Literature DB >> 21989660

Influence of surgical volume on outcome for laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Jason D Wright1, Dawn L Hershman, William M Burke, Yu-Shiang Lu, Alfred I Neugut, Sharyn N Lewin, Thomas J Herzog.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The volume of surgical procedures performed by hospitals and surgeons has a strong influence on outcomes for a number of surgeries. We examined the influence of surgeon and hospital case volume on morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization for women with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.
METHODS: Perspective, a nationwide inpatient database developed to measure utilization and quality, was used to examine women with endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy from 2000 to 2010. Perioperative morbidity, mortality, and cost were compared using Chi-square tests and multivariable generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: A total of 4,137 patients were identified. The overall complication rate was 9.8% for low-volume vs. 10.4% for high-volume surgeons [multivariable odds ratio (OR) = 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.41-1.22]. The rates of intraoperative complications, surgical-site complications, medical complications, transfusion, and reoperation were similar for patients treated by low- and high-volume surgeons (p > 0.05 for all). The adjusted estimate for hospital cost for patients treated by high- compared with low-volume surgeons was 219 USD (95% CI, -790 to 1,228 USD). The odds ratio for any complication in high- compared with low-volume hospitals was 1.24 (95% CI, 0.78-1.96). The average cost for patients treated in high- compared with low-volume facilities was -815 USD (95% CI, -1,641 to 11 USD). Neither physician nor hospital volume had a statistically significant effect on perioperative mortality.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer is well tolerated and associated with an acceptable morbidity profile. Surgeon and hospital volume appear to have little effect on perioperative morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21989660     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2090-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  17 in total

1.  Safely Increase the Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Rate: A Novel Three-Tiered Preoperative Categorization System Can Predict the Difficulty for Benign Disease.

Authors:  Esteban Andryjowicz; Teresa B Wray; V Reinaldo Ruiz; James Rudolf; Sara Noroozkhani; Sandra Crowder; Jeff M Slezak
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015-07-24

2.  Changes in Surgical Volume and Outcomes Over Time for Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Maria P Ruiz; Ling Chen; Lisa R Gabor; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center.

Authors:  Antonio Pellegrino; Gianluca Raffaello Damiani; Giorgio Fachechi; Silvia Corso; Cecilia Pirovano; Claudia Trio; Mario Villa; Daniela Turoli; Aly Youssef
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-07-26

4.  Impact of hospital volume on racial disparities and outcomes for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ama Buskwofie; Yongmei Huang; Ana I Tergas; June Y Hou; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Large bowel injuries during gynecological laparoscopy.

Authors:  Kahraman Ulker; Turgut Anuk; Murat Bozkurt; Yetkin Karasu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Referral patterns between high- and low-volume centers and associations with uterine cancer treatment and survival: a population-based study of Medicare, Medicaid, and privately insured women.

Authors:  Kemi M Doll; Ke Meng; Paola A Gehrig; Wendy R Brewster; Anne-Marie Meyer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Outcomes of Robotic Hysterectomy for Treatment of Benign Conditions: Influence of Patient Complexity.

Authors:  Lisa J Herrinton; Tina Raine-Bennett; Liyan Liu; Stacey E Alexeeff; Wilfredo Ramos; Betty Suh-Burgmann
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-12-18

8.  Effect of surgeon volume on long-term quality of life outcomes following tension-free vaginal tape surgery.

Authors:  Harold Baxter; Edward Carter; Kelsi Marris; Rachael Nugent; Edward Weaver
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 1.932

9.  Disparities in the surgical staging of high-grade endometrial cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Jonathan R Foote; Stephanie Gaillard; Gloria Broadwater; Julie A Sosa; Brittany Davidson; Mohamed A Adam; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Monica B Jones; Junzo Chino; Laura J Havrilesky
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Res Pract       Date:  2017-01-19

10.  The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative outcomes in hysterectomy.

Authors:  Florentien E M Vree; Sarah L Cohen; Niraj Chavan; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.