeon and the lower HS, RAH resulted 2, 3 times and 1, 6 times more expensive in our institution than TLH and OH, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost analysis; Lapaprotomy; Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27460843     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0625-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  22 in total

1.  The effect of surgeon volume on outcomes and resource use for vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Lisa J Rogo-Gupta; Sharyn N Lewin; Jin Hee Kim; William M Burke; Xuming Sun; Thomas J Herzog; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Influence of surgical volume on outcome for laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Dawn L Hershman; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Sharyn N Lewin; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions.

Authors:  Anna-Maija Tapper; Mikko Hannola; Rainer Zeitlin; Jaana Isojärvi; Harri Sintonen; Tuija S Ikonen
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Lavonne Kots; Nebojsa Stevanovic; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Resad P Pasic; John A Rizzo; Hai Fang; Susan Ross; Matt Moore; Candace Gunnarsson
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Effect of surgical volume on morbidity and mortality of abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Sharyn N Lewin; Israel Deutsch; William M Burke; Xuming Sun; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  [Study of surplus cost of robotic assistance for radical hysterectomy, versus laparotomy and standard laparoscopy].

Authors:  T Dennis; C de Mendonça; J Phalippou; P Collinet; L Boulanger; F Weingertner; E Leblanc; F Narducci
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil       Date:  2012-01-16

8.  Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience.

Authors:  R Kevin Reynolds; Arnold P Advincula
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without a robot: Stanford experience.

Authors:  Camran Nezhat; Ofer Lavie; Madeleine Lemyre; Ofer Gemer; Lisa Bhagan; Ceana Nezhat
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cost analysis of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center: an update in gynecologic oncological field.

Authors:  Antonio Pellegrino; Gianluca Raffaello Damiani; Giorgio Fachechi; Cecilia Pirovano; Maria Gaetani; Aly Youssef
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-15

2.  Tips and Details for Successful Robotic Myomectomy: Single-Center Experience with the First 125 Cases.

Authors:  Lei Dou; Yi Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Introduction of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer into a Brazilian cancer service: a randomized trial evaluating perioperative clinical outcomes and costs.

Authors:  Alexandre Silva E Silva; João Paulo Mancusi de Carvalho; Cristina Anton; Rodrigo Pinto Fernandes; Edmund Chada Baracat; Jesus Paula Carvalho
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.365

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.