Literature DB >> 22252053

[Study of surplus cost of robotic assistance for radical hysterectomy, versus laparotomy and standard laparoscopy].

T Dennis1, C de Mendonça, J Phalippou, P Collinet, L Boulanger, F Weingertner, E Leblanc, F Narducci.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study purpose was to compare the costs among robotic, laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients underwent robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Cases were performed by three surgeons, at two institutions, and were retrospectively reviewed to perform a cost comparison between all three modalities. We included costs for edible materials in anesthesia and surgery, but costs for staff and indirect financial expenses were excluded. Those data are compared to open and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy data.
RESULTS: The average cost for robotic assistance presented a surplus of 1796 euros compare to laparotomy and 1313 euros compare to standard laparoscopy in 2008, and 1320 and 837 euros respectively. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: The average cost for radical hysterectomy was highest for robotic, followed by standard laparoscopy, and least for laparotomy. However, over only 2 years of use, this difference tends to decrease. Medico-economic impact is the main restraint for robotic assistance development, and needs to be assessed permanently.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier SAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22252053     DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil        ISSN: 1297-9589


  3 in total

1.  A cost evaluation methodology for surgical technologies.

Authors:  Imad Ismail; Sandrine Wolff; Agnes Gronfier; Didier Mutter; Lee L Swanström; Lee L Swantröm
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cost analysis of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center: an update in gynecologic oncological field.

Authors:  Antonio Pellegrino; Gianluca Raffaello Damiani; Giorgio Fachechi; Cecilia Pirovano; Maria Gaetani; Aly Youssef
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-15

3.  Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center.

Authors:  Antonio Pellegrino; Gianluca Raffaello Damiani; Giorgio Fachechi; Silvia Corso; Cecilia Pirovano; Claudia Trio; Mario Villa; Daniela Turoli; Aly Youssef
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-07-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.